UltimateSteakhouseWhopper®Jr.

UltimateSteakhouseWhopper®Jr. — CS2 Stats

76561198213486911[U:1:253221183]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

859Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.0 Learning
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGUltimateSteakhouseWhopper…FACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim32
Positioning37
Utility17

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT45469Last 10045%Win rateWTWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.2
Aggression2.1
Utility1.7
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.2
Positioning3.7
Utility1.7
Mechanics2.4
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 3.0/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time607ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy13.7%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 11.0% → last ⅓ avg 13.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — office 13–8
131Biggest win — office
5Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 51% over 75vertigoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeB75383751%-0.01
cacheD62433%-0.01
vertigoD61517%-0.06
train42250%-0.03
anubis4040%-0.05
mirage220100%-0.05
overpass1010%-0.08
inferno1010%-0.02
ancient1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.8%Headshot accuracy
27.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
60.9%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
614msReaction time
13.9%T opening success
37.2%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
1.8%Flash assists
6.81HE damage / grenade
1.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.784% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3362 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 13.9168% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategyVertigo grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office13–9-0.0314%16 Aug
train12–12-0.0323%15 Aug
office13–8-0.0216%15 Aug
train13–3-0.0312%15 Aug
office13–60.047%15 Aug
office13–11-0.0316%14 Aug
office4–10.050%14 Aug
office11–13-0.1016%12 Aug
office13–80.0412%11 Aug
cache3–13-0.0513%9 Aug
office13–110.0410%2 Aug
office13–7-0.103%1 Aug
office5–130.0411%1 Aug
anubis7–130.0214%26 Jul
office13–60.0711%26 Jul
cache7–13-0.0515%13 Jul
office6–1-0.0912%13 Jul
office5–13-0.088%11 Jul
office13–80.1211%11 Jul
cache7–13-0.0322%5 Jul
office13–70.0016%4 Jul
cache10–13-0.084%1 Jul
office8–13-0.0215%29 Jun
office11–13-0.0315%27 Jun
office2–13-0.0918%27 Jun
office4–13-0.0517%25 Jun
office4–13-0.0517%23 Jun
office12–120.015%19 Jun
office12–12-0.0313%18 Jun
office13–9-0.029%17 Jun
office3–5-0.1240%13 Jun
office4–13-0.0424%7 Jun
cache13–90.0614%7 Jun
cache13–90.079%5 May
office13–6-0.0211%28 Apr
office10–130.0111%28 Apr
office10–13-0.0323%19 Apr
office13–90.0215%16 Apr
office13–10-0.0510%12 Apr
vertigo13–8-0.1020%11 Apr
vertigo5–13-0.087%9 Apr
anubis12–12-0.0110%5 Apr
office3–13-0.1019%1 Apr
office8–13-0.0518%29 Mar
office9–00.088%29 Mar
office13–11-0.0014%26 Mar
office12–120.029%20 Mar
office13–50.0417%17 Mar
office4–130.0215%16 Mar
office13–90.0520%16 Mar
office3–13-0.054%15 Mar
office5–13-0.0820%12 Mar
overpass8–13-0.087%11 Mar
office13–40.0218%10 Mar
office10–13-0.0210%8 Mar
office10–13-0.0415%8 Mar
office13–60.0411%26 Feb
train13–5-0.028%26 Feb
train9–13-0.0619%25 Feb
office11–13-0.0811%25 Feb
office13–11-0.006%24 Feb
office13–40.0710%17 Feb
office1–13-0.1213%15 Feb
office13–11-0.0110%14 Feb
vertigo8–13-0.0513%12 Feb
vertigo3–13-0.0716%12 Feb
vertigo7–13-0.052%11 Feb
vertigo7–13-0.0413%11 Feb
office7–13-0.0713%10 Feb
office13–10-0.0710%8 Feb
office8–130.0016%8 Feb
office10–13-0.0710%6 Feb
office4–13-0.074%6 Feb
anubis11–13-0.082%6 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0211%5 Feb
office13–50.024%4 Feb
anubis5–13-0.1313%4 Feb
office12–120.0014%4 Feb
office12–120.029%3 Feb
office13–10-0.068%3 Feb
inferno15–15-0.0217%1 Feb
office8–130.0413%1 Feb
office13–5-0.0115%31 Jan
ancient4–13-0.074%30 Jan
office13–6-0.0611%30 Jan
office13–11-0.0320%29 Jan
office13–7-0.078%29 Jan
office13–70.0214%29 Jan
office7–13-0.0720%28 Jan
office9–130.0010%28 Jan
office12–120.068%27 Jan
office9–130.0116%26 Jan
office13–10.0720%26 Jan
office13–10.047%26 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0713%25 Jan
office7–130.039%25 Jan
office0–7-0.0810%24 Jan
office13–70.029%24 Jan
office13–6-0.057%24 Jan
office13–110.047%23 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →