RugPool — CS2 Stats

76561198194017158[U:1:233751430]

1,286Tracked matches26%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.8 Learning
Premier CS Rating13,332Blue band · top ~37.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18096 of 26790 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 1,157 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

13,332Peak Premier on CSDB
1,157Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,157
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 44 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 13,332
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,668 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRugPoolFACEITLevel 3 · 1,157 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER13,332 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,157csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning40
Utility25

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD434710Last 10043%Win rateWLLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2
Aggression6.2
Utility2.5
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 607ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.0
Utility2.5
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time609ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — cache 13–7
131Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 48% over 33ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB33161748%0.01
mirageB29141548%0.00
dust2D1551033%-0.02
infernoD103730%-0.03
ancientD72529%-0.01
nuke31233%-0.02
anubis32167%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

623Matches
48%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
86.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11348%1.0117.4
Dust27849%1.0315.9
Inferno5347%0.9615.7
Ancient1553%1.0416.1
Nuke1346%0.8015.4
Train1040%1.1120.6
Cache875%1.2014.6
Anubis729%0.9314.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.5%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
12.9°Preaim
607msReaction time
37.1%T opening success
44.0%CT opening success
0.30Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
7.44HE damage / grenade
2.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.9011° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2965 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.0824%27 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0817%26 Aug
inferno9–130.0332%22 Aug
dust213–100.0023%21 Aug
mirage4–130.0316%17 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0539%15 Aug
cache8–13-0.0415%14 Aug
dust210–13-0.0326%14 Aug
cache8–13-0.0722%13 Aug
cache7–13-0.0824%13 Aug
cache12–12-0.0025%13 Aug
dust212–16-0.0024%13 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0624%13 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0816%12 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0321%12 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0613%12 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0125%12 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0321%12 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0627%12 Aug
cache4–13-0.127%12 Aug
inferno6–130.0127%11 Aug
mirage6–130.0722%11 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0331%11 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0432%11 Aug
cache15–150.0115%11 Aug
dust22–5-0.110%11 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0627%10 Aug
mirage13–90.0117%10 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0121%10 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0029%10 Aug
nuke13–1-0.0145%10 Aug
dust215–15-0.0625%10 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0226%10 Aug
ancient13–50.0516%10 Aug
cache10–13-0.0118%10 Aug
cache8–13-0.0520%10 Aug
cache8–13-0.0228%10 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0237%8 Aug
cache13–70.0232%8 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0015%8 Aug
inferno2–4-0.150%8 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0231%8 Aug
cache13–70.1219%8 Aug
mirage13–50.0633%8 Aug
dust210–130.0337%6 Aug
cache13–10.1025%6 Aug
mirage7–130.0324%6 Aug
dust213–30.0431%6 Aug
cache6–130.0030%6 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0123%6 Aug
cache13–80.0137%6 Aug
mirage13–90.0928%6 Aug
mirage13–90.0226%5 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0117%5 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0520%5 Aug
cache0–8-0.0614%5 Aug
dust213–60.0424%4 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0325%4 Aug
dust29–13-0.0620%4 Aug
cache13–80.0717%3 Aug
mirage10–130.0426%3 Aug
cache11–130.0631%2 Aug
cache13–7-0.0242%2 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0225%2 Aug
dust26–130.0118%2 Aug
dust26–13-0.0121%2 Aug
mirage13–100.0422%2 Aug
ancient16–120.0416%2 Aug
inferno13–70.0525%1 Aug
mirage7–130.0220%1 Aug
dust21–13-0.0629%1 Aug
cache15–150.0324%1 Aug
mirage16–130.0320%1 Aug
cache13–20.1023%31 Jul
cache8–130.0218%31 Jul
dust29–13-0.0921%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0024%31 Jul
ancient15–150.0321%31 Jul
cache4–00.1033%31 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0319%31 Jul
mirage6–130.0827%31 Jul
cache10–13-0.0627%31 Jul
cache13–10.0527%30 Jul
cache13–10.0518%30 Jul
cache12–12-0.0217%30 Jul
mirage13–90.0422%30 Jul
cache13–9-0.0316%29 Jul
dust213–60.0621%29 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0417%29 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0216%29 Jul
cache13–11-0.0219%29 Jul
dust213–110.0024%28 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0412%28 Jul
cache12–120.0620%28 Jul
cache13–80.0243%28 Jul
cache13–90.035%28 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0925%27 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0521%27 Jul
cache13–4-0.0519%27 Jul
cache13–70.0115%26 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →