magnus carlsen — CS2 Stats

76561198131012121[U:1:170746393]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,677Tracked matches60%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating23,040Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6340 of 26395 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,676 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning57

Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–46–1Last 10053%Win rateWLWWWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5

Aggression6.3

Utility3.7

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels3.1

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning5.7

Utility3.7

Mechanics6.6

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time551ms−53ms

first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms

Headshot accuracy23.4%+2.8%

first ⅓ avg 20.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — dust2 13–11

13–0Biggest win — dust2

9Longest win streak

4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 9nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	41	22–19	54%	0.01
dust2	A	23	14–9	61%	0.01
anubis	B	10	5–5	50%	0.01
ancient	S	9	6–3	67%	0.04
cache	B	8	4–4	50%	0.00
nuke	D	5	1–4	20%	0.02
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	0.00
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

546Matches

52%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

85.1ADR

56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	207	56%	1.17	18.8
Dust2	103	49%	1.04	16.4
Ancient	61	46%	1.14	16.3
Anubis	45	69%	1.22	16.9
Inferno	39	49%	1.14	15.4
Nuke	35	37%	1.11	16.0
Vertigo	24	67%	1.36	19.5
Cache	17	35%	1.02	15.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy

38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.9%Spray accuracy

79.6%Counter-strafing

9.6°Preaim

549msReaction time

28.6%T opening success

56.5%CT opening success

0.43Enemies flashed / flash

5.5%Flash assists

4.43HE damage / grenade

5.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4259 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.5737% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–7	0.06	28%	27 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.02	22%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.10	16%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	20%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.00	17%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.06	20%	23 Aug →
mirage	18–22	-0.04	12%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	28%	18 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.00	25%	18 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	24%	18 Aug →
mirage	19–16	0.04	24%	18 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.00	28%	17 Aug →
mirage	23–25	0.01	21%	17 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	24%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.02	23%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.01	25%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	28%	16 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	40%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.00	16%	15 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.00	12%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–0	0.02	21%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	33%	14 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.04	22%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.05	19%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.03	24%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.04	20%	11 Aug →
vertigo	6–9	-0.05	35%	11 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	23%	11 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	24%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	27%	10 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	37%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.04	19%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	20%	10 Aug →
dust2	19–15	-0.05	20%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	12%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.03	40%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.06	23%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.06	26%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.02	20%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.03	23%	7 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.02	21%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.10	32%	7 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.06	29%	6 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	26%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.00	14%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.04	34%	6 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	17%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.10	35%	6 Aug →
dust2	9–1	0.03	29%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	26%	5 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.00	24%	5 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.02	24%	5 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.03	22%	5 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	17%	4 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.01	15%	4 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.10	20%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.06	19%	4 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.05	28%	4 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.00	24%	3 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	16%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.04	28%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.10	24%	3 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	34%	3 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	24%	3 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.01	30%	3 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.05	24%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.04	20%	3 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.03	22%	3 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	23%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	30%	1 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.01	19%	1 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.04	27%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	21%	31 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.01	18%	30 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	28%	30 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.10	23%	30 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.01	10%	30 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	22%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.05	27%	30 Jul →
inferno	14–16	0.03	21%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	14%	30 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	18%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	26%	30 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.10	23%	30 Jul →
nuke	3–9	-0.06	9%	29 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.08	14%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.07	33%	29 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	18%	29 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.06	16%	29 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.03	13%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	10%	24 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.10	30%	24 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	22%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	21%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.03	21%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.00	21%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.07	9%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.00	21%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.00	26%	19 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.05	24%	19 Jul →