CrabbyS — CS2 Stats

76561198178117802[U:1:217852074]✓ No bans

761Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.6 Learning
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCrabbySFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim25
Positioning37
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD464410Last 10046%Win rateWLTLLLTLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.5
Aggression1.5
Utility3.2
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 65% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 21% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 739ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.5
Positioning3.7
Utility3.2
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact6.3

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.05
Reaction time748ms+40ms
first ⅓ avg 709ms → last ⅓ avg 748ms
Headshot accuracy14.6%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 11.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.04Best rating — cache 6–13
130Biggest win — overpass
5Longest win streak
72In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B35171849%-0.05
mirageB32151747%-0.04
cacheA85363%-0.05
anubisD72529%-0.05
infernoD62433%-0.06
ancientD62433%-0.04
overpass43175%-0.04
train1010%-0.02
nuke1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
24.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
26.5%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
739msReaction time
21.3%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
8.91HE damage / grenade
1.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 738.8901ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4736 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.2975% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–5-0.0523%3 Aug
dust29–13-0.0615%3 Aug
dust215–15-0.0624%31 Jul
mirage5–13-0.1210%31 Jul
anubis8–130.0013%31 Jul
dust21–13-0.0811%31 Jul
train12–12-0.0212%28 Jul
cache6–130.0415%28 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0714%27 Jul
dust211–13-0.0610%21 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0810%20 Jul
cache13–9-0.1013%20 Jul
dust210–13-0.0431%20 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0417%18 Jul
mirage13–30.0225%16 Jul
dust213–6-0.0430%16 Jul
mirage13–3-0.019%16 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0510%16 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0212%14 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0415%14 Jul
dust27–13-0.0314%14 Jul
dust213–8-0.0319%11 Jul
dust21–13-0.130%11 Jul
dust213–9-0.0514%11 Jul
dust29–13-0.0933%6 Jul
dust216–14-0.0013%29 Jun
overpass13–9-0.037%27 Jun
anubis13–10-0.0518%27 Jun
dust216–14-0.0911%26 Jun
mirage13–9-0.052%26 Jun
dust28–13-0.0611%25 Jun
mirage13–1-0.037%25 Jun
dust213–110.0316%25 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0413%22 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0921%22 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0110%15 Jun
dust210–130.0113%12 Jun
dust213–10-0.0515%10 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0223%9 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0210%9 Jun
dust213–3-0.0414%8 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0211%8 Jun
inferno13–5-0.048%4 Jun
mirage8–13-0.046%4 Jun
overpass7–13-0.0410%2 Jun
dust24–13-0.115%25 May
ancient6–13-0.0612%25 May
dust23–13-0.0524%23 May
mirage12–12-0.0618%14 May
nuke1–2-0.030%14 May
mirage7–13-0.0725%12 May
ancient16–14-0.0517%11 May
mirage7–13-0.1027%11 May
dust213–6-0.0713%9 May
dust213–3-0.0317%9 May
mirage13–6-0.0124%9 May
inferno6–13-0.060%8 May
mirage3–13-0.100%8 May
mirage13–7-0.0131%8 May
dust29–130.015%8 May
dust24–13-0.0914%8 May
dust213–5-0.066%7 May
anubis10–13-0.069%7 May
dust29–13-0.0318%5 May
ancient16–13-0.0116%4 May
cache6–13-0.134%30 Apr
cache9–13-0.069%29 Apr
cache13–10-0.072%29 Apr
cache13–20.0129%29 Apr
cache13–9-0.0717%29 Apr
cache13–5-0.0220%29 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0715%24 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0425%24 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0413%22 Apr
anubis8–13-0.093%22 Apr
dust25–13-0.079%22 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0711%21 Apr
dust215–15-0.0411%20 Apr
mirage15–15-0.038%18 Apr
overpass13–0-0.0213%18 Apr
dust27–13-0.074%18 Apr
ancient15–15-0.0711%17 Apr
ancient15–15-0.047%15 Apr
dust213–7-0.0910%15 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0723%15 Apr
dust213–10-0.0415%14 Apr
inferno8–13-0.099%13 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0311%13 Apr
mirage9–13-0.067%13 Apr
dust213–7-0.083%13 Apr
mirage13–20.0119%12 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0517%12 Apr
mirage13–11-0.028%10 Apr
dust213–6-0.0218%10 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0214%10 Apr
anubis13–9-0.057%9 Apr
overpass16–14-0.0612%8 Apr
mirage13–9-0.029%8 Apr
dust213–10-0.058%8 Apr
anubis8–13-0.058%6 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →