Exo

Exo — CS2 Stats

DE76561198158666016[U:1:198400288]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

423Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,582Purple band · top ~14.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18387 of 39009 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,334 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGExoFACEITLevel 6 · 1,334 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,582 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning51
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46495Last 10046%Win rateLTLWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5
Aggression7.1
Utility5.9
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch0.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.1
Utility5.9
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time585ms−64ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.31Best rating — debris 9–0
132Biggest win — ancient
7Longest win streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5dust2Weakest map · 36% over 25
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2591636%0.01
infernoB179853%0.01
mirageB158753%0.00
nukeC114736%0.01
ancientC94544%0.02
cacheB63350%0.01
anubisA53260%-0.01
overpassC52340%0.07
poseidon32167%0.03
debris21150%0.11
vertigo21150%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

66Matches
56%Win rate
1.63Avg K/D
99.9ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
43%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage540%1.0713.4
Vertigo475%1.5826.3
Dust2367%1.5826.7
Ancient333%1.8224.7
Anubis367%1.8921.7
Nuke2100%1.6729.5
Overpass2100%1.4220.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
89.6%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
583msReaction time
26.8%T opening success
47.1%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
10.19HE damage / grenade
11.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.7874% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
debris3–9-0.0933%16 Aug
vertigo8–80.0730%16 Aug
nuke2–9-0.090%16 Aug
inferno9–7-0.0038%16 Aug
dust213–80.0425%12 Aug
dust213–4-0.0331%10 Aug
nuke9–70.0228%10 Aug
debris9–00.3121%10 Aug
inferno9–30.1444%10 Aug
cache13–5-0.0126%10 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0217%9 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0313%9 Aug
ancient13–70.0021%9 Aug
cache3–12-0.0224%9 Aug
dust210–130.0614%9 Aug
nuke15–150.0129%8 Aug
dust213–60.0515%8 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0041%8 Aug
cache13–40.1020%20 Jul
dust213–80.0241%18 Jul
nuke13–90.1036%18 Jul
dust211–13-0.0228%18 Jul
inferno5–00.1822%18 Jul
mirage13–80.0513%18 Jul
cache8–130.0325%18 Jul
ancient9–130.0425%15 Jul
dust215–15-0.0227%15 Jul
dust216–13-0.0417%15 Jul
dust29–130.0927%15 Jul
dust28–13-0.0223%15 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0517%14 Jul
dust24–13-0.0221%14 Jul
cache13–8-0.0321%14 Jul
anubis13–100.0326%10 Jul
cache9–13-0.0133%10 Jul
inferno13–100.0028%9 Jul
mirage8–130.0232%9 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0237%9 Jul
dust211–130.0313%7 Apr
anubis16–130.0412%5 Apr
overpass13–40.1829%5 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0510%5 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0313%4 Apr
inferno9–40.1630%4 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0017%4 Apr
poseidon9–50.0620%4 Apr
dust210–130.0130%2 Apr
nuke3–130.0319%2 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0117%2 Apr
dust22–130.0527%1 Apr
ancient13–20.0315%31 Mar
dust213–9-0.0324%31 Mar
dust26–13-0.0525%30 Mar
ancient6–130.0725%30 Mar
dust213–100.0427%30 Mar
poseidon6–9-0.0919%30 Mar
vertigo9–30.1519%30 Mar
inferno6–9-0.0429%30 Mar
inferno9–10.2233%30 Mar
nuke8–80.0015%30 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0419%30 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0030%29 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0029%29 Mar
nuke10–130.0219%29 Mar
inferno9–00.0825%29 Mar
dust213–40.0745%24 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0125%24 Mar
dust210–130.0114%24 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0022%24 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0520%23 Mar
anubis2–13-0.0328%23 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0324%22 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0510%22 Mar
dust28–13-0.0921%22 Mar
mirage16–120.1123%20 Mar
mirage10–130.0333%20 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0112%19 Mar
inferno10–130.0316%19 Mar
dust211–13-0.0119%19 Mar
dust26–130.0220%18 Mar
overpass8–130.0724%18 Mar
inferno13–90.0615%18 Mar
mirage4–13-0.0525%18 Mar
dust29–13-0.0517%18 Mar
ancient13–110.0023%18 Mar
dust27–13-0.0322%16 Mar
overpass9–30.1421%16 Mar
dust213–50.1114%14 Mar
nuke13–100.0015%13 Mar
inferno7–90.0119%12 Mar
nuke9–60.0826%12 Mar
inferno0–9-0.2220%12 Mar
inferno4–9-0.1518%12 Mar
inferno7–9-0.1711%11 Mar
inferno6–90.0730%11 Mar
mirage13–40.0628%9 Mar
ancient13–60.0514%9 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0631%9 Mar
inferno3–9-0.2033%7 Mar
poseidon9–50.1347%7 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →