ElMacko — CS2 Stats

76561198135734033[U:1:175468305]

748Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,244Purple band · top ~19.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18578 of 34645 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGElMackoPREMIER17,244 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning50
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54433Last 10054%Win rateLLLLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression6.1
Utility3.9
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.0
Utility3.9
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time592ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 634ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy11.9%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 10.8% → last ⅓ avg 11.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — anubis 13–1
130Biggest win — cache
7Longest win streak
L4Current streak
810In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 14infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB25131252%-0.01
ancientS1410471%-0.01
cacheB147750%-0.00
nukeA148657%-0.00
anubisB147750%0.01
infernoD124833%-0.02
dust2S75271%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

105Matches
48%Win rate
0.80Avg K/D
72.4ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1560%0.9713.9
Inferno944%0.8511.4
Dust2922%0.6210.7
Ancient850%1.0314.6
Nuke888%1.0015.5
Anubis560%0.9915.0
Cache560%0.9412.8
Overpass10%0.5610.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.3%Headshot accuracy
40.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.6%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
590msReaction time
38.2%T opening success
37.2%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
9.30HE damage / grenade
1.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.3289% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.405 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.1531% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.0611%29 Aug
ancient11–13-0.018%29 Aug
cache10–13-0.057%26 Aug
nuke11–13-0.049%26 Aug
anubis13–60.0723%26 Aug
nuke13–90.0019%23 Aug
ancient13–100.0210%23 Aug
anubis13–20.1011%23 Aug
nuke16–13-0.046%23 Aug
nuke11–130.0416%21 Aug
inferno7–13-0.106%19 Aug
mirage13–60.0114%18 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0024%18 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0518%16 Aug
ancient13–5-0.069%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0516%16 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0412%16 Aug
dust213–40.0110%16 Aug
anubis13–50.0219%13 Aug
mirage13–40.056%13 Aug
ancient13–60.0113%13 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0117%13 Aug
mirage13–100.0114%13 Aug
ancient13–9-0.009%13 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0614%13 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0312%10 Aug
mirage15–150.0110%7 Aug
ancient13–80.0211%7 Aug
ancient13–20.098%7 Aug
mirage13–10.096%7 Aug
anubis13–100.0110%7 Aug
mirage13–11-0.019%6 Aug
mirage13–90.066%6 Aug
nuke13–110.027%6 Aug
dust27–13-0.0118%5 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0316%5 Aug
anubis13–10.1016%5 Aug
dust213–60.0218%5 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0110%5 Aug
cache13–20.0118%5 Aug
dust211–13-0.0511%5 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0212%5 Aug
anubis13–11-0.027%2 Aug
mirage6–130.0613%2 Aug
inferno11–13-0.109%2 Aug
cache10–13-0.0315%2 Aug
dust213–40.049%2 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0110%31 Jul
dust213–10-0.0319%31 Jul
inferno13–40.0920%31 Jul
mirage13–30.0112%31 Jul
cache13–80.0815%31 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0610%31 Jul
mirage3–13-0.1210%31 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0014%31 Jul
dust216–14-0.018%31 Jul
nuke13–70.025%31 Jul
cache5–13-0.0310%31 Jul
anubis13–40.0211%31 Jul
anubis5–13-0.087%30 Jul
inferno8–130.037%29 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0411%29 Jul
inferno3–13-0.078%26 Jul
mirage2–10-0.0627%26 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0113%26 Jul
cache6–13-0.039%26 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0211%25 Jul
cache13–10-0.007%24 Jul
cache10–13-0.0316%24 Jul
nuke13–11-0.017%24 Jul
cache13–10.0312%23 Jul
inferno13–20.038%23 Jul
mirage15–150.0310%23 Jul
cache7–130.0013%19 Jul
nuke5–130.0115%19 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0210%18 Jul
ancient13–110.0114%18 Jul
mirage16–12-0.034%18 Jul
ancient13–6-0.009%18 Jul
inferno10–13-0.028%18 Jul
ancient13–90.0014%18 Jul
inferno13–4-0.016%18 Jul
anubis10–130.0011%17 Jul
mirage4–13-0.1012%17 Jul
nuke13–20.048%17 Jul
mirage13–110.0518%15 Jul
mirage13–70.0515%14 Jul
mirage11–13-0.045%14 Jul
cache13–00.0016%14 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0114%14 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0810%14 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0611%14 Jul
cache13–5-0.028%13 Jul
inferno13–10-0.048%13 Jul
cache9–130.0615%9 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0110%9 Jul
inferno9–13-0.047%8 Jul
nuke12–120.0116%8 Jul
cache13–8-0.0411%8 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0510%8 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →