meniometa — CS2 Stats

76561198215304176[U:1:255038448]

2,773Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating12,669Blue band · top ~40.8% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning41

Utility14

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–47–7Last 10046%Win rateWWTLLWWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7

Aggression3.4

Utility1.4

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch4.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning4.1

Utility1.4

Mechanics5.0

Opening Duels0.9

Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time547ms−22ms

first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms

Headshot accuracy13.4%+0.1%

first ⅓ avg 13.3% → last ⅓ avg 13.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — nuke 13–3

13–2Biggest win — nuke

3Longest win streak

W2Current streak

3–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 57% over 14cacheWeakest map · 41% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	26	13–13	50%	-0.02
ancient	B	19	9–10	47%	-0.03
cache	C	17	7–10	41%	-0.03
anubis	A	14	8–6	57%	-0.02
vertigo	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.00
mirage	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.04
inferno	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.03
dust2	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.05
overpass	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.05
train	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01
office	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

77Matches

48%Win rate

0.68Avg K/D

50.7ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

9%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Vertigo	19	37%	0.72	11.3
Nuke	14	57%	0.72	8.9
Mirage	11	45%	0.46	6.5
Anubis	11	64%	0.71	10.7
Ancient	8	38%	0.74	13.3
Inferno	7	43%	0.72	10.1
Overpass	6	50%	0.73	8.2
Dust2	1	100%	0.50	8.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy

33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.8%Spray accuracy

72.6%Counter-strafing

7.9°Preaim

561msReaction time

22.6%T opening success

37.0%CT opening success

0.22Enemies flashed / flash

0.9%Flash assists

1.80HE damage / grenade

1.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 13.5496% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.217 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.5826% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–5	-0.05	21%	27 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.07	14%	26 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.07	9%	26 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.07	11%	24 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	16%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.06	6%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.05	21%	22 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	0.06	13%	22 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.05	8%	22 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.03	8%	22 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	14%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.04	21%	19 Aug →
train	13–10	-0.01	13%	17 Aug →
cache	0–13	-0.05	29%	15 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.10	3%	5 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.02	15%	5 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	29%	5 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.10	21%	5 Aug →
vertigo	3–13	-0.02	29%	5 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.06	19%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.01	11%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	15%	3 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.09	6%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.00	9%	2 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	10%	1 Aug →
cache	2–0	0.00	0%	1 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	10%	1 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	9%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.01	17%	1 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	-0.05	3%	1 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.08	14%	1 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.04	5%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.02	10%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.03	12%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.07	4%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	13%	30 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	12%	30 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.05	14%	30 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.09	4%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	13%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	8%	29 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	16%	29 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.09	6%	28 Jul →
overpass	12–12	-0.05	12%	28 Jul →
dust2	5–1	-0.06	0%	28 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.08	8%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.04	19%	23 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.01	6%	23 Jul →
vertigo	6–13	-0.05	0%	22 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.05	10%	22 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	-0.05	19%	20 Jul →
anubis	1–13	-0.06	6%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	12%	19 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.01	13%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	12%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	12%	18 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.06	11%	17 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.06	17%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.05	10%	17 Jul →
nuke	12–16	0.02	9%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.05	15%	16 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	-0.00	13%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	20%	16 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	14%	14 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	0.09	19%	14 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.09	12%	14 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.02	11%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	11%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	21%	14 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	12%	13 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.01	12%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.07	10%	13 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.07	19%	13 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.06	16%	13 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	7%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.02	13%	13 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	21%	12 Jul →
cache	12–5	-0.03	20%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.01	10%	12 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	13%	12 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.08	34%	12 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	12%	12 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	7%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.10	10%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–4	-0.06	8%	12 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.08	9%	11 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	11%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.06	16%	11 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	11%	9 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.02	11%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.02	12%	8 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	15%	8 Jul →
office	13–5	0.02	14%	8 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	25%	2 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.01	12%	2 Jul →
overpass	7–13	-0.06	5%	29 Jun →
nuke	6–13	-0.09	5%	25 Jun →
anubis	16–14	-0.01	14%	24 Jun →
overpass	8–13	-0.04	11%	24 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	14%	22 Jun →