Shorse

Shorse — CS2 Stats

76561198204363988[U:1:244098260]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

454Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,154Pink band · top ~8.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6266 of 14335 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShorseFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,154 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning55
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43516Last 10043%Win rateLWLWWTLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression5.0
Utility5.0
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.5
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact9.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time618ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy13.7%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 13.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — vertigo 13–3
132Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 78% over 9anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2213959%0.02
dust2C2191243%0.02
cacheD1641225%0.01
nukeC114736%0.03
ancientS97278%-0.01
anubisD71614%-0.02
infernoD62433%-0.02
overpass31233%0.02
office2020%0.07
vertigo21150%0.08
shelter110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

49Matches
49%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
100.4ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2450%2.2721.8
Mirage450%1.2115.0
Anubis367%1.2717.3
Cache367%1.5222.3
Nuke250%2.1617.5
Inferno250%1.5722.0
Vertigo1100%1.3818.0
Ancient1100%1.0017.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
606msReaction time
21.1%T opening success
48.5%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
15.01HE damage / grenade
5.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.1574% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4542 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.0563% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office11–130.0413%23 Aug
nuke13–60.1111%21 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0116%16 Aug
mirage13–80.0017%16 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0014%14 Aug
mirage15–150.0213%11 Aug
cache13–16-0.0214%7 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0413%6 Aug
dust211–130.069%5 Aug
dust215–15-0.0214%3 Aug
mirage13–80.0217%3 Aug
nuke6–130.0227%2 Aug
mirage10–130.0425%2 Aug
ancient13–4-0.128%2 Aug
cache6–13-0.058%2 Aug
mirage13–40.0918%2 Aug
ancient13–11-0.037%2 Aug
cache15–15-0.0217%31 Jul
dust213–50.0614%28 Jul
dust213–90.0216%28 Jul
dust213–7-0.0110%28 Jul
nuke11–130.0812%28 Jul
ancient13–80.0120%28 Jul
cache13–80.0211%28 Jul
dust210–130.0319%26 Jul
nuke13–90.0624%26 Jul
mirage13–100.008%17 Jul
mirage13–20.032%17 Jul
dust213–100.059%15 Jul
dust213–110.0215%14 Jul
cache13–80.0413%14 Jul
mirage3–130.019%14 Jul
mirage13–100.018%13 Jul
cache7–13-0.0114%13 Jul
nuke6–130.028%13 Jul
mirage13–70.0511%13 Jul
shelter13–50.099%12 Jul
cache9–130.069%12 Jul
ancient13–60.088%12 Jul
ancient13–30.0712%12 Jul
cache13–100.047%12 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0316%11 Jul
cache7–130.0411%11 Jul
cache10–130.046%11 Jul
mirage13–8-0.005%11 Jul
office10–130.1113%11 Jul
cache1–13-0.0115%11 Jul
cache13–100.017%11 Jul
dust213–100.1110%9 Jul
dust213–30.0915%9 Jul
dust28–130.0215%9 Jul
cache7–130.0023%9 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0117%9 Jul
dust213–110.0319%7 Jul
cache8–130.1514%6 Jul
cache12–120.0412%6 Jul
mirage13–30.0214%6 Jul
overpass9–130.0216%5 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0818%5 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0113%3 Jul
overpass13–30.0814%3 Jul
overpass4–13-0.0315%3 Jul
anubis10–13-0.062%1 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0315%30 Jun
anubis15–150.014%28 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0310%27 Jun
dust210–130.088%26 Jun
mirage15–150.0916%26 Jun
dust211–13-0.0126%26 Jun
inferno13–50.0110%24 Jun
mirage13–30.1525%24 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0114%21 Jun
dust211–13-0.0214%21 Jun
dust210–13-0.0022%20 Jun
dust29–130.0313%17 Jun
dust210–13-0.0118%15 Jun
nuke4–6-0.0712%15 Jun
nuke13–80.079%14 Jun
mirage13–5-0.017%14 Jun
inferno1–10-0.0810%14 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0414%11 Jun
inferno6–13-0.005%11 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0618%10 Jun
ancient13–6-0.0317%8 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0020%8 Jun
dust213–10-0.0112%7 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0011%7 Jun
dust212–16-0.0210%7 Jun
vertigo13–30.1613%7 Jun
mirage13–50.0411%7 Jun
mirage13–100.0416%3 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0016%3 Jun
dust21–9-0.0514%2 Jun
vertigo7–130.0020%2 Jun
cache5–13-0.0918%31 May
anubis13–6-0.0011%28 May
mirage10–13-0.0120%28 May
mirage10–13-0.029%27 May
nuke2–70.0533%27 May
anubis11–130.0613%27 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →