Bundaberg — CS2 Stats

76561198146126883[U:1:185861155]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,883Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.0 Developing

Premier CS Rating21,519Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10183 of 31752 tracked

FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56

Positioning54

Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–51–7Last 10042%Win rateLWLWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6

Aggression7.0

Utility5.4

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 688ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6

Positioning5.4

Utility5.4

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time690ms−71ms

first ⅓ avg 761ms → last ⅓ avg 690ms

Headshot accuracy13.1%−1.6%

first ⅓ avg 14.7% → last ⅓ avg 13.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — cache 13–10

13–4Biggest win — nuke

7Longest win streak

13–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 56% over 18dust2Weakest map · 24% over 21

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	24	13–11	54%	-0.01
dust2	D	21	5–16	24%	0.01
mirage	A	18	10–8	56%	-0.01
nuke	C	13	5–8	38%	0.02
anubis	C	8	3–5	38%	0.01
ancient	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.02
inferno	—	4	1–3	25%	0.02
overpass	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	0.10
alpine	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

23Matches

57%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

91.6ADR

30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Vertigo	1	100%	1.05	21.0
Anubis	1	0%	1.00	16.0
Ancient	1	100%	1.18	13.0
Inferno	1	100%	3.20	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.6%Headshot accuracy

37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.5%Spray accuracy

82.0%Counter-strafing

11.2°Preaim

688msReaction time

31.5%T opening success

49.0%CT opening success

0.55Enemies flashed / flash

16.6%Flash assists

10.09HE damage / grenade

4.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.5574% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.5047% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	1–13	-0.01	19%	28 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.02	13%	28 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	18%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.00	13%	22 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.06	12%	22 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.04	8%	22 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.07	21%	22 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.02	12%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	7%	16 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.02	8%	15 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.01	10%	9 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.01	6%	9 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	23%	9 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	16%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.02	15%	9 Aug →
shelter	13–11	0.10	12%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.08	9%	9 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.12	9%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	9%	8 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	13%	8 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.00	7%	8 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	9%	7 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	13%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	16%	7 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	23%	6 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	18%	5 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	13%	5 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.08	6%	4 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.03	11%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	14%	3 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.00	14%	3 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.01	23%	2 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.06	14%	2 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.00	21%	1 Aug →
cache	16–14	0.05	11%	29 Jul →
ancient	2–13	0.03	16%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	12%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.07	18%	26 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.00	14%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.07	12%	24 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.07	9%	24 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.02	7%	24 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.05	19%	24 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.07	20%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.03	12%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	10%	19 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	12%	19 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	5%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.01	24%	19 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	21%	18 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.01	17%	18 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.00	31%	18 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.06	16%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.00	16%	15 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.08	19%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.11	10%	14 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	13%	14 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.02	17%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.04	13%	13 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	15%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	10%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.10	15%	25 May →
alpine	10–13	-0.00	15%	25 May →
vertigo	12–12	0.01	13%	25 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	6%	25 May →
cache	6–13	-0.04	18%	25 May →
cache	8–13	0.01	8%	24 May →
cache	13–7	-0.07	17%	22 May →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	12%	22 May →
overpass	13–8	0.07	13%	22 May →
cache	12–12	-0.07	11%	21 May →
overpass	16–14	0.03	17%	17 May →
nuke	5–13	0.02	19%	17 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	11%	17 May →
cache	9–13	-0.10	6%	16 May →
cache	12–12	-0.06	13%	15 May →
cache	13–6	0.03	6%	13 May →
cache	5–13	-0.07	8%	9 May →
nuke	2–13	-0.02	15%	9 May →
dust2	11–13	0.08	12%	9 May →
dust2	11–13	0.03	18%	9 May →
inferno	6–13	0.02	18%	9 May →
cache	13–10	0.14	16%	7 May →
cache	13–8	0.01	23%	7 May →
overpass	6–13	-0.09	13%	4 May →
cache	12–12	0.00	8%	3 May →
cache	13–11	0.02	17%	3 May →
nuke	13–8	0.07	8%	13 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.02	19%	12 Apr →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	11%	12 Apr →
overpass	10–13	-0.05	14%	11 Apr →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	16%	11 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.08	17%	11 Apr →
anubis	15–15	0.09	14%	5 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	15%	5 Apr →
inferno	14–16	0.04	15%	5 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.06	10%	4 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.04	22%	4 Apr →
dust2	9–13	0.00	21%	4 Apr →
mirage	5–13	0.04	31%	4 Apr →