◢Tinu' Augustinu'◤ — CS2 Stats

76561198208426348[U:1:248160620]✓ No bans

2,419Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating25,266Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3407 of 28846 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,432 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning56

Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD56–41–3Last 10056%Win rateLWWLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.2

Aggression8.0

Utility7.7

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels2.8

Clutch3.6

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning5.6

Utility7.7

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels2.8

Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time554ms−16ms

first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 554ms

Headshot accuracy21.6%+0.3%

first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–5

13–2Biggest win — dust2

8Longest win streak

5–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 18anubisWeakest map · 40% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	27	14–13	52%	0.02
mirage	B	24	13–11	54%	0.02
ancient	S	18	15–3	83%	0.04
anubis	C	15	6–9	40%	-0.00
inferno	A	7	4–3	57%	0.04
nuke	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.02
cache	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.08
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,075Matches

57%Win rate

1.29Avg K/D

80.5ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	116	64%	1.32	16.1
Dust2	88	52%	1.52	15.1
Mirage	88	55%	1.40	16.7
Anubis	74	57%	1.24	16.6
Inferno	18	61%	1.42	16.8
Nuke	14	43%	1.09	14.6
Overpass	6	67%	2.38	17.0
Train	4	75%	0.99	13.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy

35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.7%Spray accuracy

80.8%Counter-strafing

8.3°Preaim

556msReaction time

37.2%T opening success

45.0%CT opening success

0.78Enemies flashed / flash

9.1%Flash assists

13.35HE damage / grenade

14.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.1843% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	0.02	32%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	22%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	12%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	17%	27 Aug →
dust2	3–13	0.06	48%	27 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.02	24%	27 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.07	15%	26 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.08	9%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	19%	26 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.01	35%	26 Aug →
inferno	9–2	0.04	26%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.04	27%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.00	12%	3 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	26%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	23%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.06	18%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.03	28%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.10	15%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.04	33%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.08	12%	29 Jul →
ancient	1–13	-0.07	25%	29 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.07	21%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.00	28%	28 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.00	16%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.11	25%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.09	22%	28 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.02	20%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.01	28%	27 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.10	6%	25 Jul →
ancient	16–12	0.03	15%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–16	0.02	23%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.07	19%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.04	12%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.06	19%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.11	34%	23 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	22%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.03	19%	23 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	23%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.02	25%	16 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.04	26%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	29%	15 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	20%	15 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	28%	15 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.02	19%	15 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.07	9%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	28%	14 Jul →
anubis	0–13	-0.12	0%	14 Jul →
mirage	8–1	0.10	35%	14 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.03	21%	13 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	21%	13 Jul →
dust2	12–16	-0.02	24%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	16%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.06	28%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.15	22%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	26%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.03	10%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	30%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	17%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.03	16%	5 Jul →
anubis	12–16	-0.03	23%	5 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	26%	27 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	10%	27 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	21%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.07	23%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.11	13%	23 Jun →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	13%	23 Jun →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	22%	23 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.02	22%	22 Jun →
overpass	13–10	0.06	19%	22 Jun →
cache	2–13	-0.07	14%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–2	0.03	23%	21 Jun →
nuke	4–13	0.01	21%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.12	18%	21 Jun →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	7%	21 Jun →
anubis	2–13	-0.03	10%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.09	23%	21 Jun →
vertigo	13–2	0.08	41%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.02	25%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.06	25%	18 Jun →
train	12–12	0.08	20%	17 Jun →
dust2	9–1	-0.02	19%	17 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.01	21%	17 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	13%	17 Jun →
anubis	7–13	0.02	36%	16 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.08	24%	15 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	15%	10 Jun →
anubis	10–13	0.06	16%	10 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.08	16%	8 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.01	29%	8 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.07	29%	5 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.04	17%	5 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.10	39%	5 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.04	25%	5 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.09	22%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	17%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	18%	30 May →
ancient	11–13	0.10	28%	30 May →
cache	7–13	0.01	23%	30 May →
mirage	8–13	0.07	17%	23 May →
dust2	0–13	-0.08	11%	23 May →