GoldenCoachTK — CS2 Stats

76561198135976545[U:1:175710817]

889Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,000Purple band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10513 of 16287 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGoldenCoachTKFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER15,000 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning57
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56413Last 10056%Win rateLLWWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9
Aggression9.2
Utility4.1
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.7
Utility4.1
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time505ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 13–4
134Biggest win — ancient
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 42% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC26111542%0.02
dust2A2516964%0.02
cacheB189950%0.01
nukeB105550%0.01
ancientS96367%0.01
infernoS96367%0.00
anubis330100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

154Matches
49%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
87.2ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2786%1.2717.1
Mirage650%1.3719.8
Nuke367%1.2816.3
Inferno2100%1.0020.0
Anubis250%0.9017.0
Ancient1100%1.2421.0
Overpass10%1.0021.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
76.0%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
512msReaction time
40.2%T opening success
56.0%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
10.50HE damage / grenade
5.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3574 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–13-0.0319%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0417%27 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0616%26 Aug
dust213–100.0920%26 Aug
dust20–13-0.0918%26 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0745%26 Aug
inferno13–110.0327%26 Aug
dust213–160.0822%25 Aug
inferno9–50.0220%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0522%25 Aug
anubis13–90.0315%25 Aug
dust213–50.0423%25 Aug
mirage7–130.0722%24 Aug
dust213–110.018%24 Aug
cache13–160.0126%24 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0215%24 Aug
ancient9–130.018%24 Aug
mirage13–110.0312%21 Aug
cache10–130.0115%21 Aug
dust213–40.0526%21 Aug
nuke13–80.0830%21 Aug
dust213–100.0111%20 Aug
ancient13–110.0236%20 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0119%20 Aug
cache13–100.0819%20 Aug
dust213–6-0.0229%20 Aug
cache13–100.0029%20 Aug
cache3–8-0.08100%19 Aug
dust213–50.0223%19 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0013%17 Aug
dust213–50.0123%17 Aug
mirage13–100.0621%17 Aug
mirage5–13-0.067%15 Aug
dust213–70.1025%15 Aug
ancient13–110.0123%15 Aug
dust26–13-0.0317%14 Aug
mirage5–90.1033%14 Aug
dust211–130.0614%13 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0211%13 Aug
ancient13–70.1214%13 Aug
nuke13–40.194%13 Aug
inferno9–6-0.0733%13 Aug
inferno9–10.0630%13 Aug
mirage11–130.0818%13 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0615%11 Aug
mirage13–80.0713%11 Aug
cache13–90.0010%11 Aug
cache13–90.0519%11 Aug
nuke13–70.0429%11 Aug
anubis13–4-0.025%10 Aug
dust213–7-0.0210%10 Aug
ancient13–70.0713%7 Aug
cache15–150.0419%7 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0513%5 Aug
mirage13–90.0026%5 Aug
dust215–150.0129%5 Aug
dust213–100.1212%5 Aug
dust210–130.0517%4 Aug
mirage13–60.0514%3 Aug
cache5–13-0.0424%3 Aug
cache10–130.0717%31 Jul
cache6–13-0.0511%31 Jul
dust26–130.0429%30 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0512%30 Jul
mirage10–130.0526%30 Jul
cache9–13-0.0727%29 Jul
cache13–110.0321%28 Jul
mirage10–130.0111%28 Jul
mirage13–80.0624%27 Jul
mirage13–100.0525%27 Jul
mirage8–130.0123%26 Jul
cache13–110.0230%18 Jul
dust211–13-0.0526%18 Jul
dust213–40.0525%17 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0210%17 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0316%14 Jul
nuke12–16-0.060%13 Jul
cache13–70.0826%13 Jul
dust213–90.0413%10 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0329%10 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0113%10 Jul
cache7–13-0.0233%9 Jul
cache13–60.0833%9 Jul
dust27–40.0638%8 Jul
cache13–100.0316%8 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0317%3 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0527%3 Jul
nuke13–110.0527%1 Jul
dust211–13-0.0414%30 Jun
mirage13–90.0625%30 Jun
dust213–8-0.0714%30 Jun
dust213–70.0423%29 Jun
mirage13–80.0313%29 Jun
anubis10–50.0325%29 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0625%29 Jun
mirage13–60.0016%22 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0125%20 Jun
inferno14–16-0.018%19 Jun
mirage7–130.067%19 Jun
inferno16–140.0127%18 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →