Tor — CS2 Stats

76561198141265298[U:1:180999570]

600Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,470 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTorFACEITLevel 9 · 1,470 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning57
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT5446Last 10054%Win rateWWWLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression6.3
Utility5.7
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.7
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time607ms+28ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–4
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
1111In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 73% over 15infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA34191556%0.02
anubisB168850%0.02
cacheS1511473%0.03
infernoD124833%-0.01
ancientB84450%0.04
vertigoS75271%-0.00
dust2D62433%0.01
nuke21150%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

192Matches
62%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
89.4ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2286%1.7423.3
Ancient1354%1.2015.4
Dust21377%1.3317.7
Inferno933%1.1417.7
Anubis967%1.0120.0
Nuke875%1.3115.8
Cache580%1.1318.2
Overpass450%1.3120.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
618msReaction time
34.0%T opening success
50.7%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
12.47HE damage / grenade
8.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.0061% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0523%21 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0136%21 Aug
ancient13–10.1112%17 Aug
cache7–130.0121%15 Aug
ancient13–50.0314%15 Aug
anubis13–60.0318%1 Aug
mirage13–90.0226%26 Jul
anubis15–190.0414%26 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0115%26 Jul
inferno13–70.0321%24 Jul
cache13–11-0.0322%24 Jul
vertigo13–11-0.0532%24 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0526%24 Jul
inferno5–13-0.1114%23 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0521%23 Jul
cache13–50.0634%23 Jul
anubis19–160.0218%23 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0117%23 Jul
dust25–13-0.0625%22 Jul
cache13–30.0541%22 Jul
anubis7–130.1217%22 Jul
inferno13–40.1026%22 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0217%22 Jul
mirage13–100.0419%22 Jul
ancient13–70.0718%22 Jul
anubis8–130.0460%20 Jul
mirage11–13-0.017%20 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0315%20 Jul
mirage14–160.0224%20 Jul
cache13–60.0723%19 Jul
dust213–11-0.0130%19 Jul
cache13–40.0712%18 Jul
cache13–100.0228%18 Jul
inferno13–5-0.0321%18 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0330%18 Jul
dust26–130.0515%18 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0120%18 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0325%18 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0912%18 Jul
cache13–5-0.0024%17 Jul
inferno1–130.0537%17 Jul
anubis13–100.0723%17 Jul
ancient4–130.0133%17 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0236%17 Jul
anubis13–70.0516%16 Jul
ancient13–80.0524%16 Jul
cache13–7-0.029%16 Jul
vertigo13–60.0122%16 Jul
vertigo11–13-0.0220%16 Jul
mirage13–160.0223%15 Jul
inferno13–70.1020%15 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0319%15 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0616%15 Jul
mirage13–100.0119%14 Jul
inferno5–13-0.1020%14 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0020%13 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0316%13 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0727%13 Jul
vertigo16–140.0228%5 Jul
vertigo13–110.0213%5 Jul
cache13–90.0314%5 Jul
ancient11–130.0518%5 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0117%4 Jul
anubis10–130.0416%4 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0217%4 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0411%4 Jul
mirage14–160.0116%4 Jul
mirage13–60.0316%4 Jul
dust213–80.0321%4 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0511%4 Jul
mirage5–10-0.0029%3 Jul
cache11–13-0.0420%2 Jul
mirage13–30.0414%2 Jul
mirage13–50.1119%2 Jul
mirage13–110.0225%2 Jul
mirage13–70.0916%1 Jul
mirage13–30.0922%1 Jul
mirage12–10.1420%1 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0521%30 Jun
mirage13–60.1124%30 Jun
inferno6–130.0119%30 Jun
anubis4–130.0125%30 Jun
vertigo13–100.0631%29 Jun
ancient2–130.0726%29 Jun
mirage16–130.1019%28 Jun
cache8–130.0313%28 Jun
cache13–80.0916%28 Jun
mirage13–30.0624%28 Jun
dust27–13-0.0115%28 Jun
anubis19–170.0218%27 Jun
mirage11–130.0516%27 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0328%27 Jun
anubis13–70.0725%27 Jun
dust28–130.0424%27 Jun
cache8–130.0120%26 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0820%26 Jun
cache13–40.1625%26 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0119%26 Jun
vertigo10–13-0.0711%26 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0318%26 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →