prot3us

prot3us — CS2 Stats

US76561198170468350[U:1:210202622]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

385Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating16,363Purple band · top ~23% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#28835 of 51913 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGprot3usFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER16,363 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning42
Utility24

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53434Last 10053%Win rateLWLWTWWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim7.0
Aggression4.8
Utility2.4
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 663ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning4.2
Utility2.4
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact3.8

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time653ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 653ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — inferno 13–9
131Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 70% over 20anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2014670%-0.00
dust2C2081240%-0.01
mirageB179853%0.01
nukeA127558%0.01
cacheA116555%0.01
ancientA106460%0.01
anubisD62433%-0.03
overpass21150%-0.03
shelter1010%0.00
office1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

10Matches
60%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
65.8ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

75%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno425%0.649.5
Mirage2100%0.8211.0
Nuke2100%0.9213.0
Anubis10%0.8720.0
Ancient1100%0.699.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.5%Spray accuracy
87.6%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
663msReaction time
28.6%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
3.32HE damage / grenade
4.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3821 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.6028% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–9-0.0418%30 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0514%30 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0917%30 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0219%29 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0113%29 Aug
inferno9–30.0433%29 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0114%28 Aug
dust215–150.0210%28 Aug
dust213–60.0216%24 Aug
ancient8–130.0210%23 Aug
cache5–13-0.0611%23 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0015%22 Aug
dust213–50.0714%22 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0312%22 Aug
dust25–130.0218%17 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0215%16 Aug
inferno5–0-0.0020%16 Aug
mirage11–130.0414%14 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0324%9 Aug
cache13–5-0.0110%9 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0717%9 Aug
anubis3–13-0.1013%9 Aug
dust28–130.0126%9 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0020%8 Aug
anubis13–100.0013%8 Aug
cache13–50.0913%8 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0413%8 Aug
dust26–13-0.0226%8 Aug
cache11–13-0.0112%6 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0629%2 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0015%2 Aug
dust213–90.0417%2 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0110%2 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0120%2 Aug
dust213–8-0.0420%1 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0111%27 Jul
ancient3–130.016%27 Jul
cache6–130.0911%26 Jul
inferno9–5-0.0435%26 Jul
nuke13–9-0.018%26 Jul
nuke13–100.0015%25 Jul
dust27–13-0.0622%23 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0414%21 Jul
dust213–40.0318%21 Jul
dust213–11-0.0013%21 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0218%20 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0317%20 Jul
cache13–8-0.0410%20 Jul
ancient13–70.0713%19 Jul
cache13–8-0.0214%19 Jul
dust213–90.0213%19 Jul
cache13–8-0.0719%13 Jul
dust29–13-0.0114%13 Jul
inferno13–11-0.065%13 Jul
shelter8–130.009%11 Jul
office1–13-0.086%11 Jul
cache7–130.0127%6 Jul
nuke13–70.0315%6 Jul
nuke7–10.0625%6 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0233%6 Jul
overpass12–7-0.0024%2 Jul
mirage13–20.0714%2 Jul
nuke15–150.0418%2 Jul
dust25–13-0.108%1 Jul
ancient13–70.0920%30 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0625%30 Jun
nuke15–15-0.0118%29 Jun
inferno13–110.0927%28 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0814%28 Jun
mirage13–90.0117%28 Jun
ancient13–60.089%28 Jun
anubis13–80.0115%27 Jun
overpass3–13-0.059%27 Jun
inferno13–40.0824%27 Jun
mirage13–50.0112%25 Jun
dust211–13-0.0413%25 Jun
dust211–13-0.0123%25 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0014%24 Jun
mirage11–130.0412%23 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0323%22 Jun
inferno13–90.1118%22 Jun
dust28–130.0113%22 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0313%21 Jun
dust23–13-0.0323%21 Jun
ancient13–80.0623%21 Jun
cache11–130.0336%21 Jun
cache13–70.0720%21 Jun
mirage13–30.1017%21 Jun
inferno13–90.0220%21 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0210%21 Jun
nuke6–130.0115%21 Jun
dust210–13-0.0026%21 Jun
nuke10–130.0215%20 Jun
mirage13–90.0119%20 Jun
inferno13–10.0622%20 Jun
dust213–6-0.0321%19 Jun
mirage13–80.0514%18 Jun
nuke13–60.0316%18 Jun
mirage13–80.035%17 Jun
inferno16–14-0.0010%15 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →