Peebutt — CS2 Stats

76561198152546564[U:1:192280836]

497Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning47
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48466Last 10048%Win rateWLWWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.0
Aggression7.9
Utility5.0
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch0.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 664ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning4.7
Utility5.0
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time662ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 705ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy16.3%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 13.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — nuke 13–11
133Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
514In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26121446%-0.01
dust2B24131154%-0.01
nukeA1911858%-0.00
ancientC114736%-0.03
infernoD92722%-0.02
overpassA53260%-0.01
anubisC52340%-0.02
cache110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

55Matches
55%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
106.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21100%1.3811.0
Mirage1100%2.2022.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
90.6%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
664msReaction time
31.6%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
9.7%Flash assists
10.99HE damage / grenade
4.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4894 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.6188% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–9-0.0319%19 Aug
mirage11–130.0529%19 Aug
dust213–60.0227%4 Jun
cache13–60.0714%3 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0517%3 Jun
nuke13–110.0918%2 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0212%10 Mar
anubis6–13-0.0320%9 Mar
dust213–16-0.0319%7 Mar
ancient9–13-0.055%6 Mar
dust213–10-0.0917%5 Mar
inferno13–70.0114%5 Mar
overpass13–60.019%5 Mar
mirage13–100.0512%4 Mar
mirage4–130.0015%3 Mar
dust215–150.0127%3 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0014%2 Mar
dust213–30.037%2 Mar
mirage6–13-0.058%1 Mar
ancient8–13-0.053%1 Mar
mirage11–130.079%28 Feb
dust28–13-0.0413%28 Feb
dust216–13-0.0216%27 Feb
inferno11–130.0123%27 Feb
mirage12–4-0.0030%27 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0311%27 Feb
dust213–10-0.0122%26 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0217%26 Feb
dust213–9-0.0129%26 Feb
dust211–13-0.0115%25 Feb
mirage10–130.0024%24 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0111%24 Feb
mirage16–120.0713%20 Feb
dust213–80.0120%20 Feb
dust24–130.0319%20 Feb
ancient11–130.0219%20 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0613%20 Feb
inferno4–13-0.0512%19 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0821%19 Feb
mirage13–50.0116%19 Feb
dust213–110.0619%19 Feb
nuke11–13-0.0423%19 Feb
mirage10–13-0.077%17 Feb
dust213–40.0138%17 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0726%17 Feb
mirage4–13-0.097%14 Feb
dust210–13-0.0420%13 Feb
nuke13–100.0121%13 Feb
mirage8–130.0023%12 Feb
anubis2–13-0.053%7 Feb
overpass13–70.0011%5 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0618%4 Feb
ancient16–13-0.0323%3 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0421%3 Feb
dust27–13-0.0723%3 Feb
inferno6–110.0415%3 Feb
nuke6–130.0412%3 Feb
anubis7–130.0125%3 Feb
nuke14–16-0.0310%3 Feb
inferno11–13-0.009%3 Feb
dust22–13-0.0330%3 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0432%3 Feb
nuke13–10-0.005%2 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0518%2 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0311%2 Feb
mirage13–110.0019%1 Feb
nuke13–100.028%1 Feb
dust213–10-0.0719%1 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0618%28 Jan
inferno15–15-0.0325%27 Jan
ancient15–150.0215%27 Jan
anubis13–70.0514%27 Jan
dust213–8-0.0125%27 Jan
nuke2–7-0.070%16 Jan
dust28–13-0.098%16 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0417%16 Jan
mirage1–7-0.040%16 Jan
mirage8–130.0111%15 Jan
dust28–130.0011%15 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0315%14 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0113%14 Jan
mirage15–15-0.077%14 Jan
nuke15–15-0.0216%14 Jan
nuke13–4-0.017%14 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0611%13 Jan
overpass13–8-0.0011%13 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0114%13 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0812%11 Jan
nuke13–70.0411%11 Jan
mirage13–60.0719%11 Jan
nuke13–80.0412%11 Jan
nuke13–100.0111%11 Jan
ancient5–13-0.0613%11 Jan
mirage16–130.0217%10 Jan
nuke13–5-0.047%10 Jan
nuke13–9-0.0312%10 Jan
dust213–100.0524%9 Jan
nuke11–130.0312%9 Jan
mirage13–60.057%9 Jan
dust215–150.0317%9 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →