G.E.N — CS2 Stats

76561198197704395[U:1:237438667]Steam profile ↗

256Tracked matches63%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,732Purple band · top ~21.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#19767 of 35625 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

16,732Peak Premier on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 16,732
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,268 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning55

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–40–2Last 10058%Win rateWLLWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression5.5

Utility5.6

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels3.5

Clutch5.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: higher opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning5.5

Utility5.6

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels3.5

Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time534ms+2ms

first ⅓ avg 532ms → last ⅓ avg 534ms

Headshot accuracy19.0%−0.3%

first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — cache 13–2

13–1Biggest win — cache

10Longest win streak

6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	26	13–13	50%	-0.00
cache	A	18	11–7	61%	0.02
inferno	A	16	10–6	63%	0.00
nuke	A	15	9–6	60%	0.02
mirage	A	9	5–4	56%	0.01
anubis	S	7	5–2	71%	-0.01
dust2	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.01
overpass	—	4	3–1	75%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

157Matches

48%Win rate

0.90Avg K/D

70.1ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	26	54%	0.98	14.6
Inferno	16	44%	0.89	13.0
Cache	14	64%	1.20	13.1
Mirage	12	58%	0.88	12.3
Dust2	9	56%	1.02	14.7
Anubis	6	50%	0.98	12.3
Nuke	6	17%	0.87	13.0
Overpass	4	50%	1.15	13.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy

32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.7%Spray accuracy

78.1%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

538msReaction time

39.7%T opening success

48.1%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

9.1%Flash assists

10.81HE damage / grenade

9.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4466 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.7371% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	8–3	0.11	27%	28 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	11%	25 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.00	25%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	19%	24 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.10	39%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	17%	23 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	13%	20 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.04	14%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.01	13%	19 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	27%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	13%	18 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	20%	18 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.02	15%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	24%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–9	-0.05	23%	15 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.12	21%	13 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.00	22%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.10	15%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	5%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.00	23%	8 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.03	12%	8 Aug →
nuke	0–13	-0.04	30%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	16%	8 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.09	14%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.03	18%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.08	15%	6 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	22%	6 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.03	14%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	28%	2 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.01	20%	1 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.01	22%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.03	13%	28 Jul →
ancient	16–13	0.04	17%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.09	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.05	7%	26 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.08	29%	26 Jul →
overpass	13–10	-0.01	11%	26 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	11%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.09	27%	26 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	11%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	20%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	19%	23 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.02	10%	22 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.02	28%	21 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.02	22%	21 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	19%	18 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	12%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.10	14%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.05	15%	18 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.06	19%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.04	9%	15 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	11%	15 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.06	8%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.06	19%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	20%	12 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.05	24%	12 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	11%	11 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	25%	11 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.01	20%	10 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.05	20%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.07	15%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.11	14%	9 Jul →
cache	2–6	0.00	0%	9 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	33%	9 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	9%	5 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.14	38%	4 Jul →
overpass	13–6	0.10	22%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.06	17%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	27%	4 Jul →
nuke	13–2	-0.00	19%	4 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.05	21%	4 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.03	20%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.08	18%	3 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.17	26%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.04	28%	29 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	20%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–8	-0.07	11%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	23%	25 Jun →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	29%	20 Jun →
anubis	12–12	-0.02	16%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	12%	17 Jun →
cache	13–16	-0.08	15%	17 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.09	22%	16 Jun →
overpass	13–11	-0.00	18%	13 Jun →
ancient	10–13	0.06	12%	13 Jun →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	17%	12 Jun →
nuke	3–13	-0.07	18%	9 Jun →
cache	0–13	-0.04	0%	9 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	11%	4 Jun →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	27%	2 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.08	39%	31 May →
dust2	13–10	0.02	19%	31 May →
inferno	4–9	-0.14	22%	30 May →
cache	13–8	-0.01	20%	26 May →
dust2	13–10	0.01	20%	24 May →
overpass	10–13	0.01	20%	24 May →
anubis	13–7	0.04	28%	20 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.09	7%	19 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	11%	5 May →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	21%	5 May →