Cartier — CS2 Stats

76561198160423158[U:1:200157430]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

502Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.3 StrongHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,260Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93

Positioning52

Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59–36–5Last 10059%Win rateWWWWLTWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.3

Aggression4.7

Utility3.4

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch4.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3

Positioning5.2

Utility3.4

Mechanics9.0

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time535ms−64ms

first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms

Headshot accuracy24.8%−4.2%

first ⅓ avg 29.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — cache 9–7

13–3Biggest win — dust2

4Longest win streak

W4Current streak

13–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 14dust2Weakest map · 46% over 28

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	28	13–15	46%	0.02
mirage	B	19	10–9	53%	0.02
nuke	S	14	10–4	71%	0.02
ancient	S	13	9–4	69%	-0.01
cache	A	11	7–4	64%	0.02
inferno	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.01
overpass	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.00
anubis	—	3	3–0	100%	0.03
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 28). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

51Matches

57%Win rate

1.44Avg K/D

98.5ADR

62%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win

12%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	7	43%	1.49	19.0
Cache	6	50%	1.30	16.2
Mirage	6	67%	1.92	20.0
Anubis	5	60%	1.33	20.4
Inferno	5	100%	2.00	18.4
Ancient	5	80%	2.06	23.0
Nuke	3	67%	1.35	21.0
Overpass	1	0%	0.95	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy

41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.5%Spray accuracy

90.7%Counter-strafing

9.1°Preaim

539msReaction time

28.8%T opening success

48.0%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

3.8%Flash assists

1.69HE damage / grenade

7.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.8311% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 28 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–11	0.04	15%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.13	23%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.02	36%	19 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.03	30%	18 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	21%	18 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.04	23%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.03	23%	14 Aug →
dust2	5–0	0.05	13%	14 Aug →
inferno	2–9	-0.12	36%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.03	27%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.11	29%	9 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	27%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.03	28%	3 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	27%	2 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.01	16%	1 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.01	21%	1 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.01	35%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.05	27%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.05	32%	1 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.00	24%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	14%	1 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.03	25%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	17%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.06	26%	1 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.04	25%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.06	20%	22 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	20%	22 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	17%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	16%	19 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	25%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.11	28%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.06	48%	18 Jul →
ancient	16–12	0.08	27%	18 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	22%	18 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	13%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.02	27%	17 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.02	29%	16 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.00	15%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.00	42%	16 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.06	29%	13 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.04	31%	13 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.03	29%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.00	34%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.09	37%	12 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.00	29%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	18%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.08	22%	3 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	29%	3 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	34%	26 Jun →
overpass	13–9	0.04	25%	11 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.01	22%	28 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	21%	17 May →
cache	6–13	0.01	17%	14 May →
cache	7–13	0.07	17%	12 May →
mirage	9–13	0.04	21%	11 May →
mirage	15–19	-0.01	28%	10 May →
cache	13–4	-0.07	21%	9 May →
cache	9–7	0.19	35%	8 May →
mirage	13–5	0.10	24%	7 May →
cache	13–5	0.01	31%	5 May →
mirage	4–13	0.01	28%	2 May →
nuke	13–10	0.01	52%	2 May →
mirage	8–13	0.04	49%	1 May →
mirage	13–4	0.01	31%	30 Apr →
cache	8–13	0.07	31%	29 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	30%	28 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.04	33%	28 Apr →
overpass	8–13	0.00	27%	27 Apr →
overpass	13–6	-0.00	48%	27 Apr →
mirage	16–13	0.06	17%	27 Apr →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	37%	27 Apr →
overpass	13–10	0.03	31%	27 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.01	25%	26 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	21%	26 Apr →
mirage	4–0	0.02	17%	26 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	19%	26 Apr →
anubis	13–7	0.01	30%	26 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.10	27%	26 Apr →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	26%	26 Apr →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	27%	26 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	32%	26 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.04	14%	26 Apr →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	18%	5 Oct →
dust2	10–13	0.01	33%	5 Oct →
vertigo	13–9	0.04	29%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.04	30%	28 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	32%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.06	24%	27 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.03	32%	27 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.07	20%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.09	37%	24 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.09	28%	24 Aug →
overpass	0–9	-0.07	40%	7 Aug →
dust2	10–2	0.03	44%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	14%	3 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	37%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.04	27%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.00	31%	2 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.02	45%	11 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.10	40%	10 Jul →