GaszE PetY

GaszE PetY — CS2 Stats

PL76561198212829032[U:1:252563304]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,160Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,299Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9220 of 33676 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,263 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGaszE PetYFACEITLevel 4 · 1,263 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER22,299 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning35
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50491Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression3.2
Utility4.9
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning3.5
Utility4.9
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time615ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%−3.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — inferno 13–3
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 18infernoWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B189950%-0.03
mirageA1811761%-0.00
infernoC145936%-0.02
cacheB147750%-0.00
anubisB137654%-0.02
ancientA116555%-0.00
nukeC52340%-0.04
overpass42250%0.01
office2020%-0.04
vertigo110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

78Matches
54%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
84.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21267%0.7913.3
Ancient1242%0.9915.9
Anubis1267%1.0618.1
Mirage1164%1.0116.3
Inferno425%0.9213.5
Cache425%1.0817.3
Train3100%1.2419.0
Overpass1100%1.4217.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
623msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
35.9%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
11.12HE damage / grenade
2.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.8007 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7439% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0135%7 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0423%7 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0411%6 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0412%6 Aug
dust28–13-0.0617%6 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0412%6 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0419%5 Aug
inferno2–13-0.090%5 Aug
dust211–13-0.0231%4 Aug
mirage13–70.0611%4 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0114%4 Aug
cache9–13-0.0215%4 Aug
dust28–13-0.0419%4 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0318%3 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0715%3 Aug
dust20–13-0.0932%3 Aug
dust213–2-0.029%3 Aug
cache13–30.039%3 Aug
dust213–8-0.0221%3 Aug
cache13–60.0217%1 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0214%20 Jul
ancient13–50.0018%18 Jul
cache0–4-0.080%18 Jul
cache13–10-0.0313%17 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0615%17 Jul
dust28–10.0310%17 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0315%17 Jul
dust216–13-0.0214%17 Jul
office8–13-0.0421%16 Jul
dust29–130.0113%15 Jul
dust213–5-0.0523%14 Jul
cache13–16-0.0113%14 Jul
dust28–13-0.0713%12 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0513%12 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0331%12 Jul
cache13–30.0616%12 Jul
cache16–13-0.0215%12 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0514%12 Jul
cache8–13-0.0311%12 Jul
cache13–90.0623%10 Jul
anubis13–80.0317%10 Jul
office2–13-0.0520%8 Jul
anubis7–130.0211%8 Jun
mirage13–110.0213%8 Jun
inferno13–5-0.058%8 Jun
ancient4–13-0.105%7 Jun
cache13–8-0.0222%6 Jun
nuke13–70.0327%6 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0513%6 Jun
dust213–10-0.0220%6 Jun
mirage13–70.0024%6 Jun
overpass13–20.0111%6 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0414%29 May
anubis5–13-0.0623%29 May
inferno13–2-0.0811%23 May
anubis13–60.0310%23 May
ancient13–70.0213%23 May
cache4–130.0015%20 May
mirage8–13-0.0025%17 May
overpass3–130.0829%17 May
cache8–130.0625%3 May
cache7–13-0.0419%3 May
inferno9–130.0013%21 Apr
dust213–50.0416%21 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0522%21 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0610%20 Apr
mirage13–110.0615%16 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0611%15 Apr
ancient3–130.0529%15 Apr
inferno13–70.0512%15 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0618%14 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0220%14 Apr
mirage13–100.0416%14 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0312%14 Apr
anubis13–100.0123%14 Apr
inferno1–8-0.0263%13 Apr
mirage13–40.0818%13 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0118%13 Apr
anubis16–13-0.0120%12 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0123%12 Apr
overpass13–30.0215%12 Apr
dust28–13-0.0720%12 Apr
inferno13–30.1123%12 Apr
ancient10–130.0621%12 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0316%12 Apr
inferno11–13-0.0017%12 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0615%11 Apr
inferno13–16-0.1019%11 Apr
anubis13–100.0322%11 Apr
mirage13–90.0725%9 Apr
ancient13–40.0316%9 Apr
dust210–13-0.0321%8 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0029%8 Apr
dust216–14-0.078%6 Apr
dust22–13-0.059%5 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0818%5 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0413%5 Apr
ancient13–30.0418%5 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0815%2 Apr
vertigo13–6-0.0623%2 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →