Gracie M1 Abrams — CS2 Stats

US76561198125224076[U:1:164958348]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,269Tracked matches65%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidClutch Specialist

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65

Positioning54

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–42–9Last 10049%Win rateWWWLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion well above par.

Aim6.5

Aggression5.8

Utility3.1

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels1.6

Clutch10.0

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5

Positioning5.4

Utility3.1

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels1.6

Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time617ms+36ms

first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms

Headshot accuracy19.4%−1.4%

first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — cache 13–3

13–1Biggest win — office

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 63% over 49mirageWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
office	A	49	31–18	63%	0.02
dust2	D	15	5–10	33%	0.04
mirage	D	10	3–7	30%	-0.02
nuke	A	9	5–4	56%	0.01
cache	—	4	1–3	25%	0.06
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.10
anubis	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.04
vertigo	—	3	1–2	33%	0.01
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.08
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03
alpine	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

100Matches

47%Win rate

0.87Avg K/D

91.1ADR

36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Vertigo	5	20%	0.92	15.4
Inferno	3	67%	1.16	15.3
Mirage	3	33%	0.78	12.7
Ancient	1	100%	1.62	13.0
Anubis	1	100%	1.70	17.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy

32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.3%Spray accuracy

80.5%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

615msReaction time

35.2%T opening success

37.7%CT opening success

0.39Enemies flashed / flash

4.7%Flash assists

6.58HE damage / grenade

6.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.3922 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.24% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–7	0.03	17%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	16%	24 Aug →
office	13–9	-0.05	21%	21 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	12%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.03	16%	19 Aug →
office	13–8	0.03	27%	14 Aug →
office	5–13	-0.02	16%	14 Aug →
office	13–6	-0.03	16%	11 Aug →
train	4–13	0.02	21%	8 Aug →
office	9–13	-0.03	31%	7 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.16	25%	7 Aug →
inferno	2–9	-0.19	16%	3 Aug →
office	13–7	0.04	13%	3 Aug →
office	13–8	-0.04	13%	2 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	13%	30 Jul →
office	13–9	0.03	21%	21 Jul →
office	13–9	0.06	26%	21 Jul →
office	13–5	0.02	23%	19 Jul →
office	13–7	0.01	22%	14 Jul →
office	12–12	0.06	19%	14 Jul →
office	13–5	0.09	24%	2 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.07	22%	1 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.03	18%	30 Jun →
office	13–7	0.09	28%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	17%	28 Jun →
cache	6–13	0.10	13%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.06	16%	27 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.02	28%	26 Jun →
office	13–9	-0.03	26%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.16	28%	26 Jun →
office	12–12	0.04	20%	24 Jun →
office	2–5	-0.09	0%	24 Jun →
inferno	16–14	-0.03	18%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–10	0.05	12%	24 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	24%	24 Jun →
anubis	13–16	-0.05	16%	23 Jun →
office	9–13	-0.02	13%	19 Jun →
anubis	15–15	-0.02	16%	17 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.18	21%	17 Jun →
office	13–11	0.03	15%	10 Jun →
office	13–10	0.06	23%	9 Jun →
office	10–4	0.09	15%	8 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	0.06	15%	8 Jun →
office	13–6	0.06	25%	2 Jun →
nuke	12–16	0.07	23%	29 May →
dust2	13–7	0.08	23%	28 May →
overpass	6–4	0.08	17%	28 May →
office	13–5	0.10	21%	25 May →
dust2	6–13	0.11	20%	21 May →
dust2	5–13	0.01	12%	21 May →
nuke	6–13	0.01	6%	20 May →
office	8–13	0.08	14%	19 May →
office	13–1	-0.02	18%	19 May →
dust2	9–13	0.03	13%	11 May →
mirage	14–16	-0.07	15%	9 May →
dust2	8–13	0.01	16%	6 May →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	15%	6 May →
mirage	9–13	0.01	13%	2 May →
office	13–6	0.07	42%	2 May →
office	13–8	0.12	26%	27 Apr →
nuke	13–10	0.01	33%	24 Apr →
office	7–13	-0.03	14%	24 Apr →
office	9–13	0.05	22%	12 Apr →
vertigo	12–12	0.02	13%	11 Apr →
vertigo	9–13	-0.05	6%	11 Apr →
nuke	13–5	-0.01	21%	6 Apr →
office	13–1	-0.04	33%	6 Apr →
office	12–12	-0.10	25%	6 Apr →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	16%	6 Apr →
office	6–13	-0.03	18%	6 Apr →
office	9–13	-0.03	24%	4 Apr →
office	11–13	0.01	39%	1 Apr →
office	10–13	-0.00	35%	1 Apr →
office	13–5	-0.01	38%	31 Mar →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	29%	27 Mar →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	13%	27 Mar →
office	11–13	0.02	13%	20 Mar →
office	7–1	0.13	29%	20 Mar →
office	13–7	0.06	12%	18 Mar →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	31%	17 Mar →
poseidon	8–8	0.03	18%	17 Mar →
inferno	5–9	-0.07	6%	17 Mar →
office	6–13	-0.06	8%	16 Mar →
office	13–8	0.04	12%	15 Mar →
office	13–7	-0.00	19%	13 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	15%	13 Mar →
office	12–12	0.12	25%	12 Mar →
office	13–9	0.07	40%	12 Mar →
office	13–6	-0.02	25%	12 Mar →
office	1–3	0.18	13%	12 Mar →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	28%	7 Mar →
mirage	13–5	-0.04	19%	6 Mar →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	7%	4 Mar →
dust2	8–13	0.06	17%	4 Mar →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	18%	4 Mar →
office	13–7	-0.06	13%	3 Mar →
office	13–5	0.06	19%	2 Mar →
mirage	7–13	0.03	28%	1 Mar →
office	13–9	-0.01	22%	27 Feb →
alpine	13–7	0.03	14%	27 Feb →