cute yaya — CS2 Stats

CN76561198185457818[U:1:225192090]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

387Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.6 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,209Purple band · top ~23.6% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12733 of 21174 tracked

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning52

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateLLWWLLTLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5

Aggression6.6

Utility4.1

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.4

Clutch6.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning5.2

Utility4.1

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time549ms−48ms

first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms

Headshot accuracy17.5%+2.6%

first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — nuke 9–6

13–1Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 77% over 13cacheWeakest map · 11% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	31	12–19	39%	-0.00
mirage	A	22	12–10	55%	0.02
nuke	A	13	8–5	62%	0.02
ancient	S	13	10–3	77%	0.03
cache	D	9	1–8	11%	0.01
inferno	B	6	3–3	50%	0.03
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
poseidon	—	2	0–2	0%	0.03
vertigo	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

47Matches

66%Win rate

1.68Avg K/D

106.0ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

53%1v1 clutch win

48%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	14	86%	2.28	21.9
Mirage	9	78%	1.81	17.9
Ancient	5	80%	1.30	18.6
Nuke	3	67%	1.97	25.7
Inferno	2	100%	1.38	18.5
Overpass	2	100%	3.64	21.5
Cache	2	50%	0.82	14.5
Anubis	1	0%	0.41	7.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy

34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.6%Spray accuracy

78.0%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

543msReaction time

25.9%T opening success

53.3%CT opening success

0.38Enemies flashed / flash

2.6%Flash assists

8.57HE damage / grenade

8.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.379 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.8742% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	11–13	0.00	15%	23 Aug →
nuke	0–13	-0.04	29%	23 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.02	12%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.07	10%	20 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.00	21%	20 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	24%	19 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.04	16%	19 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.02	24%	19 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.00	20%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.05	11%	19 Aug →
inferno	9–6	0.11	14%	19 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.02	21%	17 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.05	23%	17 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.02	14%	17 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.04	15%	17 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	13%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.04	16%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.01	18%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.13	16%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.08	28%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.07	14%	9 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.04	13%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	12%	9 Aug →
mirage	9–2	0.06	7%	9 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	30%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.05	24%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.03	14%	8 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.06	27%	8 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.03	16%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.01	13%	8 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.09	16%	8 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.01	15%	5 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.01	18%	5 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	15%	5 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.05	25%	5 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.03	24%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	16%	26 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.01	15%	26 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	23%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.00	10%	25 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.00	13%	25 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	16%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	23%	23 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.02	20%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	11%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.04	15%	23 Jul →
nuke	9–6	0.20	23%	23 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	19%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.04	15%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	24%	21 Jul →
poseidon	3–9	-0.05	12%	21 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	21%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.11	25%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.05	8%	20 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	18%	20 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.04	24%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	13%	17 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	19%	17 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.07	36%	17 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.00	18%	17 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.01	20%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.03	4%	6 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	24%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.09	30%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.04	16%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.08	21%	3 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.04	11%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.04	10%	28 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	6%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–8	0.04	12%	28 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	6%	28 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.09	11%	28 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.06	13%	28 Jun →
ancient	5–3	-0.02	7%	28 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	13%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–4	0.07	7%	26 Jun →
poseidon	8–8	0.10	27%	15 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.07	20%	15 Jun →
nuke	9–3	0.04	12%	15 Jun →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	19%	11 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.01	12%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.08	24%	7 Jun →
nuke	13–7	-0.03	28%	7 Jun →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	24%	7 Jun →
vertigo	3–9	0.01	25%	7 Jun →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	15%	6 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.12	21%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.09	0%	6 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	12%	6 Jun →
vertigo	5–9	-0.09	6%	6 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.05	13%	6 Jun →
dust2	16–14	0.04	23%	6 Jun →
inferno	9–4	0.15	13%	6 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	11%	4 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.11	20%	4 Jun →
ancient	5–13	0.08	22%	4 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	18%	4 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	17%	4 Jun →
inferno	8–8	-0.07	14%	4 Jun →