ässä — CS2 Stats
76561198202424902[U:1:242159174]
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 9 median | Level 10 median | vs Level 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 61.3% | 49.0% | 52.0% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 17.2% | 13.1% | 13.7% | above |
| Kill/death ratio | 0.71 | 1.08 | 1.08 | 0.37 short |
| Match win rate | 45.4% | 46.9% | 48.8% | 3.4% short |
This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity
Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.
Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 51 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 58 | 50% | 0.86 | 13.2 |
| Nuke | 44 | 68% | 0.93 | 14.0 |
| Ancient | 36 | 47% | 0.86 | 13.8 |
| Vertigo | 29 | 38% | 0.98 | 15.3 |
| Anubis | 26 | 50% | 0.90 | 13.7 |
| Inferno | 21 | 52% | 1.02 | 17.1 |
| Dust2 | 18 | 44% | 1.04 | 17.2 |
| Overpass | 11 | 45% | 0.86 | 14.6 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 16.7182% — below the 40% mark we flag