dev1n — CS2 Stats

76561198168419376[U:1:208153648]

963Tracked matches28%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating13,754Blue band · top ~35% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69

Positioning54

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateLWLLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9

Aggression5.8

Utility5.9

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9

Positioning5.4

Utility5.9

Mechanics8.4

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time662ms−59ms

first ⅓ avg 722ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms

Headshot accuracy14.3%−1.2%

first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — cache 13–6

13–2Biggest win — cache

7Longest win streak

9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 38% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	23	11–12	48%	0.01
mirage	B	20	9–11	45%	-0.01
ancient	C	18	8–10	44%	0.01
dust2	B	15	8–7	53%	0.03
inferno	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.01
nuke	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
anubis	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

249Matches

52%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

82.5ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win

27%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	6	33%	0.85	16.2
Dust2	5	40%	0.80	14.6
Ancient	5	40%	0.97	15.8
Inferno	3	0%	1.19	21.0
Cache	3	0%	0.86	15.3
Nuke	1	100%	0.87	20.0
Vertigo	1	0%	0.58	11.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.3%Headshot accuracy

40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.0%Spray accuracy

87.8%Counter-strafing

12.3°Preaim

657msReaction time

32.4%T opening success

49.5%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

12.6%Flash assists

10.92HE damage / grenade

7.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 12.2509° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →
Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.2528% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	11–13	0.00	13%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	15%	18 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.00	18%	18 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.02	24%	17 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.02	15%	15 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	20%	15 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.04	18%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.06	15%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	13%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.07	12%	15 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.04	13%	11 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	19%	11 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	12%	11 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.03	19%	10 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.04	16%	10 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.07	23%	9 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.03	11%	9 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.00	22%	9 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	7%	7 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	10%	7 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.03	13%	5 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.05	20%	5 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	3%	5 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	9%	5 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.10	15%	3 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	9%	3 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.05	9%	3 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	7%	3 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.00	13%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.06	9%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.06	15%	2 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	19%	2 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.04	17%	2 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.02	9%	1 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.01	20%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	13%	1 Aug →
cache	16–12	-0.02	12%	30 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.12	19%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	11%	30 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.06	13%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.00	11%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	15%	29 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.00	16%	29 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	8%	29 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.00	10%	28 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	28%	28 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	9%	28 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.03	10%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.00	7%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	19%	25 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.02	13%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.11	17%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.03	9%	24 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.02	17%	24 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	11%	24 Jul →
dust2	7–9	0.03	12%	24 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	12%	24 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.03	10%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.07	16%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.08	11%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.04	21%	22 Jul →
cache	10–5	0.08	17%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	15%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	15%	21 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.07	8%	21 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	11%	21 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.01	14%	20 Jul →
ancient	3–7	-0.02	9%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	18%	20 Jul →
inferno	16–12	-0.03	14%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	22%	19 Jul →
mirage	2–12	-0.03	17%	19 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.00	14%	19 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	19%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.04	17%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.04	22%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	14%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.05	11%	18 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.02	15%	18 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.01	16%	17 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.03	18%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.05	15%	17 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.07	15%	17 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.02	26%	16 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.03	11%	16 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	18%	14 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.11	16%	14 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.01	21%	14 Jul →
anubis	11–2	-0.01	9%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.01	11%	14 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.03	11%	14 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.07	9%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.03	10%	13 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.00	10%	13 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.01	16%	13 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.00	22%	13 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.00	10%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.01	17%	11 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.07	30%	11 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.04	12%	11 Jul →