Jmuccera

Jmuccera — CS2 Stats

76561198142705132[U:1:182439404]Steam profile ↗

902Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,590Pink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13268 of 36398 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJmucceraFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,590 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning48
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53434Last 10053%Win rateLWWLLWWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.1
Aggression4.8
Utility5.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time565ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 5–0
132Biggest win — ancient
7Longest win streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 58% over 36nukeWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A36211558%-0.00
infernoA23131057%0.01
mirageB168850%0.00
ancientC167944%-0.01
nukeC73443%0.02
anubis110100%0.02
overpass1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

54Matches
63%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
85.0ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1362%1.1816.1
Ancient1155%1.1016.1
Inferno1060%1.3718.8
Anubis967%1.2017.4
Dust2683%1.2215.0
Cache1100%0.439.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
559msReaction time
27.5%T opening success
50.5%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
18.1%Flash assists
7.24HE damage / grenade
3.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.8793 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.5075% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–9-0.0124%29 Aug
mirage13–9-0.004%16 Aug
inferno13–11-0.019%14 Aug
dust25–5-0.0515%14 Aug
dust25–13-0.076%14 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0112%14 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0513%14 Aug
inferno13–8-0.038%12 Aug
ancient15–150.008%12 Aug
inferno13–100.0228%12 Aug
dust213–70.0114%20 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0211%20 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0233%20 Jul
ancient14–160.0212%17 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0416%17 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0115%17 Jul
dust213–11-0.0129%17 Jul
mirage13–16-0.009%29 Jun
dust22–12-0.0611%29 Jun
dust213–60.0617%28 Jun
dust213–110.0326%28 Jun
nuke11–130.0214%28 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0014%28 Jun
dust213–9-0.024%7 Jun
dust210–13-0.0225%7 Jun
ancient13–8-0.036%6 Jun
dust211–13-0.0320%31 May
ancient13–40.0430%31 May
nuke9–130.1021%24 May
inferno13–60.0527%15 May
mirage13–70.0314%15 May
ancient4–13-0.0227%26 Mar
dust213–8-0.0019%13 Mar
dust29–13-0.0213%13 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0025%13 Mar
dust213–110.0611%11 Mar
ancient13–80.0120%9 Mar
mirage15–150.0523%7 Mar
ancient13–16-0.0718%28 Feb
dust212–16-0.0011%28 Feb
ancient15–15-0.0024%28 Feb
dust28–13-0.0817%26 Feb
ancient9–13-0.034%26 Feb
dust26–13-0.0617%24 Feb
dust213–70.0516%21 Feb
inferno11–130.0317%21 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0213%21 Feb
inferno13–4-0.0124%9 Feb
anubis13–50.028%24 Jan
dust210–13-0.0314%24 Jan
dust23–13-0.0520%24 Jan
dust213–110.1319%18 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0612%18 Jan
inferno12–16-0.0516%17 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0531%17 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0218%17 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0318%17 Jan
inferno9–13-0.0315%15 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0121%15 Jan
dust213–70.0419%14 Jan
dust23–13-0.1113%14 Jan
mirage12–120.0023%14 Jan
nuke12–16-0.0018%11 Jan
dust213–60.0234%10 Jan
inferno9–130.0324%10 Jan
overpass4–13-0.0621%10 Jan
ancient8–130.0222%10 Jan
dust213–60.0013%9 Jan
dust28–13-0.0216%7 Jan
inferno13–3-0.010%3 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0124%3 Jan
mirage9–130.019%3 Jan
dust213–80.1113%3 Jan
dust26–13-0.0515%3 Jan
mirage13–80.0413%2 Jan
inferno13–40.0517%2 Jan
dust213–110.0619%2 Jan
inferno5–00.1626%25 Dec
nuke13–6-0.0113%25 Dec
dust213–4-0.0031%20 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0323%20 Dec
dust213–110.0118%20 Dec
inferno2–70.0113%18 Dec
dust213–10-0.0110%17 Dec
nuke13–40.0127%17 Dec
mirage16–130.0416%16 Dec
inferno13–6-0.0219%8 Dec
nuke8–130.0619%8 Dec
dust213–10-0.0222%4 Dec
inferno13–9-0.0321%30 Nov
ancient13–6-0.0213%30 Nov
ancient13–80.0925%30 Nov
inferno13–60.0436%30 Nov
dust213–4-0.0324%28 Nov
dust213–40.0913%28 Nov
dust27–13-0.0615%22 Nov
inferno16–13-0.0112%20 Nov
dust216–14-0.0024%18 Nov
inferno13–30.1328%18 Nov
mirage13–30.0422%18 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →