altosk — CS2 Stats

76561198140334704[U:1:180068976]

927Tracked matches36%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.5 Learning
FaceitLevel 4 · 915 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaltoskFACEITLevel 4 · 915 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim37
Positioning46
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48475Last 10048%Win rateLTWLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.7
Aggression6.8
Utility3.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 651ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.7
Positioning4.6
Utility3.2
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact0.2

Composite 3.5/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time656ms+45ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 656ms
Headshot accuracy19.8%+5.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — inferno 13–0
130Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2181338%-0.02
mirageS2014670%-0.01
overpassA148657%-0.00
ancientD102820%-0.02
infernoD72529%-0.01
dust2S65183%-0.01
anubisD61517%-0.02
vertigoA53260%0.00
cache42250%-0.01
train32167%-0.01
office1010%-0.03
stronghold110100%0.01
warden1010%-0.10
alpine1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
39%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
77.8ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno425%0.9213.5
Train367%1.0013.0
Nuke250%0.8810.0
Dust2250%1.3211.5
Mirage250%0.9414.5
Overpass1100%1.9019.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
26.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.2%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
12.6°Preaim
651msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
51.7%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
8.41HE damage / grenade
3.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.5717° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3534 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–13-0.0821%7 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0223%7 Aug
nuke2–10.0050%7 Aug
dust25–13-0.0517%7 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0041%7 Aug
dust216–14-0.0321%17 Jul
anubis1–130.0238%11 Jul
mirage4–13-0.048%11 Jul
office4–13-0.0315%11 Jul
cache11–13-0.114%12 Jun
cache13–70.0425%11 Jun
vertigo5–13-0.0414%5 Jun
cache5–130.0117%5 Jun
cache13–10-0.0016%29 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0620%24 Apr
nuke13–90.0822%23 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0224%15 Mar
inferno12–16-0.0219%15 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0419%19 Feb
overpass6–130.0212%19 Feb
nuke13–11-0.0630%14 Feb
overpass13–7-0.0013%14 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0618%14 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0220%14 Feb
mirage10–13-0.019%14 Feb
nuke12–120.0217%12 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0214%12 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0322%1 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0220%1 Feb
anubis2–13-0.0512%1 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0420%26 Jan
mirage13–5-0.0418%26 Jan
ancient13–6-0.0215%25 Jan
overpass8–13-0.0417%25 Jan
ancient12–12-0.0216%25 Jan
nuke13–16-0.0718%23 Jan
overpass10–13-0.0912%23 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0521%22 Jan
dust213–40.0419%22 Jan
anubis13–60.048%22 Jan
stronghold3–00.010%22 Jan
mirage13–110.0810%22 Jan
nuke13–3-0.0119%22 Jan
anubis8–13-0.0611%22 Jan
warden7–13-0.1013%22 Jan
alpine11–13-0.0112%21 Jan
ancient8–13-0.026%21 Jan
anubis7–13-0.0510%21 Jan
overpass13–10-0.0016%19 Jan
ancient8–13-0.0411%18 Jan
nuke13–3-0.0210%18 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0711%18 Jan
mirage13–7-0.0214%18 Jan
ancient10–130.0214%17 Jan
overpass13–10.0424%17 Jan
inferno13–00.1021%17 Jan
mirage13–70.0215%13 Jan
vertigo13–11-0.0116%13 Jan
nuke13–30.0615%13 Jan
train13–90.0113%10 Jan
overpass13–60.0416%10 Jan
nuke14–16-0.0424%7 Jan
vertigo13–80.0318%7 Jan
train12–12-0.0427%7 Jan
dust213–110.075%6 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0511%6 Jan
train13–3-0.0021%6 Jan
ancient11–13-0.049%5 Jan
nuke13–11-0.0225%5 Jan
overpass13–8-0.0414%5 Jan
inferno6–13-0.069%2 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0710%2 Jan
nuke5–13-0.0121%31 Dec
overpass4–13-0.0410%31 Dec
dust213–11-0.069%31 Dec
mirage13–40.0319%30 Dec
overpass13–100.0320%30 Dec
dust213–10-0.0116%29 Dec
overpass10–130.0419%29 Dec
mirage13–7-0.0413%26 Dec
nuke4–13-0.0513%24 Dec
mirage13–80.0625%24 Dec
mirage13–80.0214%21 Dec
nuke9–130.0115%21 Dec
ancient1–13-0.0515%20 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0218%20 Dec
overpass13–60.0211%19 Dec
mirage16–14-0.0412%19 Dec
nuke10–13-0.0215%19 Dec
anubis12–12-0.0115%17 Dec
vertigo8–130.0314%17 Dec
vertigo13–50.0224%17 Dec
mirage6–13-0.0714%17 Dec
overpass10–130.0015%15 Dec
ancient13–100.017%15 Dec
mirage13–30.097%15 Dec
nuke6–13-0.0314%14 Dec
overpass13–90.0114%14 Dec
nuke10–130.0014%14 Dec
mirage16–140.018%14 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →