K1W0 — CS2 Stats

DE76561198126475509[U:1:166209781]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

598Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning48

Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–42–5Last 10053%Win rateWWTWLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3

Aggression6.0

Utility3.4

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels1.7

Clutch1.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 678ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning4.8

Utility3.4

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels1.7

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time678ms−10ms

first ⅓ avg 688ms → last ⅓ avg 678ms

Headshot accuracy22.2%+1.7%

first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — inferno 9–4

13–2Biggest win — inferno

7Longest win streak

W2Current streak

9–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 68% over 28nukeWeakest map · 36% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	S	28	19–9	68%	0.00
dust2	B	19	10–9	53%	-0.03
nuke	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.02
ancient	B	14	7–7	50%	-0.02
overpass	B	11	5–6	45%	-0.03
cache	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.03
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
alpine	—	2	0–2	0%	0.03
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.02
mirage	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.12
sanctum	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

111Matches

58%Win rate

1.14Avg K/D

58.2ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	2	50%	0.76	12.5
Dust2	1	100%	1.05	23.0
Nuke	1	0%	0.35	6.0
Anubis	1	0%	0.28	5.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.5%Spray accuracy

81.6%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

678msReaction time

30.5%T opening success

43.3%CT opening success

0.41Enemies flashed / flash

6.2%Flash assists

5.60HE damage / grenade

4.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4117 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.4753% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–9	-0.04	43%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.01	12%	1 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	17%	21 Jun →
cache	13–8	-0.05	14%	21 Jun →
cache	8–13	-0.07	23%	21 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.07	22%	21 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.09	23%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	40%	20 Jun →
dust2	16–14	0.01	14%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	16%	20 Jun →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	11%	20 Jun →
overpass	13–3	0.06	6%	20 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	5%	19 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	19%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.04	14%	19 Jun →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	16%	19 Jun →
inferno	9–4	0.24	35%	19 Jun →
nuke	4–9	-0.01	25%	19 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	31%	18 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	13%	18 Jun →
anubis	6–13	-0.00	13%	18 Jun →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	19%	15 Jun →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	23%	10 Jun →
alpine	10–13	-0.01	22%	10 Jun →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	15%	8 Jun →
overpass	5–9	-0.10	32%	4 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	25%	2 Jun →
overpass	11–13	-0.09	17%	31 May →
cache	12–12	-0.02	35%	3 May →
alpine	3–3	0.06	50%	3 May →
cache	13–5	0.07	25%	3 May →
ancient	15–15	-0.06	30%	28 Apr →
nuke	7–13	-0.07	27%	16 Apr →
overpass	13–16	0.02	22%	16 Apr →
nuke	1–13	-0.12	38%	10 Apr →
dust2	13–11	0.01	18%	10 Apr →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	20%	10 Apr →
overpass	13–9	-0.01	22%	10 Apr →
nuke	13–8	-0.01	24%	10 Apr →
inferno	13–2	0.05	22%	10 Apr →
mirage	13–3	0.02	35%	10 Apr →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	30%	10 Apr →
inferno	13–4	0.01	17%	10 Apr →
nuke	13–5	0.03	17%	10 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.03	18%	10 Apr →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	30%	10 Apr →
dust2	13–16	-0.06	22%	2 Apr →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	31%	2 Apr →
overpass	13–10	0.04	20%	2 Apr →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	32%	29 Mar →
overpass	11–13	-0.07	30%	29 Mar →
poseidon	3–9	-0.12	20%	29 Mar →
dust2	16–14	-0.06	28%	26 Mar →
inferno	8–8	0.03	33%	21 Mar →
inferno	9–4	-0.03	33%	21 Mar →
inferno	9–5	0.15	20%	21 Mar →
overpass	4–13	-0.04	17%	17 Mar →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	27%	17 Mar →
inferno	13–2	0.11	43%	16 Mar →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	22%	16 Mar →
dust2	10–13	0.01	36%	16 Mar →
inferno	13–8	0.02	21%	15 Mar →
inferno	13–7	-0.00	24%	15 Mar →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	13%	15 Mar →
dust2	13–9	-0.07	15%	15 Mar →
overpass	13–10	-0.01	24%	15 Mar →
overpass	3–13	-0.10	4%	14 Mar →
inferno	9–13	-0.06	21%	14 Mar →
ancient	13–5	-0.04	30%	14 Mar →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	21%	14 Mar →
inferno	8–13	-0.07	29%	14 Mar →
ancient	13–5	0.02	12%	14 Mar →
dust2	13–5	-0.06	22%	14 Mar →
inferno	9–4	0.00	50%	14 Mar →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	24%	13 Mar →
nuke	13–10	-0.06	18%	13 Mar →
overpass	13–4	-0.02	11%	12 Mar →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	9%	12 Mar →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	27%	12 Mar →
ancient	13–11	0.03	17%	12 Mar →
sanctum	7–9	-0.13	16%	12 Mar →
nuke	8–13	0.00	19%	12 Mar →
inferno	13–7	-0.03	14%	12 Mar →
nuke	14–16	-0.06	27%	2 Mar →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	10%	2 Mar →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	29%	2 Mar →
ancient	3–13	-0.08	24%	21 Feb →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	26%	21 Feb →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	20%	17 Feb →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	17%	17 Feb →
ancient	13–4	-0.09	20%	17 Feb →
nuke	10–13	0.00	28%	15 Feb →
ancient	13–8	-0.00	6%	15 Feb →
vertigo	13–4	-0.06	17%	15 Feb →
vertigo	13–2	0.01	24%	15 Feb →
dust2	5–13	0.03	21%	15 Feb →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	14%	15 Feb →
inferno	5–13	-0.05	21%	15 Feb →
inferno	4–13	0.01	15%	14 Feb →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	18%	14 Feb →