Сатурн — CS2 Stats

76561198207077125[U:1:246811397]✓ No bans

1,094Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGСатурнFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning45
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42544Last 10042%Win rateLLWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.4
Aggression5.2
Utility4.4
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.5
Utility4.4
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time597ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy13.5%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 13.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–7
130Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27111641%0.01
dust2A2112957%0.01
ancientC114736%0.00
anubisA85363%-0.00
cacheC83538%-0.01
nukeD71614%-0.05
infernoD5050%-0.08
train43175%0.08
eldorado21150%0.04
office21150%-0.07
debris2020%-0.08
shelter21150%0.06
fachwerk1010%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

74Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
84.2ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1844%0.9715.7
Dust21747%1.0518.1
Anubis1457%1.2216.9
Ancient1040%0.9614.3
Cache771%1.2619.9
Nuke367%0.6610.3
Overpass2100%1.6020.5
Inferno20%1.0520.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.1%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.6%Spray accuracy
71.8%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
583msReaction time
21.1%T opening success
45.8%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
7.89HE damage / grenade
8.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.1196% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4417 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.0693% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0413%27 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0316%26 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0212%26 Aug
eldorado9–40.0614%23 Aug
cache13–100.048%22 Aug
dust213–90.059%18 Aug
anubis13–60.0313%13 Aug
inferno1–9-0.1222%13 Aug
anubis13–5-0.033%13 Aug
cache9–13-0.0715%13 Aug
train13–30.1124%13 Aug
mirage4–130.0316%13 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0116%12 Aug
dust213–30.0013%12 Aug
dust24–13-0.0316%11 Aug
dust213–80.0211%10 Aug
mirage13–00.083%10 Aug
dust213–40.0525%10 Aug
office9–13-0.0915%9 Aug
train6–130.0822%9 Aug
office13–8-0.059%9 Aug
dust210–130.1016%7 Aug
mirage1–130.047%7 Aug
dust213–9-0.0114%7 Aug
mirage3–13-0.103%6 Aug
debris6–90.0214%6 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0414%5 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0114%5 Aug
ancient14–160.0012%5 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0717%31 Jul
dust23–13-0.1122%31 Jul
dust216–130.015%26 Jul
anubis12–120.0613%26 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0015%26 Jul
dust26–13-0.098%26 Jul
nuke5–9-0.0319%25 Jul
cache13–3-0.019%24 Jul
dust213–70.0714%24 Jul
anubis13–4-0.018%22 Jul
mirage13–11-0.039%21 Jul
mirage1–13-0.034%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0815%18 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0127%18 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0126%16 Jul
inferno9–130.0218%15 Jul
dust210–13-0.025%14 Jul
ancient7–13-0.048%14 Jul
cache5–13-0.0210%14 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0724%14 Jul
mirage8–13-0.078%13 Jul
eldorado3–90.0232%13 Jul
debris2–9-0.179%13 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0214%11 Jul
mirage12–120.0411%11 Jul
dust213–110.0420%11 Jul
shelter13–80.0521%11 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0410%11 Jul
fachwerk10–130.0314%10 Jul
shelter11–130.0814%9 Jul
cache7–13-0.0313%9 Jul
dust213–10-0.0015%7 Jul
cache16–120.0419%7 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0316%6 Jul
nuke2–13-0.089%5 Jul
mirage13–60.0315%3 Jul
nuke5–9-0.0210%3 Jul
dust213–70.0711%2 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0110%2 Jul
mirage13–100.0710%1 Jul
train13–90.068%1 Jul
mirage13–70.039%1 Jul
dust212–120.054%27 Jun
mirage1–130.025%27 Jun
dust210–13-0.0213%27 Jun
dust210–130.065%26 Jun
mirage5–13-0.049%26 Jun
mirage13–70.1311%26 Jun
cache9–13-0.003%26 Jun
ancient6–130.035%25 Jun
mirage13–70.1314%25 Jun
dust23–13-0.0621%25 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0412%25 Jun
nuke2–9-0.049%24 Jun
inferno3–9-0.17100%21 Jun
train13–20.0921%21 Jun
ancient10–130.048%21 Jun
nuke3–9-0.1614%20 Jun
mirage12–120.0113%19 Jun
inferno6–9-0.0810%14 Jun
cache8–13-0.0114%14 Jun
ancient13–110.0714%14 Jun
ancient13–100.0819%14 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0417%13 Jun
dust213–80.059%12 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0214%12 Jun
nuke9–70.0116%7 Jun
mirage10–130.078%7 Jun
dust213–100.0322%7 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0123%7 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0124%7 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →