sebs

sebs — CS2 Stats

BR76561198139994430[U:1:179728702]Steam profile ↗

1,249Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Premier CS Rating17,362Purple band · top ~19% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6813 of 11820 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 993 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsebsFACEITLevel 4 · 993 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER17,362 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim41
Positioning50
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47494Last 10047%Win rateLWLLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim4.1
Aggression7.1
Utility5.7
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch9.4

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 640ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.1
Positioning5.0
Utility5.7
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time649ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–5
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 55% over 20anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24131154%0.01
nukeA2011955%0.01
infernoB2091145%0.01
ancientC1661038%-0.00
overpassB84450%-0.02
anubisD62433%-0.01
cache32167%0.01
dust23030%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

86Matches
48%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
90.3ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

67%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage250%1.7419.0
Dust2250%1.4913.0
Overpass1100%2.8620.0
Nuke10%0.8822.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.2%Spray accuracy
70.3%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
640msReaction time
27.7%T opening success
49.7%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
11.81HE damage / grenade
6.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.0084° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.0519%28 Aug
ancient13–4-0.079%23 Aug
mirage11–130.0011%23 Aug
mirage11–130.0213%23 Aug
nuke10–130.0318%22 Aug
ancient13–50.0416%19 Aug
mirage11–130.0323%18 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0528%17 Aug
anubis13–6-0.039%17 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0425%17 Aug
ancient13–70.0515%15 Aug
cache3–13-0.0414%15 Aug
inferno13–30.0117%10 Aug
ancient13–100.0720%9 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0315%9 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0615%7 Aug
inferno6–2-0.0413%7 Aug
nuke13–90.0923%6 Aug
dust28–13-0.1115%6 Aug
dust210–13-0.0621%5 Aug
mirage9–130.0316%4 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0513%2 Aug
nuke13–110.0716%1 Aug
inferno13–50.0621%1 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0021%1 Aug
ancient11–130.0126%31 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0318%31 Jul
inferno13–80.0724%30 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0529%24 Jul
inferno16–130.0323%23 Jul
cache13–70.0421%22 Jul
mirage5–130.0716%20 Jul
inferno1–130.017%20 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0418%18 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0321%18 Jul
anubis9–130.009%16 Jul
mirage13–110.0728%15 Jul
inferno15–150.0532%14 Jul
mirage16–130.0116%13 Jul
cache13–90.0416%8 Jul
nuke19–150.0615%8 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0119%8 Jul
nuke13–50.048%6 Jul
inferno13–100.0842%5 Jul
mirage15–150.0619%4 Jul
mirage13–40.0312%4 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0436%3 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0410%3 Jul
inferno11–130.0420%1 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0217%30 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0117%29 Jun
mirage6–1-0.0130%29 Jun
dust29–13-0.0114%28 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0317%28 Jun
inferno13–50.1231%28 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0612%28 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0418%28 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0523%27 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0720%27 Jun
nuke13–80.0128%27 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0315%27 Jun
nuke13–100.0117%22 Jun
inferno11–130.0325%18 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0213%18 Jun
mirage13–10.0533%17 Jun
mirage13–100.0113%17 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0413%17 Jun
nuke13–70.0735%16 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0416%16 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0323%16 Jun
overpass13–110.0520%15 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0017%7 Jun
mirage6–130.0025%7 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0126%1 Jun
inferno15–150.0121%21 May
inferno9–130.0026%20 May
anubis9–13-0.0110%17 May
mirage13–90.0113%17 May
anubis11–13-0.0216%17 May
nuke13–90.0125%17 May
overpass9–13-0.0413%17 May
mirage8–130.0612%17 May
nuke0–13-0.0729%16 May
ancient10–13-0.0324%29 Apr
ancient11–130.0418%26 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0536%26 Apr
overpass13–90.0231%26 Apr
overpass6–13-0.0621%13 Apr
overpass13–90.0518%12 Apr
inferno1–13-0.0429%12 Apr
ancient13–50.0312%12 Apr
nuke13–110.0822%11 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0214%11 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0723%11 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0022%11 Apr
anubis13–70.0124%9 Apr
nuke15–150.0134%9 Apr
mirage13–90.0314%8 Apr
anubis14–160.0126%30 Mar
ancient9–130.0413%29 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →