Carbon

Carbon — CS2 Stats

US76561198165699924[U:1:205434196]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

634Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,663Purple band · top ~25.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7887 of 12499 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCarbonFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER15,663 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning44
Utility15

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53425Last 10053%Win rateLLWWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5
Aggression4.3
Utility1.5
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 95% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.4
Utility1.5
Mechanics10.0
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time648ms−114ms
first ⅓ avg 762ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−3.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — dust2 13–5
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
104In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 15anubisWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26141254%0.01
dust2B168850%0.01
infernoS1510567%0.02
nukeB137654%0.00
ancientB126650%-0.01
cacheB105550%-0.01
anubisC73443%0.00
overpass1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,166Matches
49%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno667%0.8513.5
Mirage580%1.0914.0
Nuke560%1.3316.8
Vertigo540%0.9512.4
Anubis30%0.6810.0
Overpass1100%1.0424.0
Ancient1100%1.299.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
41.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
95.0%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
642msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
31.7%CT opening success
0.16Enemies flashed / flash
1.5%Flash assists
10.17HE damage / grenade
1.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1579 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.3752% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–13-0.0119%28 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0416%28 Aug
dust213–80.0115%27 Aug
nuke13–50.0522%27 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0113%27 Aug
nuke5–130.0225%25 Aug
cache10–13-0.0213%25 Aug
dust213–3-0.0322%25 Aug
inferno13–50.088%25 Aug
cache13–20.018%25 Aug
cache9–13-0.0011%25 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0214%25 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0913%25 Aug
mirage9–130.0313%25 Aug
inferno16–130.0311%24 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0635%24 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0617%24 Aug
inferno16–140.0222%24 Aug
dust213–60.0318%21 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0420%21 Aug
cache14–16-0.0314%21 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0113%21 Aug
cache16–13-0.0713%21 Aug
dust213–70.0113%21 Aug
dust28–13-0.0320%19 Aug
dust22–13-0.0918%19 Aug
dust29–13-0.0723%19 Aug
nuke13–20.0528%18 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0917%18 Aug
mirage13–110.0311%18 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0328%18 Aug
cache13–80.0032%16 Aug
dust25–13-0.1310%15 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0210%15 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0917%15 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0440%15 Aug
dust24–10.0450%13 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0317%13 Aug
mirage16–140.0315%13 Aug
mirage13–30.0218%13 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0119%13 Aug
dust213–60.0218%13 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0920%13 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0121%11 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0135%11 Aug
anubis9–130.0116%11 Aug
mirage13–20.0346%11 Aug
inferno13–70.0924%11 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0122%11 Aug
ancient6–13-0.047%11 Aug
mirage11–130.0015%11 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0621%11 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0024%11 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0226%11 Aug
ancient13–70.0827%11 Aug
cache5–3-0.0358%11 Aug
ancient5–11-0.0314%10 Aug
inferno12–12-0.0217%10 Aug
anubis10–130.0615%10 Aug
inferno13–110.0917%10 Aug
dust213–70.0328%10 Aug
mirage12–120.0115%10 Aug
dust212–12-0.0520%10 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0337%10 Aug
nuke8–130.0215%10 Aug
mirage13–10.0819%9 Aug
mirage7–130.0721%8 Aug
nuke5–130.0230%8 Aug
dust29–130.0322%8 Aug
nuke13–40.0822%8 Aug
anubis5–4-0.0418%8 Aug
mirage13–60.0710%7 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0415%7 Aug
mirage13–00.0221%7 Aug
dust23–100.1520%7 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0121%7 Aug
mirage13–40.0327%7 Aug
ancient13–110.0520%7 Aug
mirage13–70.0217%5 Aug
overpass12–12-0.0822%5 Aug
dust213–50.1920%5 Aug
ancient13–60.0425%4 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0215%4 Aug
anubis13–10.0318%4 Aug
cache10–130.0118%4 Aug
mirage7–130.0016%4 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0428%4 Aug
mirage13–1-0.0532%4 Aug
anubis13–40.0731%3 Aug
cache4–11-0.0028%3 Aug
mirage13–100.0512%3 Aug
dust28–130.0224%3 Aug
cache13–6-0.0134%3 Aug
inferno13–60.0414%3 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0017%2 Aug
mirage10–130.0520%2 Aug
inferno13–20.0219%2 Aug
ancient13–20.0623%1 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0420%1 Aug
mirage13–60.1624%1 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →