Zephfori — CS2 Stats

NZ76561198143777872[U:1:183512144]Steam profile ↗

411Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64

Positioning50

Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateLLWWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4

Aggression6.2

Utility3.5

Positioning5.0

Opening Duels1.8

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4

Positioning5.0

Utility3.5

Mechanics5.0

Opening Duels2.2

Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time615ms−86ms

first ⅓ avg 702ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms

Headshot accuracy18.7%+0.8%

first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — mirage 13–8

13–0Biggest win — vertigo

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

3–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 52% over 25trainWeakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	25	13–12	52%	-0.01
mirage	B	21	11–10	52%	0.00
cache	C	16	7–9	44%	0.02
ancient	D	8	2–6	25%	-0.03
train	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.05
inferno	D	6	2–4	33%	0.02
anubis	—	4	0–4	0%	0.00
overpass	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.00
vertigo	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.00
nuke	—	3	2–1	67%	0.07
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

13Matches

54%Win rate

1.11Avg K/D

88.8ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	5	80%	1.29	18.6
Dust2	3	33%	1.45	17.0
Ancient	3	33%	0.67	12.0
Inferno	1	100%	1.25	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy

32.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.4%Spray accuracy

72.6%Counter-strafing

8.0°Preaim

601msReaction time

27.5%T opening success

47.2%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

5.8%Flash assists

8.22HE damage / grenade

3.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.9395 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.4504% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Train

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Train callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	11–13	-0.03	15%	24 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	14%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.05	13%	9 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	18%	29 May →
cache	13–9	0.10	15%	29 May →
inferno	4–13	0.19	29%	28 May →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	30%	28 May →
cache	8–13	0.07	22%	23 May →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	24%	23 May →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	14%	22 May →
cache	8–13	-0.01	26%	22 May →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	19%	22 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	15%	22 May →
ancient	8–13	-0.08	17%	21 May →
dust2	13–10	0.01	19%	21 May →
overpass	13–7	-0.01	26%	21 May →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	17%	21 May →
dust2	3–13	-0.10	6%	18 May →
warden	13–11	-0.03	19%	18 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	19%	16 May →
dust2	13–16	-0.03	24%	15 May →
cache	11–13	0.06	16%	15 May →
nuke	13–2	0.13	20%	15 May →
ancient	13–3	-0.01	14%	15 May →
mirage	13–6	0.02	29%	14 May →
cache	8–13	-0.03	24%	14 May →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	10%	11 May →
vertigo	8–13	-0.02	0%	11 May →
cache	13–11	0.03	15%	11 May →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	24%	11 May →
cache	6–13	0.04	32%	9 May →
cache	12–12	-0.04	23%	9 May →
cache	8–13	-0.04	11%	9 May →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	13%	9 May →
cache	13–2	0.04	25%	7 May →
cache	13–6	0.05	20%	7 May →
cache	13–2	0.01	13%	6 May →
cache	13–9	-0.07	8%	1 May →
cache	5–13	0.05	14%	1 May →
cache	9–13	-0.00	19%	1 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.03	19%	30 Apr →
dust2	13–3	0.05	26%	30 Apr →
cache	13–10	0.02	15%	30 Apr →
inferno	13–6	-0.04	19%	26 Apr →
mirage	13–3	-0.02	13%	26 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	23%	26 Apr →
anubis	11–13	0.06	11%	22 Apr →
train	12–12	0.02	14%	22 Apr →
train	13–7	0.02	18%	22 Apr →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	19%	4 Apr →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	6%	4 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	21%	2 Apr →
overpass	13–11	0.01	17%	2 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.04	21%	28 Mar →
mirage	10–0	0.16	9%	28 Mar →
inferno	5–13	0.06	35%	19 Mar →
office	2–13	-0.06	20%	18 Mar →
mirage	13–9	-0.07	16%	18 Mar →
mirage	13–7	0.03	16%	18 Mar →
dust2	13–9	0.01	14%	13 Mar →
mirage	13–7	0.02	6%	1 Jan →
vertigo	13–9	-0.02	10%	12 Sept →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	14%	12 Sept →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	7%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	25%	4 Apr →
train	8–13	-0.06	12%	8 Feb →
train	3–13	-0.13	30%	8 Feb →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	17%	6 Feb →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	17%	2 Feb →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	14%	29 Jan →
dust2	6–13	0.06	13%	29 Jan →
vertigo	13–0	0.05	37%	25 Jan →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	31%	25 Jan →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	27%	24 Jan →
mirage	13–8	0.01	15%	24 Jan →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	9%	22 Jan →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	19%	22 Jan →
overpass	9–13	-0.01	31%	22 Jan →
overpass	9–13	-0.00	18%	22 Jan →
nuke	13–6	-0.03	11%	21 Jan →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	19%	21 Jan →
mirage	13–5	0.05	17%	15 Jan →
train	3–13	-0.05	33%	15 Jan →
nuke	4–13	0.10	16%	15 Jan →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	21%	15 Jan →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	22%	15 Jan →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	12%	14 Jan →
mirage	8–13	0.00	12%	13 Jan →
train	6–13	-0.10	10%	13 Jan →
train	3–13	-0.06	14%	11 Jan →
mirage	7–13	0.02	11%	11 Jan →
mirage	13–8	0.20	27%	11 Jan →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	19%	11 Jan →
ancient	10–13	0.04	26%	11 Jan →
dust2	13–2	0.04	15%	9 Jan →
vertigo	6–13	-0.02	13%	9 Jan →
dust2	13–7	0.06	14%	9 Jan →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	11%	8 Jan →
mirage	0–13	-0.10	0%	8 Jan →
dust2	13–5	0.09	22%	7 Jan →