FPSGambit — CS2 Stats

76561198215465975[U:1:255200247]✓ No bans

557Tracked matches39%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,923Purple band · top ~8.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9822 of 22367 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFPSGambitFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,923 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning58
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48475Last 10048%Win rateWLLWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.9
Aggression8.8
Utility4.7
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.3
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.8
Utility4.7
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact1.4

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time561ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 592ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–2
131Biggest win — anubis
4Longest win streak
59In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 60% over 15infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB1910953%0.01
dust2B179853%0.01
mirageA159660%0.01
anubisC145936%0.02
infernoD124833%-0.01
cacheC125742%-0.00
nukeA95456%0.04
fachwerk110100%0.11
boulder1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

99Matches
52%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
83.4ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22065%1.2518.6
Nuke1362%1.4416.5
Ancient1250%1.2418.6
Cache1020%0.9815.8
Anubis862%1.3223.0
Mirage633%0.9515.8
Inferno333%0.8311.0
Overpass1100%1.2714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
554msReaction time
39.8%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
8.0%Flash assists
9.57HE damage / grenade
8.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4515 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.8339% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–50.0926%26 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0126%25 Aug
ancient10–130.0627%25 Aug
ancient13–80.0213%25 Aug
mirage11–130.0124%24 Aug
anubis14–160.0324%24 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0217%23 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0625%23 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0120%21 Aug
nuke13–30.0316%21 Aug
dust211–130.0114%21 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0119%20 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0118%20 Aug
dust213–80.1121%20 Aug
inferno7–130.0423%19 Aug
mirage6–130.0119%18 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0718%18 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0228%18 Aug
dust25–130.0826%17 Aug
dust216–130.0318%17 Aug
dust28–130.0322%13 Aug
cache13–16-0.0522%11 Aug
ancient4–130.0012%10 Aug
mirage15–150.0622%10 Aug
anubis22–19-0.0114%9 Aug
dust215–15-0.0123%7 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0121%7 Aug
inferno13–9-0.028%7 Aug
dust213–90.0012%7 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0224%6 Aug
anubis13–110.0722%6 Aug
cache11–13-0.0114%6 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0143%6 Aug
anubis13–70.0416%6 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0017%5 Aug
dust213–2-0.0621%4 Aug
mirage13–100.0116%4 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0221%3 Aug
ancient6–130.0128%3 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0123%3 Aug
mirage13–110.0229%2 Aug
ancient13–80.0130%2 Aug
ancient13–90.0612%2 Aug
cache9–13-0.0121%2 Aug
cache2–13-0.0518%25 Jul
ancient8–130.0424%24 Jul
dust23–0-0.010%24 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0615%23 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0424%23 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0416%23 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0319%23 Jul
cache13–10-0.048%23 Jul
dust27–13-0.1024%23 Jul
ancient13–7-0.038%23 Jul
ancient13–110.0319%23 Jul
dust213–50.0813%23 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0511%23 Jul
cache6–13-0.0128%23 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0125%22 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0116%22 Jul
inferno9–130.0119%22 Jul
cache13–30.0521%22 Jul
mirage13–20.1333%22 Jul
ancient13–50.0623%22 Jul
anubis13–10.0418%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.1018%20 Jul
anubis11–130.0121%19 Jul
dust216–120.0320%19 Jul
cache2–13-0.0326%19 Jul
nuke13–100.0111%19 Jul
fachwerk13–70.1111%19 Jul
boulder7–13-0.0513%19 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0516%19 Jul
ancient13–20.0211%19 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0219%18 Jul
cache16–120.0422%18 Jul
inferno8–130.0520%18 Jul
nuke13–50.1128%18 Jul
cache13–10.0514%18 Jul
inferno13–20.0618%18 Jul
nuke12–120.1324%18 Jul
anubis8–130.0029%17 Jul
dust212–120.0516%17 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0118%17 Jul
cache15–15-0.0417%17 Jul
anubis9–130.0413%17 Jul
dust213–50.0823%17 Jul
inferno0–9-0.0614%17 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0510%17 Jul
cache13–100.0420%17 Jul
nuke13–50.1011%17 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0221%17 Jul
anubis6–130.0619%17 Jul
ancient11–130.0116%16 Jul
dust213–10-0.0110%16 Jul
mirage13–70.0421%16 Jul
nuke8–130.0624%16 Jul
mirage13–80.0324%16 Jul
dust28–13-0.0320%16 Jul
ancient8–130.0314%15 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →