pollo facil — CS2 Stats

76561198180197295[U:1:219931567]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

136Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating6,759Light Blue band · top ~70.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#15023 of 19800 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63

Positioning52

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateTWWLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3

Aggression7.3

Utility4.1

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.2

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 682ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3

Positioning5.2

Utility4.1

Mechanics8.7

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact9.3

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.03

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time689ms−53ms

first ⅓ avg 742ms → last ⅓ avg 689ms

Headshot accuracy18.8%+6.5%

first ⅓ avg 12.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — mirage 13–4

13–3Biggest win — nuke

4Longest win streak

5–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 11dust2Weakest map · 41% over 29

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	29	12–17	41%	-0.02
mirage	B	28	13–15	46%	-0.01
nuke	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.00
inferno	S	11	8–3	73%	-0.04
cache	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.01
ancient	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.04
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.08
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches

50%Win rate

0.26Avg K/D

—ADR

20%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy

32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

32.3%Spray accuracy

89.2%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

682msReaction time

30.4%T opening success

47.6%CT opening success

0.62Enemies flashed / flash

3.6%Flash assists

7.39HE damage / grenade

2.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.8471 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.393% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	12–12	0.00	9%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.10	8%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	12%	29 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.08	11%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.05	14%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	24%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–3	-0.07	14%	29 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.01	9%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.04	11%	27 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.07	23%	27 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.02	19%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	11%	27 Jul →
ancient	16–13	0.00	11%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.03	19%	27 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.01	19%	27 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.07	18%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.05	13%	26 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	15%	26 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.06	26%	26 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.05	17%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.06	15%	25 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.10	29%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.04	21%	25 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	24%	25 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	33%	24 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.08	19%	24 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	16%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	48%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.00	24%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.06	21%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.00	26%	23 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.07	32%	23 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	9%	21 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	9%	21 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	33%	21 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.08	23%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.06	13%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	23%	20 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.11	25%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	18%	20 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.04	19%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.06	21%	18 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	6%	17 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.01	22%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.05	15%	17 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.07	21%	17 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.06	24%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.01	13%	16 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.06	0%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	25%	16 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.06	14%	16 Jul →
dust2	1–8	0.04	6%	16 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	14%	16 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.01	16%	15 Jul →
nuke	3–13	0.00	18%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.12	14%	15 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.06	25%	15 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.09	9%	15 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	20%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.03	9%	10 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	6%	10 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.10	19%	10 Jul →
dust2	5–9	0.01	43%	22 Dec →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	27%	22 Dec →
dust2	16–13	-0.00	21%	22 Dec →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	11%	22 Dec →
nuke	6–13	-0.02	31%	22 Dec →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	10%	22 Dec →
vertigo	10–13	-0.04	15%	22 Dec →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	16%	22 Dec →
nuke	0–3	0.02	15%	21 Dec →
anubis	3–9	-0.10	0%	21 Dec →
inferno	13–4	-0.05	11%	21 Dec →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	22%	21 Dec →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	14%	21 Dec →
inferno	9–13	-0.13	22%	20 Dec →
mirage	13–16	-0.04	12%	20 Dec →
mirage	13–4	0.12	33%	20 Dec →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	4%	20 Dec →
mirage	13–10	0.10	11%	1 Dec →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	14%	1 Dec →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	6%	1 Dec →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	12%	1 Dec →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	7%	1 Dec →
ancient	13–6	-0.07	10%	1 Dec →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	20%	30 Nov →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	10%	30 Nov →
mirage	13–7	0.01	19%	30 Nov →
inferno	16–13	-0.07	10%	29 Nov →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	13%	29 Nov →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	3%	29 Nov →
mirage	13–5	-0.05	6%	29 Nov →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	9%	29 Nov →
mirage	7–13	-0.13	10%	29 Nov →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	14%	29 Nov →
overpass	5–13	0.01	14%	25 Jan →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	17%	25 Jan →
dust2	13–8	0.00	11%	24 Jan →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	7%	23 Jan →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	13%	23 Jan →