gfmp noah — CS2 Stats

76561198213263369[U:1:252997641]✓ No bans

941Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 Developing
Premier CS Rating21,834Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8573 of 27967 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgfmp noahPREMIER21,834 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning46
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47512Last 10047%Win rateLLWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.0
Aggression5.7
Utility7.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 631ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.6
Utility7.0
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time643ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy18.3%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — cache 13–9
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A28161257%-0.01
mirageC1981142%-0.02
ancientC156940%-0.01
infernoC125742%-0.03
cacheA85363%0.07
anubisD71614%-0.06
nukeD72529%-0.01
overpass440100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

76Matches
55%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo580%1.3915.8
Anubis560%1.0016.0
Ancient475%1.4019.3
Mirage425%0.7813.0
Nuke367%0.8714.7
Inferno1100%0.7115.0
Overpass1100%1.3312.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
28.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
69.5%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
631msReaction time
28.0%T opening success
49.4%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
10.79HE damage / grenade
18.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.0329% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage0–8-0.0613%26 Aug
mirage2–13-0.1433%26 Aug
dust213–9-0.0115%24 Aug
inferno14–160.0230%24 Aug
cache13–60.0522%24 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0122%20 Aug
dust213–10.0314%20 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0313%20 Aug
cache8–13-0.0232%17 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0328%17 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0613%10 Aug
dust213–70.0625%10 Aug
mirage9–130.0210%10 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0326%6 Aug
mirage11–130.018%5 Aug
cache13–80.0919%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0610%4 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0816%22 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0610%22 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0119%22 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0519%21 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0121%21 Jul
dust211–13-0.059%21 Jul
dust213–70.0115%21 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0611%21 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0112%21 Jul
cache13–160.0620%21 Jul
dust23–2-0.1033%21 Jul
dust213–70.0317%17 Jul
ancient13–100.0213%17 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0711%14 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0126%14 Jul
dust214–16-0.0020%14 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0313%14 Jul
cache13–30.1428%14 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0516%14 Jul
cache13–30.1123%8 Jul
cache8–13-0.0614%7 Jul
cache13–90.2120%7 Jul
inferno13–70.0123%5 Jul
dust211–13-0.0228%5 Jul
dust21–6-0.0319%5 Jul
ancient11–130.0114%5 Jul
overpass13–90.0719%4 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0218%4 Jul
dust210–13-0.0516%3 Jul
dust22–13-0.089%3 Jul
ancient14–16-0.079%3 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0224%2 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0331%2 Jul
mirage0–13-0.090%2 Jul
ancient15–150.0312%29 Jun
inferno13–40.0014%29 Jun
dust213–00.0617%29 Jun
nuke13–110.0211%16 Jun
nuke3–13-0.094%9 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0317%9 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0316%9 Jun
anubis8–13-0.108%8 Jun
mirage13–30.1016%8 Jun
ancient7–13-0.087%8 Jun
dust24–13-0.0621%7 Jun
dust213–80.0524%7 Jun
dust213–60.0318%7 Jun
inferno1–13-0.0123%29 May
ancient13–7-0.0213%28 May
nuke9–130.0724%27 May
dust26–13-0.0314%27 May
inferno16–14-0.1016%19 May
ancient3–13-0.027%19 May
ancient13–10.1512%15 May
inferno10–13-0.0419%15 May
dust213–110.0024%15 May
dust26–13-0.0728%13 May
mirage10–13-0.1118%12 May
mirage13–50.0415%12 May
ancient13–10-0.0114%11 May
dust213–110.0327%11 May
nuke9–13-0.0015%11 May
dust210–130.0421%9 May
anubis5–13-0.0320%9 May
dust213–50.018%7 May
nuke11–13-0.0214%6 May
dust26–13-0.0413%27 Apr
dust213–80.0119%27 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0736%27 Apr
overpass13–00.0117%27 Apr
overpass13–4-0.0229%27 Apr
dust216–14-0.0225%23 Apr
dust27–130.0012%23 Apr
dust213–10-0.005%22 Apr
inferno9–13-0.059%8 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0518%8 Apr
dust213–3-0.0114%8 Apr
overpass13–80.0318%6 Apr
mirage13–80.0019%6 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0117%6 Apr
mirage15–150.0117%6 Apr
mirage13–100.039%2 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0835%2 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →