Please Ban Lag

Please Ban Lag — CS2 Stats

US76561198215655687[U:1:255389959]Steam profile ↗

1,699Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,001 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPlease Ban LagFACEITLevel 9 · 2,001 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning53
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53398Last 10053%Win rateWWLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0
Aggression6.0
Utility7.1
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.3
Utility7.1
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time566ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy27.4%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.6% → last ⅓ avg 27.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — cache 13–1
131Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B1991047%0.02
cacheS1711665%0.03
mirageC167944%0.03
anubisA159660%0.04
ancientB137654%0.03
infernoD134931%0.03
nukeS54180%0.01
vertigo110100%0.00
overpass110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

542Matches
52%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
81.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11251%1.0815.9
Anubis10558%1.0615.7
Ancient7953%1.0916.3
Dust27544%1.1217.6
Inferno5740%1.0414.7
Vertigo5564%1.0916.6
Nuke2744%1.1616.3
Overpass1573%1.1718.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.9%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
84.9%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
560msReaction time
26.2%T opening success
48.2%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
14.0%Flash assists
9.59HE damage / grenade
14.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.1774% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–110.0126%23 Aug
anubis13–40.0819%23 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0932%22 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0512%22 Aug
cache13–11-0.0121%21 Aug
ancient19–17-0.0126%16 Aug
cache16–19-0.0119%16 Aug
anubis13–60.0835%6 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0126%6 Aug
nuke13–80.0534%6 Aug
cache13–50.0131%6 Aug
mirage7–130.0444%6 Aug
dust28–13-0.0237%6 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0130%6 Aug
ancient13–10.1328%6 Aug
inferno13–100.0823%6 Aug
vertigo16–130.0033%5 Aug
dust213–160.0127%3 Aug
anubis11–130.0429%1 Aug
cache17–190.0824%8 Jul
dust213–50.0840%8 Jul
anubis13–60.0729%7 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0324%7 Jul
ancient13–50.0723%28 Jun
inferno10–130.0319%28 Jun
mirage13–50.0836%28 Jun
nuke13–70.0527%28 Jun
anubis13–20.0929%28 Jun
cache13–5-0.058%28 Jun
dust25–13-0.0127%28 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0330%17 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0127%17 Jun
mirage4–130.0131%16 Jun
inferno11–130.0729%6 Jun
dust213–90.0212%6 Jun
anubis12–120.0229%6 Jun
mirage12–120.0019%6 Jun
anubis12–120.0918%2 Jun
cache7–1-0.0925%2 Jun
ancient11–130.0232%1 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0225%1 Jun
nuke8–1-0.0433%1 Jun
inferno13–40.1121%1 Jun
dust213–80.0328%1 Jun
anubis13–110.0522%31 May
mirage13–50.0325%31 May
cache6–130.0623%25 May
anubis13–70.1426%25 May
dust24–130.0730%25 May
ancient13–60.0521%22 May
dust213–90.0220%22 May
dust24–13-0.0721%11 May
nuke1–13-0.0317%11 May
anubis11–130.0521%11 May
cache3–130.1024%11 May
mirage12–120.1239%9 May
dust212–120.1331%9 May
cache13–50.0030%8 May
nuke13–90.0325%8 May
dust213–30.0444%8 May
inferno13–50.0925%8 May
cache13–110.0425%8 May
mirage9–13-0.0031%6 May
cache13–70.0123%6 May
cache13–11-0.0117%6 May
cache7–130.0431%6 May
cache13–40.0322%4 May
cache13–60.1327%2 May
cache13–10.1534%2 May
cache7–13-0.0422%2 May
anubis2–13-0.0714%28 Apr
ancient13–70.0923%27 Apr
dust25–13-0.0833%27 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0022%27 Apr
overpass13–20.0320%24 Apr
inferno2–130.0128%24 Apr
dust213–60.0114%24 Apr
inferno9–13-0.029%20 Apr
ancient12–120.0525%17 Apr
dust26–130.0435%17 Apr
anubis13–20.0740%16 Apr
mirage11–130.0324%16 Apr
inferno12–120.0235%16 Apr
dust216–14-0.0521%16 Apr
anubis16–13-0.0119%11 Apr
inferno8–130.1029%7 Apr
mirage13–110.0622%7 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0129%7 Apr
anubis2–00.0333%7 Apr
dust28–13-0.0029%7 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0022%7 Apr
dust213–70.0524%4 Apr
dust213–160.0818%4 Apr
mirage13–40.0825%4 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0227%4 Apr
mirage13–40.0311%2 Apr
mirage13–100.0835%30 Mar
dust222–200.0820%27 Mar
ancient12–120.0021%21 Mar
inferno6–130.0123%21 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →