cOnE09 — CS2 Stats

76561198204680532[U:1:244414804]

916Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,985Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2305 of 6915 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,985Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 21,985
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,015 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning58

Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateWLWWWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5

Aggression9.2

Utility6.4

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels3.8

Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning5.8

Utility6.4

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels3.8

Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time623ms+36ms

first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms

Headshot accuracy21.2%−2.0%

first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–8

13–3Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 31% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	27	14–13	52%	0.03
dust2	B	18	9–9	50%	0.01
inferno	S	17	11–6	65%	0.03
nuke	D	16	5–11	31%	0.00
cache	C	11	4–7	36%	0.01
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	0.08
anubis	S	5	4–1	80%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

183Matches

55%Win rate

1.28Avg K/D

91.3ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	26	35%	1.30	18.2
Cache	16	50%	1.24	19.1
Dust2	14	57%	1.22	20.4
Inferno	11	55%	1.26	14.1
Nuke	8	50%	1.05	14.5
Anubis	8	75%	1.49	18.5
Ancient	6	33%	1.19	17.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy

39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.5%Spray accuracy

84.6%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

605msReaction time

36.7%T opening success

54.0%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

10.7%Flash assists

12.26HE damage / grenade

11.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.6563% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–10	0.11	26%	22 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	18%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.07	18%	22 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.09	32%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.07	25%	11 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	15%	7 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	16%	6 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.00	16%	6 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	25%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	20%	5 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	27%	5 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	10%	5 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.01	20%	4 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.07	18%	3 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	23%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.09	32%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.08	18%	1 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	15%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.10	19%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	22%	26 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	16%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	26%	25 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.06	12%	25 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.10	22%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.09	18%	25 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.01	22%	24 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.02	18%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.07	24%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.11	35%	22 Jul →
cache	13–16	0.07	28%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.12	24%	16 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.09	15%	15 Jul →
dust2	9–2	0.11	25%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	26%	14 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	29%	14 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.06	22%	14 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.01	20%	14 Jul →
mirage	2–13	0.01	29%	14 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.05	32%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	18%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.00	24%	14 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.00	22%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.12	35%	13 Jul →
cache	1–4	-0.03	17%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.06	39%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.12	24%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.16	27%	10 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.00	14%	9 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	22%	9 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.00	31%	9 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.07	27%	8 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.04	19%	8 Jul →
anubis	12–12	0.03	22%	6 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.03	19%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.10	14%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	39%	3 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	31%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.00	11%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.07	27%	1 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.04	22%	30 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.05	29%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–5	-0.06	13%	25 Jun →
inferno	13–6	0.08	17%	25 Jun →
mirage	3–13	0.04	16%	23 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.08	24%	23 Jun →
dust2	15–15	0.08	24%	23 Jun →
cache	1–13	-0.06	6%	21 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.06	20%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.04	29%	20 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.11	23%	19 Jun →
mirage	16–13	0.08	13%	18 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.02	36%	18 Jun →
dust2	12–16	0.01	20%	17 Jun →
inferno	8–13	0.02	29%	16 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.01	23%	15 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.04	24%	15 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.07	30%	15 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	2%	10 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.08	19%	10 Jun →
ancient	7–13	0.04	14%	9 Jun →
nuke	2–13	-0.02	29%	9 Jun →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	19%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.09	22%	9 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.05	29%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.03	19%	8 Jun →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	18%	8 Jun →
anubis	13–6	0.03	27%	7 Jun →
nuke	12–16	-0.04	17%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.06	50%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.09	37%	6 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	37%	6 Jun →
nuke	12–16	-0.02	20%	4 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.00	26%	3 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.04	14%	2 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	23%	2 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.01	20%	31 May →
mirage	16–14	0.06	27%	31 May →
mirage	13–8	0.04	13%	31 May →
dust2	5–13	0.03	11%	31 May →
nuke	8–13	0.09	26%	31 May →