CaptainDerwin

CaptainDerwin — CS2 Stats

76561198188991233[U:1:228725505]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,871Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 Developing
Premier CS Rating9,064Light Blue band · top ~59.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#42332 of 57926 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

9,075Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 11 below peak (9,075)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 936 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCaptainDerwinFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER9,064 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning61
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateLWWWTLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.3
Aggression8.9
Utility3.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.4
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning6.1
Utility3.6
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time615ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms
Headshot accuracy12.3%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 13.0% → last ⅓ avg 12.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — nuke 13–5
131Biggest win — nuke
7Longest win streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 61% over 18infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA25151060%-0.01
nukeA1811761%0.00
infernoD134931%-0.01
cacheC135838%-0.02
anubisA116555%0.00
mirageB105550%-0.02
dust2C104640%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

54Matches
46%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
75.2ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis1338%0.8812.8
Mirage1267%1.1416.8
Train850%0.9613.5
Ancient743%0.6912.6
Nuke540%1.1314.8
Vertigo2100%1.3418.5
Inferno250%0.7112.0
Dust210%0.7414.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.1%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
613msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
56.9%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
12.37HE damage / grenade
1.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.0613% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4217 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.3846% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.0512%31 Aug
ancient13–20.0614%31 Aug
ancient13–100.0321%30 Aug
inferno13–70.1410%29 Aug
anubis15–15-0.016%29 Aug
dust29–13-0.085%28 Aug
ancient13–80.0215%28 Aug
dust210–13-0.0215%27 Aug
mirage13–90.0028%27 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0128%26 Aug
ancient9–130.0018%25 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0213%25 Aug
mirage15–150.0211%23 Aug
ancient10–130.122%23 Aug
cache12–16-0.015%23 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0412%23 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0413%22 Aug
anubis13–110.008%22 Aug
anubis13–11-0.019%22 Aug
mirage15–150.0111%22 Aug
nuke13–7-0.067%21 Aug
dust213–3-0.0510%21 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0320%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.0712%20 Aug
ancient13–4-0.034%19 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0019%19 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0716%18 Aug
ancient9–13-0.069%17 Aug
nuke8–130.0216%16 Aug
anubis13–10-0.042%16 Aug
cache11–13-0.056%16 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0314%16 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0017%16 Aug
cache13–5-0.0614%16 Aug
cache10–13-0.059%15 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0319%15 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0119%15 Aug
ancient13–100.0611%15 Aug
cache16–130.0014%15 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0811%14 Aug
nuke7–130.016%14 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0311%14 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0611%12 Aug
cache6–13-0.0321%12 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0220%11 Aug
nuke13–80.0420%11 Aug
ancient13–110.068%10 Aug
nuke13–50.176%10 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0618%7 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0119%6 Aug
inferno4–13-0.1017%5 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0114%5 Aug
cache10–13-0.0415%4 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0510%3 Aug
anubis14–160.0513%3 Aug
nuke8–130.0312%2 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0611%2 Aug
cache13–9-0.0027%2 Aug
mirage13–20.0227%1 Aug
inferno13–60.0329%1 Aug
dust216–120.0213%1 Aug
ancient13–60.0112%1 Aug
dust24–13-0.0422%1 Aug
inferno13–9-0.105%1 Aug
nuke11–130.0117%1 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0115%1 Aug
nuke13–7-0.039%1 Aug
nuke13–110.0210%1 Aug
dust24–13-0.0717%31 Jul
inferno13–30.0719%31 Jul
anubis11–13-0.077%31 Jul
inferno7–130.0118%30 Jul
dust216–130.0211%30 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0414%29 Jul
nuke5–13-0.075%29 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0623%28 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0111%26 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0111%26 Jul
anubis13–80.019%26 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0313%26 Jul
cache13–9-0.0510%25 Jul
dust213–11-0.0420%25 Jul
nuke13–1-0.0113%25 Jul
ancient13–80.0326%25 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0113%24 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0411%23 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0711%23 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0318%23 Jul
cache8–130.0117%21 Jul
ancient15–150.0211%21 Jul
anubis16–120.089%19 Jul
nuke11–130.0610%16 Jul
cache10–130.0120%15 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0121%15 Jul
nuke13–5-0.009%15 Jul
anubis6–130.059%15 Jul
dust26–13-0.0511%14 Jul
cache13–8-0.040%14 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0412%14 Jul
cache11–130.029%12 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →