Craig

Craig — CS2 Stats

76561198123342688[U:1:163076960]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

401Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
918Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating16,455Purple band · top ~22.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7725 of 12723 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate33.2%48.1%14.9% short
Shot accuracy12.0%12.9%0.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.021.080.06 short
Match win rate39.5%46.5%7.0% short

This profile sits below the typical Pink band player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCraigPREMIER16,455 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning41
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42517Last 10042%Win rateTLTLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.5
Aggression5.8
Utility3.9
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 662ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning4.1
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time659ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 659ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–2
132Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 6ancientWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B31141745%-0.01
mirageC1871139%-0.00
cacheC145936%0.03
infernoB115645%0.02
nukeB105550%0.02
ancientD92722%-0.03
anubisS64267%-0.00
overpass1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

27,985Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
1,644Matches
39.5%Match win rate
33.2%Headshot %
12.0%Shot accuracy
2,658MVPs
542Hours (in match)
673Bombs planted
316Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,941dust2
1,404inferno
1,169nuke
124vertigo
107train
32cbble
30lake
24safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
73.1%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
662msReaction time
26.4%T opening success
44.4%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
2.3%Flash assists
13.48HE damage / grenade
7.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.4449% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage12–120.0218%23 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0611%21 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0314%10 Aug
overpass3–130.0523%10 Aug
inferno9–50.1210%10 Aug
dust211–130.0222%9 Aug
anubis3–13-0.056%9 Aug
dust213–10-0.0119%8 Aug
anubis13–80.0121%8 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0223%8 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0217%8 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0814%6 Aug
nuke13–100.0214%6 Aug
cache13–90.0617%2 Aug
dust28–130.0723%2 Aug
cache9–13-0.028%1 Aug
dust213–70.0526%1 Aug
dust213–60.0522%1 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0018%30 Jul
anubis13–60.0020%28 Jul
mirage13–50.009%28 Jul
nuke13–100.0713%26 Jul
mirage11–6-0.0313%26 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0114%25 Jul
mirage9–13-0.038%25 Jul
dust213–9-0.0526%23 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0519%23 Jul
cache13–30.0215%20 Jul
dust210–13-0.0510%19 Jul
mirage13–30.0516%17 Jul
inferno9–130.0213%16 Jul
cache8–130.0215%15 Jul
dust28–13-0.054%15 Jul
mirage9–130.028%14 Jul
ancient13–8-0.016%14 Jul
dust213–60.0114%13 Jul
cache6–130.0126%12 Jul
dust213–11-0.027%12 Jul
nuke8–130.0511%12 Jul
cache13–70.0620%12 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0217%12 Jul
cache7–130.0511%10 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0112%10 Jul
ancient5–130.058%9 Jul
dust210–130.0127%9 Jul
anubis13–40.0810%9 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0113%9 Jul
cache13–50.0221%7 Jul
inferno12–120.0213%7 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0323%5 Jul
dust213–9-0.0020%5 Jul
inferno13–70.0115%5 Jul
dust26–130.018%4 Jul
dust28–130.0312%4 Jul
inferno6–130.0529%1 Jul
inferno13–100.0111%29 Jun
mirage13–90.0621%29 Jun
dust213–8-0.0419%27 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0530%25 Jun
mirage13–90.036%25 Jun
dust213–110.0022%25 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0317%23 Jun
mirage3–13-0.008%21 Jun
anubis15–15-0.0111%20 Jun
ancient5–11-0.100%20 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0126%20 Jun
dust213–80.0412%16 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0618%16 Jun
dust211–130.0018%13 Jun
dust211–13-0.0616%13 Jun
mirage13–70.0432%2 Jun
cache7–130.0826%31 May
cache9–130.0517%31 May
inferno12–120.0017%31 May
dust210–130.0011%31 May
dust29–130.0117%30 May
ancient13–50.0120%26 May
cache13–10-0.0115%25 May
dust28–13-0.0525%25 May
dust216–14-0.0016%24 May
dust213–9-0.0615%24 May
dust213–6-0.018%24 May
nuke16–14-0.0213%19 May
dust29–13-0.0325%19 May
dust28–130.029%18 May
anubis13–4-0.0410%18 May
nuke16–120.0911%18 May
mirage13–11-0.0014%17 May
dust26–13-0.0817%10 May
ancient15–15-0.0318%8 May
dust25–13-0.0527%8 May
inferno13–20.1237%7 May
dust211–130.0628%7 May
cache0–60.0525%6 May
ancient2–13-0.0816%2 May
nuke13–80.1225%2 May
cache12–120.0420%2 May
inferno6–13-0.0624%1 May
dust213–6-0.0312%1 May
cache9–130.0116%1 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →