Carter — CS2 Stats

US76561198139496324[U:1:179230596]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,100Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating17,893Purple band · top ~16.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7975 of 14391 tracked

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning62

Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–46–10Last 10044%Win rateWWLLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.3

Aggression9.0

Utility4.6

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels4.5

Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning6.2

Utility4.6

Mechanics8.2

Opening Duels4.5

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time587ms−70ms

first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms

Headshot accuracy15.4%+1.6%

first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–6

13–2Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

W2Current streak

7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

22Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11mirageWeakest map · 37% over 27

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	27	10–17	37%	-0.00
cache	B	18	9–9	50%	-0.01
dust2	C	18	7–11	39%	-0.01
inferno	A	11	7–4	64%	0.01
nuke	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.01
anubis	C	9	4–5	44%	0.01
ancient	C	8	3–5	38%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

915Matches

50%Win rate

1.05Avg K/D

80.8ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	205	52%	1.07	16.1
Dust2	128	42%	0.96	14.3
Ancient	96	45%	1.04	15.9
Anubis	96	55%	1.08	16.7
Inferno	64	39%	0.86	14.4
Nuke	61	56%	0.92	14.7
Overpass	56	55%	1.06	16.6
Cache	27	59%	1.00	16.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy

36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.4%Spray accuracy

86.8%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

588msReaction time

47.7%T opening success

48.4%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

3.4%Flash assists

12.24HE damage / grenade

2.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.4821 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–4	0.12	16%	27 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.06	14%	27 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.05	11%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	16%	24 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.01	15%	24 Aug →
mirage	6–2	0.01	11%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	16%	24 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	16%	24 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.05	13%	24 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.09	27%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	21%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.02	13%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.01	13%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.08	15%	19 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.04	11%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	19%	18 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	14%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.04	14%	18 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	12%	18 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	15%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.03	18%	18 Aug →
cache	16–12	0.01	14%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.04	11%	17 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.02	16%	17 Aug →
nuke	16–12	0.06	24%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.01	19%	17 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.09	8%	17 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.04	15%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	21%	17 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	9%	17 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.03	21%	17 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.03	22%	17 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	8%	17 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.05	27%	17 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.11	10%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.03	26%	17 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.03	16%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.05	16%	15 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	20%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	20%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	21%	15 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	18%	14 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.04	24%	13 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.05	19%	13 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.01	12%	13 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.01	17%	5 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.06	10%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	15%	2 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	11%	2 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.00	13%	2 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.02	12%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–2	-0.00	6%	31 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	10%	31 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	16%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–16	-0.02	15%	31 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.04	8%	31 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.05	15%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.07	14%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	10%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.06	8%	31 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	14%	31 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.01	11%	31 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	2%	31 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.05	15%	30 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	19%	30 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	6%	30 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	11%	30 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.01	14%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.00	11%	30 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	20%	30 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.03	18%	29 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.00	11%	29 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	19%	28 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.01	15%	28 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.02	8%	28 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.10	15%	28 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.00	15%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	11%	27 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.12	18%	27 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	14%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.06	15%	27 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	12%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	6%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	12%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.02	17%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.13	12%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	9%	19 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.08	9%	19 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.02	12%	19 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	9%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.09	24%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.10	13%	19 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	10%	18 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.07	4%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.06	14%	18 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	8%	18 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.05	10%	18 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.02	35%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.07	15%	18 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.02	19%	18 Jul →