ZhuA1 — CS2 Stats

US76561198129939965[U:1:169674237]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,405Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since

3,733Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating27,098Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#737 of 13844 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,882 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	57.2%	52.8%	above
Shot accuracy	17.6%	13.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.13	1.08	above
Match win rate	41.2%	49.2%	8.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86

Positioning49

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateWWWLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.6

Aggression3.0

Utility5.2

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels0.7

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6

Positioning4.9

Utility5.2

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels0.7

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time564ms−60ms

first ⅓ avg 623ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms

Headshot accuracy26.4%+2.8%

first ⅓ avg 23.7% → last ⅓ avg 26.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 13–9

13–3Biggest win — anubis

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 68% over 25ancientWeakest map · 40% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	33	15–18	45%	0.01
inferno	S	25	17–8	68%	0.01
mirage	B	24	13–11	54%	0.03
anubis	C	9	4–5	44%	0.01
ancient	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.01
nuke	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.00
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

125,523Lifetime kills

1.13K/D · Top 50% of tracked players

4,691Matches

41.2%Match win rate

57.2%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players

17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players

12,892MVPs

2,931Hours (in match)

3,242Bombs planted

1,281Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4757,710

M4A4 / M4A1-S23,327

AWP10,312

Desert Eagle9,543

P2000 / USP-S6,021

Glock-183,376

SSG 082,975

Galil AR2,337

SG 5531,528

FAMAS1,443

Lifetime map wins

17,914dust2

10,881inferno

894nuke

748train

610vertigo

39assault

27lake

13office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

962Matches

53%Win rate

1.18Avg K/D

76.1ADR

57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	136	52%	1.18	17.5
Inferno	123	54%	1.16	16.7
Dust2	105	55%	1.08	16.0
Ancient	45	47%	1.13	16.4
Anubis	37	27%	1.04	14.6
Nuke	30	43%	1.02	16.7
Overpass	18	28%	0.86	13.1
Vertigo	9	33%	0.92	15.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.7%Headshot accuracy

36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.0%Spray accuracy

87.2%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

580msReaction time

31.2%T opening success

34.8%CT opening success

0.51Enemies flashed / flash

6.6%Flash assists

11.14HE damage / grenade

9.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.1532% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–8	0.04	30%	25 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.00	34%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.08	12%	21 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.04	41%	20 Aug →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	29%	20 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	18%	20 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.01	34%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.01	28%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	39%	19 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	30%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.00	38%	15 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	19%	15 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.01	25%	13 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.10	17%	13 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	43%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.05	28%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.04	45%	11 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	21%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	31%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	20%	3 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.01	22%	3 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	32%	2 Aug →
dust2	0–2	-0.06	0%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.07	20%	31 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	10%	31 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	23%	31 Jul →
inferno	0–4	-0.09	0%	29 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	30%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.07	23%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.00	16%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.09	41%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.02	35%	27 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	38%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.01	13%	26 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.03	19%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	32%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.03	27%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.08	28%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.08	18%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.04	20%	21 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	27%	19 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.02	37%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	20%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.03	42%	17 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	12%	17 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.03	26%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	18%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	21%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.00	25%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.08	30%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.02	22%	11 Jul →
anubis	16–19	0.03	26%	7 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.05	29%	7 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.04	20%	6 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.02	26%	5 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.03	28%	5 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.05	30%	5 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.07	22%	4 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.03	28%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.03	46%	4 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	23%	4 Jul →
overpass	9–13	-0.01	23%	4 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.06	38%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	19%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.09	31%	29 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.05	19%	29 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	19%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.09	40%	28 Jun →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	41%	28 Jun →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	16%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.05	17%	27 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.01	28%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.01	16%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.04	28%	27 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.09	21%	27 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.04	25%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.06	33%	25 Jun →
mirage	11–13	0.00	31%	25 Jun →
ancient	6–13	0.03	19%	25 Jun →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	14%	24 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.06	16%	24 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	28%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.11	33%	23 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.03	28%	22 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	13%	22 Jun →
anubis	10–13	0.04	13%	22 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	25%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.10	24%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.08	31%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.04	18%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.11	31%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.07	22%	21 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.01	30%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.10	24%	21 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.02	21%	21 Jun →
inferno	13–7	0.00	20%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.10	19%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.06	18%	21 Jun →
dust2	14–16	0.02	20%	13 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	20%	30 May →