Annulleddeer — CS2 Stats

76561198135847058[U:1:175581330]

1,539Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,641Purple band · top ~17.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14194 of 26529 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAnnulleddeerFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,641 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning59
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5248Last 10052%Win rateLWLWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.4
Aggression7.1
Utility4.1
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.9
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time571ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — cache 13–8
131Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
57In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2081240%-0.01
infernoB1991047%0.02
nukeA169756%-0.00
ancientA127558%0.01
anubisD124833%0.01
cacheS86275%0.03
overpassA85363%-0.00
dust243175%0.03
train110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

621Matches
50%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
89.6ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1436%1.2516.2
Ancient1275%1.1820.5
Inferno875%1.5521.1
Anubis617%1.0919.3
Dust2580%1.7022.2
Nuke560%0.8113.2
Train250%1.0324.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
563msReaction time
34.4%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
10.41HE damage / grenade
5.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4051 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.3885% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno14–16-0.0320%27 Aug
dust213–90.0226%26 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0710%25 Aug
ancient13–30.0518%25 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0516%24 Aug
inferno13–100.0023%24 Aug
cache13–5-0.0220%23 Aug
anubis12–160.0218%23 Aug
mirage13–100.0517%22 Aug
anubis5–130.0114%21 Aug
inferno13–50.0912%21 Aug
anubis13–70.016%21 Aug
inferno13–10.0218%21 Aug
nuke13–100.0425%21 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0731%20 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0319%20 Aug
mirage13–40.0218%20 Aug
nuke6–130.0067%8 Aug
inferno7–10.10100%8 Aug
mirage13–110.0016%8 Aug
overpass13–60.0628%8 Aug
dust213–40.1116%8 Aug
anubis13–50.0518%8 Aug
nuke13–110.0225%8 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0224%8 Aug
cache11–130.0620%8 Aug
mirage8–130.0012%7 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0416%7 Aug
inferno8–130.0117%7 Aug
nuke13–100.0014%7 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0221%7 Aug
anubis9–130.0011%7 Aug
anubis10–13-0.055%6 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0826%6 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0013%6 Aug
nuke4–13-0.097%6 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0315%6 Aug
cache16–140.0124%6 Aug
ancient13–110.0319%6 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0219%3 Aug
nuke13–40.0618%3 Aug
inferno13–40.0520%2 Aug
nuke0–5-0.070%31 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0012%31 Jul
cache10–130.0322%31 Jul
inferno10–130.010%29 Jul
ancient13–100.0113%26 Jul
inferno9–130.0126%24 Jul
mirage13–70.0622%24 Jul
cache13–80.1116%24 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0116%20 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0115%17 Jul
cache13–100.0224%8 Jul
train13–50.0329%7 Jul
nuke8–130.0112%6 Jul
overpass13–70.0313%6 Jul
ancient13–70.0416%5 Jul
ancient13–160.0316%27 Jun
cache13–80.0124%26 Jun
anubis13–60.0918%26 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0414%25 Jun
nuke13–11-0.059%25 Jun
inferno13–60.0928%17 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0415%3 Jun
anubis13–70.0117%3 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0020%3 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0316%2 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0418%27 May
mirage13–90.0218%27 May
nuke7–13-0.0319%26 May
mirage8–13-0.0226%21 May
mirage6–13-0.0720%19 May
nuke13–90.1017%19 May
nuke7–130.0121%11 May
dust213–100.0121%6 May
cache13–10-0.0015%30 Apr
nuke11–130.0218%28 Apr
anubis10–130.0811%28 Apr
inferno9–130.0818%28 Apr
mirage7–130.0424%28 Apr
overpass13–8-0.033%28 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0429%28 Apr
overpass10–130.0314%27 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0118%26 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0012%26 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0121%25 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0223%25 Apr
dust210–13-0.0214%25 Apr
mirage13–5-0.104%25 Apr
inferno13–30.0322%22 Apr
ancient13–90.0317%22 Apr
anubis9–130.0012%19 Apr
ancient13–50.0715%17 Apr
mirage13–50.0430%17 Apr
nuke13–6-0.0429%16 Apr
overpass13–3-0.0317%16 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0714%16 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0215%16 Apr
inferno13–50.0314%14 Apr
nuke13–100.0116%14 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →