Fàh Nikh Gerrs — CS2 Stats

JP76561198161771421[U:1:201505693]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

166Tracked matches57%Win rate2024Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning45

Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–38–5Last 10057%Win rateLLLLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1

Aggression7.3

Utility4.3

Positioning4.5

Opening Duels2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning4.5

Utility4.3

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time605ms+20ms

first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms

Headshot accuracy20.7%+3.3%

first ⅓ avg 17.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — anubis 13–1

13–0Biggest win — anubis

7Longest win streak

L4Current streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 10nukeWeakest map · 38% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	24	14–10	58%	0.01
cache	S	15	10–5	67%	0.00
inferno	A	12	7–5	58%	0.02
ancient	A	10	6–4	60%	0.00
dust2	B	10	5–5	50%	0.02
anubis	S	10	7–3	70%	0.03
nuke	C	8	3–5	38%	0.00
overpass	C	5	2–3	40%	0.02
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
train	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy

38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

43.1%Spray accuracy

80.6%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

609msReaction time

35.7%T opening success

45.1%CT opening success

0.40Enemies flashed / flash

3.7%Flash assists

8.28HE damage / grenade

16.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3969 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.716% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	5–13	-0.02	12%	27 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	12%	19 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.01	24%	19 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	23%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.00	22%	17 Jul →
dust2	4–2	-0.01	33%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	20%	17 Jul →
train	13–5	-0.04	16%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	26%	15 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.01	17%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.04	30%	14 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	11%	14 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.06	19%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	18%	12 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.08	24%	12 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.05	25%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–0	0.10	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	19%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.00	15%	9 Jul →
office	13–8	-0.02	29%	9 Jul →
office	10–13	0.06	7%	9 Jul →
boulder	11–13	-0.07	10%	9 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	26%	6 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.10	13%	6 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.10	20%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.03	21%	6 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.13	31%	4 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.03	21%	2 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.02	36%	2 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.18	23%	30 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.01	21%	30 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.04	29%	30 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.00	14%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.07	36%	29 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.01	20%	29 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.04	23%	29 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.03	22%	27 Jun →
overpass	10–13	-0.02	13%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.08	19%	27 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	7%	27 Jun →
ancient	7–13	0.01	10%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–5	-0.03	26%	25 Jun →
cache	13–2	0.01	18%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.08	25%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	15%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–4	0.03	16%	22 Jun →
cache	12–12	-0.02	15%	22 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	10%	22 Jun →
ancient	13–3	-0.02	31%	22 Jun →
anubis	13–1	-0.02	22%	22 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	19%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	13%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.01	21%	20 Jun →
anubis	11–13	0.03	27%	19 Jun →
inferno	6–13	0.05	31%	19 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	24%	17 Jun →
cache	13–10	0.03	20%	16 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.15	33%	16 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.04	17%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.01	35%	15 Jun →
dust2	2–13	0.02	18%	14 Jun →
dust2	12–12	-0.05	21%	13 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.06	8%	12 Jun →
cache	6–13	-0.05	8%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	14%	12 Jun →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	16%	12 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.10	22%	12 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	8%	10 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.01	13%	10 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.14	14%	10 Jun →
inferno	1–13	-0.01	15%	10 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	18%	10 Jun →
vertigo	13–8	-0.01	12%	7 Jun →
vertigo	4–13	0.03	17%	7 Jun →
dust2	8–13	0.04	22%	3 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	8%	2 Jun →
inferno	11–13	0.02	3%	1 Jun →
mirage	13–10	0.10	21%	31 May →
cache	13–9	0.09	16%	30 May →
cache	13–9	-0.06	29%	29 May →
cache	13–9	0.01	16%	29 May →
cache	13–9	-0.00	18%	24 May →
inferno	9–4	0.12	22%	23 May →
inferno	9–4	0.07	27%	23 May →
nuke	4–13	0.00	12%	23 May →
overpass	10–13	-0.01	18%	22 May →
mirage	13–9	0.04	18%	21 May →
anubis	10–13	0.03	16%	18 May →
overpass	9–13	-0.04	12%	18 May →
mirage	13–8	0.06	20%	17 May →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	11%	16 May →
mirage	10–3	-0.02	33%	15 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	21%	15 May →
nuke	9–13	0.02	18%	15 May →
inferno	13–8	0.02	18%	13 May →
mirage	10–13	0.02	20%	13 May →
mirage	12–12	0.06	21%	13 May →
overpass	13–4	0.02	21%	11 May →
mirage	13–2	0.06	22%	10 May →
anubis	13–10	-0.06	12%	8 May →