TeMPeR — CS2 Stats

76561198162799855[U:1:202534127]

6,101Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating27,506Top 10% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#592 of 16010 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,831 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTeMPeRFACEITLevel 10 · 2,831 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,506 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning54
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateLLLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression6.7
Utility4.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.4
Utility4.6
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time598ms+39ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy28.1%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 26.8% → last ⅓ avg 28.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 13–4
132Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 77% over 13infernoWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC31131842%0.01
dust2B20101050%-0.00
nukeA149564%0.04
anubisS1310377%0.01
overpassD93633%-0.00
infernoD82625%-0.01
ancient42250%0.03
cache110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,585Matches
53%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
81.7ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage109051%1.2018.2
Dust240350%1.1317.5
Anubis39649%1.1417.7
Ancient34645%1.0816.6
Overpass18056%1.1717.6
Vertigo15255%1.2017.9
Nuke14954%1.1617.2
Inferno14450%1.2017.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.3%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
87.2%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
601msReaction time
36.3%T opening success
46.1%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
8.98HE damage / grenade
6.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.433 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.2828% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–13-0.1336%2 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0743%1 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0035%31 May
nuke13–20.1450%30 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0334%30 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0523%30 Apr
dust29–1-0.0124%30 Apr
nuke13–90.1130%29 Apr
mirage16–140.0738%29 Apr
cache13–50.0734%29 Apr
inferno8–130.0032%29 Apr
nuke13–40.1931%29 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0330%27 Apr
dust23–130.0034%23 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0523%13 Apr
anubis13–70.0621%12 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0511%12 Apr
mirage13–100.0624%11 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0419%11 Apr
dust213–40.1229%11 Apr
overpass13–20.1234%11 Apr
anubis3–130.0341%11 Apr
anubis13–3-0.0411%11 Apr
nuke13–50.0830%11 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0227%10 Apr
overpass13–100.0322%9 Apr
nuke13–110.0521%9 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0021%9 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0028%7 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0326%6 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0529%5 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0221%5 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0117%4 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0224%3 Apr
nuke11–130.0226%3 Apr
mirage13–90.0218%3 Apr
dust214–16-0.0224%3 Apr
anubis13–90.0923%3 Apr
nuke9–130.0124%3 Apr
anubis10–130.0226%3 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0322%3 Apr
ancient13–60.0531%3 Apr
anubis4–130.0325%26 Mar
ancient13–160.0230%25 Mar
dust24–130.0132%21 Mar
mirage13–80.0335%21 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0419%20 Mar
dust211–130.0333%15 Mar
anubis13–60.0116%15 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0340%8 Mar
mirage11–130.1129%8 Mar
nuke13–100.0522%8 Mar
overpass16–130.0819%8 Mar
anubis13–100.0332%8 Mar
ancient13–70.0527%8 Mar
dust213–80.0724%8 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0422%23 Feb
dust213–9-0.0118%17 Feb
mirage13–160.0119%15 Feb
anubis13–5-0.0320%14 Feb
mirage13–110.0543%9 Feb
dust213–100.0830%9 Feb
anubis13–30.0421%5 Feb
dust26–130.0134%5 Feb
mirage13–90.0120%5 Feb
dust211–130.0717%4 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0133%3 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0021%3 Feb
dust213–8-0.0519%2 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0428%31 Jan
nuke4–130.0238%30 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0144%30 Jan
dust25–13-0.0715%30 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0350%29 Jan
mirage12–16-0.0336%29 Jan
mirage13–160.0526%29 Jan
nuke16–140.0431%28 Jan
dust213–8-0.0320%20 Jan
mirage13–20.0628%20 Jan
inferno3–130.0313%15 Jan
nuke13–100.0021%29 Dec
mirage13–40.0230%28 Dec
overpass17–19-0.0314%28 Dec
overpass11–13-0.0316%28 Dec
overpass5–13-0.0523%27 Dec
overpass10–13-0.0631%8 Dec
mirage10–130.0021%7 Dec
inferno16–130.0738%7 Dec
dust213–80.0115%6 Dec
mirage13–160.019%6 Dec
mirage9–13-0.0037%29 Nov
mirage13–8-0.0124%29 Nov
mirage13–11-0.0338%27 Nov
dust29–13-0.0322%23 Nov
dust213–100.0332%18 Nov
mirage8–13-0.0427%18 Nov
mirage13–70.0233%17 Nov
dust213–8-0.0131%17 Nov
mirage11–130.0224%15 Nov
dust23–13-0.0932%14 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →