KlifDaMan

KlifDaMan — CS2 Stats

CA76561198133219956[U:1:172954228]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

610Tracked matches36%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,420Blue band · top ~36.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23806 of 35963 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKlifDaManPREMIER13,420 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning40
Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45478Last 10045%Win rateLWLLLWLTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression3.8
Utility3.2
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.1

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.0
Utility3.2
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact0.2

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time597ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–3
131Biggest win — anubis
8Longest win streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 37% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C27101737%-0.00
mirageB178947%0.02
infernoB157847%-0.02
nukeC125742%-0.03
ancientA117464%0.00
cacheC94544%-0.00
anubisB84450%-0.00
train1010%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
597msReaction time
17.7%T opening success
51.3%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
0.7%Flash assists
7.00HE damage / grenade
5.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3678 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.6826% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–13-0.1012%29 Jul
nuke13–60.0322%28 Jul
anubis9–130.027%28 Jul
dust210–13-0.0219%21 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0613%21 Jul
ancient13–100.0218%19 Jul
nuke8–13-0.027%19 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0013%19 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0925%19 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0810%18 Jul
dust20–13-0.0319%18 Jul
mirage13–50.0334%18 Jul
dust213–8-0.0315%18 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0613%18 Jul
inferno13–9-0.005%18 Jul
mirage10–130.0116%18 Jul
ancient13–110.0215%17 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0217%17 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0415%14 Jul
anubis13–100.0420%14 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0119%12 Jul
inferno8–13-0.039%12 Jul
nuke7–13-0.098%12 Jul
dust213–11-0.0320%12 Jul
mirage9–130.0312%12 Jul
mirage5–130.0011%12 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0022%12 Jul
dust216–130.0319%12 Jul
mirage13–160.0011%12 Jul
dust210–13-0.0514%12 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0317%12 Jul
ancient13–60.0320%12 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0123%12 Jul
mirage10–130.0415%11 Jul
dust213–80.0216%11 Jul
nuke5–13-0.047%11 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0720%11 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0719%11 Jul
dust23–13-0.0313%11 Jul
cache10–130.0316%11 Jul
inferno13–60.0122%11 Jul
cache5–13-0.0317%11 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0117%11 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0935%11 Jul
anubis13–80.0616%11 Jul
anubis13–10.0234%11 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0527%11 Jul
dust24–13-0.0226%11 Jul
cache13–80.0531%8 Jul
inferno5–130.0245%7 Jul
dust213–7-0.0414%6 Jul
ancient13–60.0019%6 Jul
cache13–9-0.0215%5 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0812%5 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0313%5 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0815%5 Jul
dust213–11-0.0020%5 Jul
cache12–120.0019%5 Jul
anubis13–50.0319%5 Jul
ancient13–6-0.019%5 Jul
dust213–9-0.0218%5 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0116%5 Jul
mirage13–100.0210%4 Jul
cache13–70.0214%4 Jul
ancient13–100.0317%4 Jul
inferno13–60.0521%4 Jul
dust212–120.0116%4 Jul
mirage13–100.0113%4 Jul
dust213–50.0921%4 Jul
dust213–60.1116%3 Jul
cache6–13-0.0613%3 Jul
dust22–13-0.0122%3 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0114%3 Jul
nuke13–100.1310%2 Jul
mirage13–100.068%2 Jul
ancient4–00.1125%2 Jul
dust29–130.0211%2 Jul
dust28–13-0.0621%2 Jul
cache8–13-0.0316%1 Jul
inferno13–90.0310%1 Jul
mirage13–30.1511%1 Jul
mirage13–40.0622%1 Jul
dust23–13-0.0611%1 Jul
dust28–13-0.0112%1 Jul
ancient5–130.0113%1 Jul
cache13–7-0.0013%1 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0211%1 Jul
dust211–130.0310%1 Jul
dust212–120.0421%30 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0112%30 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0812%30 Jun
dust212–120.0719%26 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0710%26 Jun
dust213–10-0.0313%25 Jun
inferno13–30.0016%25 Jun
anubis3–5-0.058%25 Jun
nuke13–110.0211%23 Jun
train9–13-0.0714%23 Jun
dust212–12-0.0217%21 Jun
dust212–120.0412%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →