BurntToast — CS2 Stats

US76561198137063405[U:1:176797677]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,049Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,606Purple band · top ~22% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#10278 of 17287 tracked

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning69

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateWWWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1

Aggression10.0

Utility6.0

Positioning6.9

Opening Duels4.4

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning6.9

Utility6.0

Mechanics7.4

Opening Duels4.5

Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time511ms−51ms

first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 511ms

Headshot accuracy15.2%+1.1%

first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — nuke 13–5

13–1Biggest win — dust2

9Longest win streak

W3Current streak

10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12dust2Weakest map · 41% over 17

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	20	13–7	65%	0.01
cache	B	19	10–9	53%	0.02
dust2	C	17	7–10	41%	0.02
nuke	B	15	7–8	47%	0.02
inferno	S	12	8–4	67%	0.04
anubis	B	10	5–5	50%	0.04
ancient	C	7	3–4	43%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

14Matches

43%Win rate

1.31Avg K/D

96.5ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

17%1v1 clutch win

31%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	6	17%	1.12	16.2
Nuke	3	100%	1.99	21.7
Overpass	2	50%	1.49	21.0
Dust2	2	50%	0.88	11.5
Inferno	1	0%	1.00	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy

36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.5%Spray accuracy

83.3%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

509msReaction time

28.6%T opening success

66.2%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

6.7%Flash assists

15.11HE damage / grenade

3.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.9646 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.6176% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–8	0.04	17%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.05	13%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.12	20%	25 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.04	18%	25 Aug →
mirage	7–1	0.01	9%	25 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.06	14%	24 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	19%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	5%	22 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.05	26%	22 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	10%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.03	15%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.04	25%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.02	13%	20 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	14%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	12%	19 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	7%	19 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	23%	19 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.14	26%	19 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	12%	19 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	16%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.09	11%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.08	10%	16 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	8%	15 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.03	17%	15 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.03	13%	15 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.05	13%	13 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.03	20%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	15%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.06	15%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.01	21%	11 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.03	24%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.01	14%	10 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.00	8%	10 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.01	16%	10 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.06	16%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.05	13%	10 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	18%	10 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.13	33%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.06	31%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.07	8%	10 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.02	24%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	23%	10 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	17%	10 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.06	12%	10 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.04	15%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.04	13%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.06	14%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	19%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.05	17%	2 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.01	28%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.00	19%	2 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	6%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	16%	30 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	12%	30 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.06	20%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.16	18%	29 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.06	17%	27 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.07	18%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	19%	26 Jul →
cache	3–13	0.01	14%	26 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.01	13%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	15%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.07	17%	26 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.06	12%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.10	34%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.06	26%	25 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	20%	22 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	21%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.12	16%	21 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.03	13%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.06	13%	20 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.06	9%	20 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.13	10%	20 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.02	23%	20 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.00	14%	20 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.02	19%	20 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.03	11%	20 Jul →
cache	12–16	-0.02	11%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.09	21%	19 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.08	7%	18 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.01	9%	16 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	8%	15 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	18%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.04	16%	13 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.03	17%	13 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	8%	13 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	13%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.00	18%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	13%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.07	8%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.09	23%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.06	15%	12 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.05	12%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.06	9%	12 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.02	17%	12 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.06	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	16%	12 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.01	13%	12 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.01	13%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.04	13%	11 Jul →