MaGGGe — CS2 Stats

76561198207675547[U:1:247409819]

504Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,987Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 Developing
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,022), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate41.7%46.2%47.2%5.4% short
Shot accuracy13.0%12.5%12.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.051.061.070.02 short
Match win rate47.8%45.9%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMaGGGeFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning44
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43552Last 10043%Win rateWWLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression4.7
Utility6.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.4
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time622ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy12.4%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 12.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–6
131Biggest win — nuke
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 64% over 14ancientWeakest map · 38% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisC27121544%-0.02
ancientC2181338%-0.01
vertigoA149564%0.00
infernoC125742%-0.02
nukeC104640%-0.03
mirageC83538%-0.01
cache42250%0.01
overpass3030%-0.04
dust21010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,820Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
2,185Matches
47.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
41.7%Headshot %
13.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
4,556MVPs
890Hours (in match)
2,128Bombs planted
509Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,392vertigo
1,843dust2
1,591inferno
1,531nuke
188cbble
114train
35lake
31office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

661Matches
50%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
78.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis13353%1.1615.2
Ancient12350%1.0716.1
Inferno7142%0.9414.5
Nuke6356%1.2114.7
Mirage3441%0.9713.5
Vertigo3256%1.0713.6
Cache1560%1.2316.3
Overpass944%0.9915.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.4%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
75.3%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
624msReaction time
24.4%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
9.71HE damage / grenade
15.82Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.4104% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.3688% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–60.1211%21 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0410%19 Jul
anubis8–130.0314%12 Jul
anubis13–50.0312%7 Jul
anubis6–13-0.1311%5 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0814%28 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0211%24 Jun
anubis9–130.0017%21 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0113%21 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0415%15 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0213%11 Jun
ancient13–70.0914%10 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0622%4 Jun
ancient4–13-0.133%3 Jun
anubis20–22-0.048%1 Jun
anubis12–16-0.0319%1 Jun
cache13–80.0218%29 May
inferno13–7-0.0016%29 May
ancient13–90.0211%25 May
inferno13–70.057%23 May
cache13–80.0317%7 May
cache14–160.0110%2 May
overpass8–13-0.0317%1 May
cache7–13-0.0311%30 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0211%30 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0110%28 Apr
inferno4–13-0.015%25 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0210%10 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0111%7 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0616%4 Apr
anubis13–10-0.019%4 Apr
ancient6–130.0515%4 Apr
inferno19–160.008%2 Apr
ancient10–130.0419%31 Mar
nuke10–130.0426%28 Mar
anubis13–4-0.016%25 Mar
anubis3–13-0.069%25 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0310%25 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0429%15 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0213%7 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0612%7 Mar
nuke16–12-0.0216%22 Feb
inferno16–13-0.0315%1 Mar
ancient7–130.0311%26 Feb
ancient13–80.0419%12 Feb
ancient1–13-0.0626%5 Feb
anubis13–80.0114%5 Feb
ancient14–16-0.0118%11 Jan
vertigo13–20.0123%3 Jan
vertigo13–60.0424%13 Dec
vertigo16–140.0410%23 Oct
vertigo11–13-0.0415%19 Oct
ancient13–8-0.046%19 Oct
ancient8–13-0.0311%19 Oct
anubis13–30.068%16 Oct
vertigo16–120.0113%16 Oct
nuke10–130.0227%16 Oct
vertigo13–40.0918%15 Oct
ancient15–15-0.0520%14 Oct
ancient3–13-0.1218%14 Oct
nuke6–13-0.0219%13 Oct
vertigo8–13-0.0713%13 Oct
anubis16–140.0413%13 Oct
ancient15–15-0.0315%13 Oct
anubis9–130.0510%12 Oct
mirage13–16-0.007%12 Oct
vertigo11–13-0.008%6 Oct
anubis4–13-0.1215%6 Oct
anubis13–90.1018%6 Oct
mirage6–13-0.070%6 Oct
inferno10–13-0.037%3 Oct
anubis10–13-0.0214%8 Jun
nuke13–3-0.0025%7 Jun
dust22–13-0.0527%17 May
nuke13–11-0.0515%12 May
mirage3–130.0023%12 May
anubis10–13-0.0718%19 Apr
vertigo13–90.0216%12 Apr
ancient16–13-0.018%11 Apr
anubis13–100.0011%5 Apr
overpass4–13-0.0720%2 Apr
ancient1–6-0.0625%1 Apr
anubis9–13-0.049%23 Mar
nuke13–1-0.0830%23 Mar
ancient10–130.0115%9 Mar
anubis20–22-0.0114%8 Mar
nuke5–13-0.1217%7 Mar
vertigo3–13-0.0310%7 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0429%6 Mar
vertigo8–13-0.049%3 Mar
mirage5–130.0312%3 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0423%2 Mar
ancient13–50.0617%2 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0415%25 Feb
vertigo13–9-0.0014%23 Feb
anubis13–50.0414%23 Feb
vertigo16–140.0014%21 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0821%21 Feb
anubis13–7-0.060%18 Feb
vertigo13–60.0116%16 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →