21 — CS2 Stats

FR76561198175291670[U:1:215025942]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,002Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.3 StrongAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91

Positioning74

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–56Last 10044%Win rateWLLLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1

Aggression10.0

Utility5.9

Positioning7.4

Opening Duels5.8

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 70% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 70% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1

Positioning7.4

Utility5.9

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels5.8

Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time505ms−71ms

first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms

Headshot accuracy21.6%+0.8%

first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.31Best rating — poseidon 9–4

13–2Biggest win — anubis

4Longest win streak

10–15In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 48% over 33dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	33	16–17	48%	0.03
inferno	D	21	7–14	33%	0.00
ancient	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.00
anubis	B	13	6–7	46%	0.05
dust2	D	8	2–6	25%	-0.00
nuke	C	5	2–3	40%	0.04
cache	—	2	2–0	100%	0.02
poseidon	—	2	2–0	100%	0.25
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.22
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,730Matches

51%Win rate

1.13Avg K/D

82.7ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	233	55%	1.29	18.1
Inferno	103	54%	1.39	19.7
Ancient	86	44%	1.13	17.4
Anubis	73	52%	1.27	18.1
Dust2	69	49%	1.14	16.4
Nuke	36	42%	1.10	16.9
Overpass	27	56%	1.28	17.5
Vertigo	24	38%	1.15	16.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy

38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.8%Spray accuracy

83.0%Counter-strafing

7.5°Preaim

483msReaction time

36.5%T opening success

70.3%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

7.6%Flash assists

7.98HE damage / grenade

13.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.4891% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–11	0.05	26%	29 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	28%	29 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.02	12%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.00	26%	29 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.04	20%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.11	35%	28 Aug →
inferno	16–14	0.05	14%	28 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	16%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.07	25%	28 Aug →
inferno	6–9	0.05	34%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.07	25%	26 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	13%	26 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	14%	26 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.05	10%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–3	-0.02	9%	24 Aug →
cache	19–17	-0.03	14%	23 Aug →
poseidon	9–6	0.18	25%	22 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.21	25%	22 Aug →
inferno	2–9	-0.08	25%	22 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.06	15%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.05	28%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.04	12%	21 Aug →
vertigo	9–0	0.22	3%	20 Aug →
inferno	9–6	0.04	29%	20 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.04	25%	20 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.08	26%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.04	32%	19 Aug →
anubis	12–16	0.05	28%	19 Aug →
mirage	19–16	0.05	18%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.16	11%	19 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.08	32%	14 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.07	30%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.09	27%	14 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.09	14%	13 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	17%	13 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.02	26%	6 Aug →
nuke	3–13	0.01	24%	6 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.04	16%	3 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	10%	3 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.02	27%	30 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.10	17%	30 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.01	7%	30 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.07	24%	26 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	6%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.07	13%	26 Jul →
ancient	3–13	0.03	19%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.06	23%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.05	14%	25 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	11%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	28%	19 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	15%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–16	0.06	11%	19 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.02	33%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.00	16%	18 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.00	19%	18 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.03	20%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	8%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.02	15%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.06	6%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.01	20%	14 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	24%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.22	15%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.01	16%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	10%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.09	14%	11 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	19%	11 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	17%	8 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.10	17%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.03	24%	7 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.06	23%	7 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.06	29%	7 Jul →
anubis	12–16	0.03	20%	6 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	30%	6 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	15%	1 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.03	14%	26 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	18%	26 Jun →
mirage	19–17	0.03	13%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	2%	26 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.05	21%	20 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	18%	16 Jun →
mirage	5–13	0.01	38%	16 Jun →
ancient	16–14	0.06	17%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–2	0.06	21%	16 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.01	25%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.01	21%	13 Jun →
overpass	13–6	0.09	39%	13 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	31%	13 Jun →
inferno	6–13	0.00	14%	13 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	10%	10 Jun →
mirage	16–14	0.04	24%	10 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.09	12%	10 Jun →
ancient	13–16	-0.06	24%	10 Jun →
nuke	4–9	-0.08	9%	9 Jun →
inferno	0–9	-0.19	21%	9 Jun →
poseidon	9–4	0.31	24%	9 Jun →
inferno	6–9	0.05	35%	9 Jun →
nuke	9–2	0.23	19%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.01	12%	7 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	11%	7 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.00	38%	7 Jun →