OGQuacker — CS2 Stats

76561198131297200[U:1:171031472]VAC banned

1,633Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.3 Developing

Premier CS Rating16,534Purple band · top ~22.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12084 of 20466 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56

Positioning40

Utility32

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateLWLLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6

Aggression2.2

Utility3.2

Positioning4.0

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 34% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 623ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6

Positioning4.0

Utility3.2

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels0.5

Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time642ms−27ms

first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 642ms

Headshot accuracy21.1%+1.3%

first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — anubis 13–3

13–0Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 72% over 18dust2Weakest map · 45% over 20

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	29	15–14	52%	-0.00
dust2	B	20	9–11	45%	-0.02
anubis	S	18	13–5	72%	-0.01
ancient	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.01
nuke	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.01
vertigo	A	5	3–2	60%	0.00
mirage	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.03
inferno	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.06
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

215Matches

51%Win rate

0.93Avg K/D

70.7ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win

31%1v2 clutch win

19Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Anubis	49	63%	0.92	13.7
Ancient	33	58%	0.91	14.6
Vertigo	33	55%	0.96	15.9
Mirage	15	27%	0.71	11.5
Dust2	15	53%	0.87	13.5
Inferno	14	64%	0.78	12.6
Nuke	13	31%	0.81	13.5
Cache	9	56%	1.01	12.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy

33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.4%Spray accuracy

77.7%Counter-strafing

13.2°Preaim

623msReaction time

18.2%T opening success

34.2%CT opening success

0.47Enemies flashed / flash

0.0%Flash assists

11.16HE damage / grenade

2.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 13.1629° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4659 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	2–13	-0.05	17%	23 Aug →
anubis	19–17	-0.03	20%	23 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	24%	22 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.01	16%	22 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.02	20%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.07	10%	22 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	-0.02	24%	16 Aug →
vertigo	16–12	0.01	24%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	19%	16 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.10	26%	16 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	24%	16 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.02	9%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.02	25%	10 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.08	21%	10 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	19%	10 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	12%	9 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.07	13%	9 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.08	17%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	5%	9 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	16%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.12	31%	9 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.08	22%	8 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.02	23%	8 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.07	27%	8 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.05	34%	8 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.08	14%	8 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	33%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–0	-0.03	23%	8 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.01	21%	7 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	17%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	34%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	24%	7 Aug →
mirage	2–7	-0.09	33%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.04	9%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.05	23%	2 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.06	29%	2 Aug →
inferno	9–5	-0.06	6%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.00	18%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.01	20%	2 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.02	25%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.06	17%	2 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	0.07	21%	2 Aug →
anubis	9–5	-0.02	27%	2 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.06	17%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–1	-0.00	32%	2 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.00	24%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	23%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	26%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.00	18%	1 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.09	15%	1 Aug →
fachwerk	9–13	-0.00	30%	26 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.00	10%	26 Jul →
shelter	4–13	-0.05	38%	26 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.01	23%	25 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	16%	25 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.04	21%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.02	13%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.08	16%	25 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.01	19%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.00	25%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.04	16%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.08	18%	24 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.02	27%	24 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.06	6%	24 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.08	21%	24 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.03	19%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	32%	24 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.02	20%	24 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.06	13%	24 Jul →
vertigo	7–9	-0.01	19%	24 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.06	19%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	10%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.03	10%	24 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.02	0%	24 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.00	15%	24 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.02	23%	24 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	24%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	19%	24 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.07	11%	23 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	25%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	21%	23 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	14%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	12%	23 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.01	25%	23 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	24%	23 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	22%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.01	27%	22 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	19%	22 Jul →
cache	11–7	0.05	48%	22 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.01	28%	20 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.00	20%	19 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.12	18%	19 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	21%	19 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.01	13%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.07	28%	19 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.01	30%	19 Jul →
cache	13–16	-0.05	23%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.02	33%	19 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	15%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.06	9%	18 Jul →