t0ast — CS2 Stats

76561198175808625[U:1:215542897]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

725Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,560Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6445 of 23136 tracked

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSupreme Master First Class

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning53

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–42–4Last 10054%Win rateWLLWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3

Aggression7.1

Utility4.3

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels3.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.8° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning5.3

Utility4.3

Mechanics8.4

Opening Duels3.4

Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.05

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time636ms−36ms

first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms

Headshot accuracy22.7%−7.7%

first ⅓ avg 30.4% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.27Best rating — vertigo 8–1

13–1Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

4–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7mirageWeakest map · 39% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	29	16–13	55%	0.01
cache	B	19	9–10	47%	0.02
mirage	C	18	7–11	39%	0.01
inferno	A	12	7–5	58%	0.04
anubis	S	7	6–1	86%	0.04
nuke	—	4	3–1	75%	0.01
ancient	—	3	2–1	67%	0.08
train	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	0.14
boulder	—	2	1–1	50%	0.12
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy

38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.1%Spray accuracy

87.8%Counter-strafing

10.8°Preaim

648msReaction time

30.3%T opening success

57.2%CT opening success

0.39Enemies flashed / flash

12.5%Flash assists

7.51HE damage / grenade

3.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3915 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.3045% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–9	0.05	19%	27 Aug →
cache	17–19	-0.06	21%	27 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	20%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	29%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	36%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	18%	23 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.03	15%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	35%	23 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	18%	22 Aug →
dust2	1–2	-0.16	0%	22 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.04	15%	22 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.00	26%	22 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.05	27%	22 Aug →
dust2	12–3	0.07	29%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.00	12%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	36%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	17%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.03	32%	22 Aug →
nuke	11–5	0.05	22%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	17%	22 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.08	13%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.06	24%	22 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.08	21%	21 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.02	14%	21 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.02	24%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	24%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.03	17%	21 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.01	36%	21 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	14%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.09	48%	20 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.05	23%	20 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	14%	20 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.04	32%	20 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.08	33%	20 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.00	30%	20 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.00	20%	20 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.09	21%	19 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.01	22%	19 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	31%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.09	24%	18 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	18%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.09	27%	18 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	14%	18 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.06	23%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.00	39%	18 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.00	17%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.02	22%	18 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.16	29%	18 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	33%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.10	35%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.12	42%	13 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.08	20%	13 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.06	31%	12 Aug →
train	13–5	0.04	55%	12 Aug →
train	12–12	-0.02	54%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.07	23%	12 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.02	24%	11 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.16	56%	11 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.11	44%	11 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.06	26%	11 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.09	19%	11 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	22%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	23%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.01	25%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.22	43%	10 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.03	24%	10 Aug →
mirage	2–6	-0.08	50%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.07	35%	10 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.08	33%	10 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	14%	7 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.09	32%	7 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	38%	7 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	35%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.08	26%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.00	23%	5 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.05	20%	5 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	20%	5 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	35%	4 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	34%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.06	22%	4 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	13%	4 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	24%	4 Aug →
vertigo	11–0	0.00	42%	2 Aug →
vertigo	8–1	0.27	37%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.13	44%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.06	40%	26 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.08	32%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.07	29%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.11	31%	25 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.00	25%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.16	41%	25 Jul →
anubis	8–1	0.01	38%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.17	28%	25 Jul →
shelter	11–13	0.05	29%	24 Jul →
boulder	8–13	0.08	36%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.07	29%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.03	44%	24 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.00	27%	24 Jul →
boulder	13–8	0.16	14%	24 Jul →
office	8–13	0.09	34%	24 Jul →