SeRoXuM — CS2 Stats

76561198157681028[U:1:197415300]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

637Tracked matches75%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,932Pink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning56

Utility18

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT69–27–4Last 10069%Win rateTWWWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1

Aggression7.6

Utility1.8

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels4.1

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 647ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.6

Utility1.8

Mechanics9.4

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time650ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 688ms → last ⅓ avg 650ms

Headshot accuracy16.9%−2.1%

first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 13–4

13–0Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

8–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 18dust2Weakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	27	19–8	70%	0.03
ancient	S	18	15–3	83%	0.05
nuke	S	17	11–6	65%	0.03
cache	S	12	10–2	83%	0.04
dust2	D	7	2–5	29%	0.01
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	0.05
vertigo	A	5	3–2	60%	0.03
overpass	—	4	4–0	100%	0.05
inferno	—	3	2–1	67%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy

39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.1%Spray accuracy

92.2%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

647msReaction time

37.6%T opening success

55.0%CT opening success

0.28Enemies flashed / flash

0.0%Flash assists

8.57HE damage / grenade

1.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2825 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.5589% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	12–12	0.00	15%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.04	17%	10 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.03	19%	9 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.10	16%	4 Jul →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	17%	3 Jul →
ancient	16–13	0.03	11%	2 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	7%	1 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.00	20%	1 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.09	16%	29 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.01	26%	27 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	23%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.11	19%	26 Jun →
nuke	5–13	0.03	17%	26 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.00	19%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–4	-0.04	6%	25 Jun →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	8%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.07	17%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–6	-0.03	17%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	8%	23 Jun →
nuke	13–9	0.02	25%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.04	7%	21 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.08	27%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.07	20%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–2	0.11	34%	21 Jun →
vertigo	13–2	-0.02	15%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–0	0.10	10%	20 Jun →
dust2	15–15	0.04	13%	20 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	16%	20 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.00	21%	20 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	21%	20 Jun →
mirage	4–13	0.02	17%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.04	9%	19 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	0.04	22%	19 Jun →
cache	13–6	0.06	17%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.00	17%	18 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.03	10%	18 Jun →
cache	13–4	0.04	27%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.07	9%	18 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.03	24%	18 Jun →
anubis	2–13	0.01	22%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–1	0.04	17%	17 Jun →
anubis	9–13	0.07	10%	17 Jun →
ancient	16–13	0.02	13%	17 Jun →
nuke	3–13	-0.06	32%	16 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.02	21%	16 Jun →
vertigo	12–12	-0.01	13%	15 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.07	24%	15 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.01	8%	15 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.11	27%	15 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.16	23%	15 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.00	22%	14 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.05	13%	13 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.03	21%	13 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	29%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.09	18%	13 Jun →
overpass	13–8	0.12	13%	13 Jun →
cache	13–5	0.15	29%	13 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	20%	13 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.06	13%	12 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.14	9%	12 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	23%	12 Jun →
nuke	14–16	-0.02	18%	11 Jun →
vertigo	2–10	0.03	18%	11 Jun →
cache	13–9	0.08	22%	11 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.15	14%	11 Jun →
overpass	13–0	0.01	0%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.11	29%	11 Jun →
anubis	5–13	0.02	16%	11 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.01	19%	11 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.05	28%	11 Jun →
mirage	11–3	0.02	31%	11 Jun →
overpass	13–11	-0.01	32%	11 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	20%	11 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.03	17%	10 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.04	31%	10 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.04	20%	9 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.15	20%	9 Jun →
mirage	3–13	0.02	23%	9 Jun →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	22%	9 Jun →
vertigo	13–4	0.09	15%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.01	18%	8 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.02	19%	8 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.08	16%	7 Jun →
ancient	9–13	0.02	19%	7 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.01	9%	7 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.03	15%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	22%	6 Jun →
cache	9–13	0.02	17%	5 Jun →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	17%	5 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.04	21%	5 Jun →
mirage	16–13	0.10	20%	4 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.02	20%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.10	15%	4 Jun →
anubis	9–8	0.08	12%	4 Jun →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	11%	4 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.17	20%	3 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.06	19%	3 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.19	23%	3 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.07	11%	3 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.02	12%	2 Jun →