7emzu — CS2 Stats

76561198133951666[U:1:173685938]

2,370Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,017 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG7emzuFACEITLevel 9 · 2,017 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning42
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5941Last 10059%Win rateLLLLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression1.8
Utility5.6
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 46 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning4.2
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time536ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — ancient 13–8
131Biggest win — nuke
9Longest win streak
L4Current streak
144In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA30191163%0.01
anubisA1810856%0.00
nukeS1711665%-0.01
infernoC1771041%-0.02
mirageB84450%-0.00
cacheS75271%0.00
boulder110100%-0.03
train110100%-0.03
fachwerk110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,113Matches
50%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
75.1ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient27352%1.0916.0
Inferno22053%1.0615.8
Anubis20351%1.0415.2
Mirage18543%1.0015.2
Nuke15352%1.0416.1
Dust210244%1.0715.8
Overpass4055%0.9915.8
Cache3751%1.1015.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.4%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
533msReaction time
16.0%T opening success
46.3%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
12.31HE damage / grenade
8.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4976 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.0017% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.026%29 Aug
anubis4–130.0418%28 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0121%25 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0319%25 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0620%25 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0314%24 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0719%24 Aug
ancient13–110.0224%24 Aug
cache13–5-0.0320%24 Aug
anubis19–17-0.0223%23 Aug
ancient13–90.1030%23 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0313%21 Aug
mirage13–100.0620%20 Aug
inferno13–90.0222%19 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0517%18 Aug
inferno10–13-0.059%17 Aug
ancient13–80.0511%17 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0223%17 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0215%17 Aug
ancient8–130.009%17 Aug
ancient13–30.0922%17 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0214%17 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0311%16 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0613%16 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0920%16 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0718%16 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0116%16 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0420%16 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0315%15 Aug
inferno13–30.056%15 Aug
cache11–13-0.0030%15 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0414%15 Aug
inferno13–90.0124%15 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0420%15 Aug
ancient13–50.0218%15 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0629%14 Aug
anubis13–50.0525%14 Aug
nuke5–130.0338%14 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0022%14 Aug
nuke13–9-0.059%14 Aug
cache7–13-0.0527%14 Aug
ancient19–150.0124%14 Aug
ancient2–130.0015%14 Aug
anubis13–110.0218%14 Aug
inferno4–13-0.060%13 Aug
inferno4–13-0.068%13 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0617%12 Aug
anubis13–60.0313%12 Aug
nuke13–70.0818%12 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0716%12 Aug
mirage4–130.078%12 Aug
anubis9–130.0120%12 Aug
anubis16–140.0321%12 Aug
anubis13–50.0320%12 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0223%11 Aug
ancient13–110.0617%11 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0119%11 Aug
ancient13–80.0411%11 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0111%5 Aug
ancient13–50.0715%5 Aug
anubis9–130.0021%4 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0124%3 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0114%3 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0313%2 Aug
cache13–70.0311%2 Aug
cache13–90.0213%31 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0124%30 Jul
ancient16–130.0616%29 Jul
ancient10–130.0112%29 Jul
mirage13–8-0.018%29 Jul
boulder13–4-0.0320%29 Jul
train13–5-0.035%29 Jul
anubis10–13-0.037%28 Jul
ancient13–20.027%27 Jul
inferno16–140.0213%27 Jul
cache13–110.0220%27 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0110%27 Jul
anubis13–70.0411%27 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0127%25 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0020%25 Jul
inferno13–80.0016%25 Jul
ancient13–80.1020%24 Jul
mirage10–13-0.069%24 Jul
anubis13–60.0136%23 Jul
inferno9–130.0016%23 Jul
fachwerk13–100.0015%22 Jul
ancient8–130.0215%21 Jul
inferno3–13-0.1028%20 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0514%18 Jul
ancient13–70.0621%16 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0030%16 Jul
nuke13–10.0615%16 Jul
nuke19–150.0212%15 Jul
anubis7–13-0.103%15 Jul
nuke16–140.0113%14 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0322%14 Jul
inferno6–13-0.064%14 Jul
nuke13–70.0318%13 Jul
inferno13–80.0920%13 Jul
cache13–50.0426%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →