Ampifox — CS2 Stats

76561198123485918[U:1:163220190]

993Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,684Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7923 of 41511 tracked
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAmpifoxPREMIER23,684 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning50
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY63325Last 10063%Win rateWLLWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.0
Aggression5.8
Utility7.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.0
Utility7.5
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time595ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — overpass 13–11
132Biggest win — inferno
8Longest win streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 28anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2821775%0.02
dust2A1810856%0.01
cacheA1710759%-0.02
infernoS128467%-0.00
ancientA85363%-0.00
nukeC73443%-0.00
anubisD62433%0.02
overpass220100%0.09
train220100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

333Matches
58%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
84.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7465%1.2817.3
Inferno4144%1.2016.2
Ancient3557%1.0416.6
Dust22846%1.1017.0
Vertigo2352%1.0514.3
Anubis1844%1.0916.6
Nuke1464%1.2017.4
Overpass5100%1.1116.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.6%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
81.8%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
594msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
51.1%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
13.87HE damage / grenade
19.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.98% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.0320%14 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0215%14 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0114%14 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0435%31 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0118%24 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0128%24 Jul
dust213–30.0736%24 Jul
cache10–130.0041%24 Jul
cache13–90.0236%17 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0421%17 Jul
mirage13–100.0715%17 Jul
inferno10–130.0121%15 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0421%14 Jul
dust23–1-0.110%14 Jul
dust28–130.0535%14 Jul
nuke0–13-0.0125%14 Jul
dust28–130.0022%14 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0725%14 Jul
dust216–120.0115%14 Jul
mirage13–100.0424%14 Jul
nuke0–2-0.090%13 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0632%13 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0224%12 Jul
anubis13–30.0824%12 Jul
cache13–110.0228%12 Jul
mirage13–30.0316%12 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0525%1 Jul
mirage13–40.0324%1 Jul
dust213–90.0424%1 Jul
dust211–130.0534%1 Jul
nuke13–40.0729%1 Jul
mirage13–50.0414%1 Jul
dust213–100.0030%19 Jun
mirage13–60.0325%19 Jun
inferno9–7-0.0432%2 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0312%19 May
dust214–160.0125%18 May
nuke13–60.1130%18 May
mirage13–10-0.0223%18 May
overpass13–80.0418%18 May
dust213–100.0422%18 May
mirage13–60.1226%18 May
anubis16–140.0631%17 May
inferno13–100.0723%17 May
dust213–30.0422%17 May
dust211–130.0217%15 May
mirage13–60.0121%15 May
inferno13–40.0320%15 May
mirage2–60.0241%15 May
anubis9–130.0228%15 May
train13–4-0.0628%15 May
cache5–11-0.0419%15 May
cache13–11-0.0316%14 May
train13–110.0227%14 May
cache13–7-0.0115%14 May
mirage13–8-0.0335%13 May
dust213–8-0.0618%13 May
ancient13–70.0120%13 May
anubis12–120.0612%13 May
mirage13–90.0332%12 May
ancient13–70.0119%12 May
cache3–13-0.0729%12 May
dust213–80.0416%12 May
cache13–10-0.0134%12 May
cache13–6-0.0141%11 May
dust212–120.0823%11 May
mirage12–120.0018%11 May
inferno12–12-0.0117%10 May
mirage13–60.0316%10 May
cache4–13-0.1111%10 May
cache13–80.0441%9 May
cache13–6-0.0034%8 May
mirage13–80.0619%8 May
cache8–13-0.0313%8 May
cache12–12-0.0229%7 May
cache10–13-0.0423%7 May
cache13–30.0125%1 May
cache13–8-0.0215%29 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0526%22 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0714%10 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0215%10 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0115%9 Apr
dust216–140.0424%9 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0616%27 Mar
ancient13–60.0028%27 Mar
mirage6–130.0718%15 Mar
ancient16–130.0720%15 Mar
ancient13–80.0321%15 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0126%9 Mar
mirage13–70.1218%26 Feb
inferno13–20.0214%26 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0615%26 Feb
dust23–13-0.0750%24 Feb
dust29–13-0.0114%23 Feb
mirage13–100.0415%22 Feb
inferno13–100.0317%20 Feb
mirage13–40.0114%20 Feb
mirage13–160.0724%20 Feb
overpass13–110.1518%18 Feb
mirage13–40.0722%18 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →