Makks — CS2 Stats

76561198163927334[U:1:203661606]

685Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,118Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1988 of 13287 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMakksFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,118 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning51
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55441Last 10055%Win rateWLWWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6
Aggression4.8
Utility5.0
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.1
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time582ms+12ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — dust2 13–0
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A32191359%0.01
mirageB24131154%0.00
cacheB179853%0.00
anubisA85363%0.01
infernoC73443%0.01
ancientA53260%0.01
nukeA53260%-0.00
overpass2020%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches
76%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
99.1ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1377%1.1216.6
Dust21292%1.3222.8
Anubis560%1.2121.0
Ancient367%1.0919.3
Inferno333%1.1619.7
Nuke3100%2.2920.0
Cache250%1.0414.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
90.2%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
591msReaction time
26.5%T opening success
44.2%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
7.68HE damage / grenade
4.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.4703% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–90.0935%25 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0212%25 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0219%22 Aug
cache13–50.0821%22 Aug
dust213–00.1720%18 Aug
dust213–11-0.0323%17 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0211%16 Aug
dust213–3-0.0229%15 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0322%15 Aug
cache6–130.0216%15 Aug
dust213–50.1322%12 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0118%12 Aug
cache2–13-0.0413%11 Aug
inferno13–70.0523%11 Aug
mirage8–130.0424%11 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0320%9 Aug
cache13–8-0.0227%9 Aug
nuke13–80.0523%8 Aug
dust213–90.0838%8 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0221%8 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0116%8 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0113%8 Aug
mirage13–110.0932%8 Aug
cache9–13-0.0224%7 Aug
cache13–50.0230%7 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0619%7 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0520%7 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0114%5 Aug
cache10–13-0.0325%5 Aug
dust213–9-0.0133%5 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0115%4 Aug
mirage4–130.0016%4 Aug
dust212–16-0.0219%4 Aug
dust28–130.0222%3 Aug
dust213–70.0322%2 Aug
anubis13–110.0419%1 Aug
cache9–13-0.0518%1 Aug
dust211–13-0.0233%1 Aug
dust213–40.0432%1 Aug
inferno10–130.0631%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0517%1 Aug
inferno13–100.0623%30 Jul
dust213–11-0.0323%29 Jul
anubis4–13-0.1012%29 Jul
dust27–130.0237%26 Jul
dust23–13-0.0426%23 Jul
mirage13–100.0120%23 Jul
cache13–50.0129%21 Jul
dust29–130.0337%21 Jul
mirage13–40.0428%20 Jul
dust25–13-0.1018%20 Jul
cache13–50.0216%19 Jul
dust213–6-0.0024%19 Jul
anubis7–00.0932%19 Jul
cache13–50.0839%19 Jul
mirage13–20.0742%19 Jul
dust213–8-0.0126%18 Jul
cache10–130.0117%18 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0125%18 Jul
dust213–70.0437%18 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0717%18 Jul
dust213–80.0225%15 Jul
inferno11–130.0222%15 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0321%15 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0627%15 Jul
mirage13–60.0415%15 Jul
nuke16–140.0221%15 Jul
dust21–13-0.0931%15 Jul
anubis13–10.0730%15 Jul
mirage13–100.0836%15 Jul
cache16–140.0128%15 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0722%15 Jul
dust211–130.0727%14 Jul
cache11–13-0.0013%14 Jul
dust29–13-0.0520%13 Jul
dust28–130.0033%13 Jul
dust213–80.1219%11 Jul
dust213–10-0.0322%11 Jul
dust27–10.0132%11 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0018%10 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0217%9 Jul
cache9–13-0.0720%9 Jul
cache13–60.0540%8 Jul
cache10–2-0.0126%8 Jul
mirage13–50.0533%6 Jul
overpass12–160.0424%3 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0415%3 Jul
dust213–30.0422%3 Jul
dust23–130.0312%30 Jun
anubis8–130.0227%30 Jun
mirage13–80.0226%27 Jun
inferno12–16-0.0324%27 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0116%25 Jun
dust213–11-0.0530%24 Jun
ancient13–70.0222%24 Jun
overpass3–130.0127%24 Jun
mirage13–110.0219%24 Jun
dust213–40.0327%24 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0023%23 Jun
dust215–150.0524%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →